Skip to main content

Why India's response to Covid was in striking contrast to the reaction against TB

By Nihir Gulati*
On January 16, 2021, the first-ever dose of the Covid vaccine was administered in India. With the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare claiming to have administered both doses to a mere 10% of India's 94.5 crore adult population, I reached out to Bobby Ramakant, director, for policy and communications at Citizen News Service (CNS), to gain a deeper insight into the snail-like pace of covid vaccine administration in the country.
According to a Delhi  and West Bengal study, more than 75% in each State were willing to get vaccinated. Hence, that is not an issue that is causing the population not to get vaccinated.

Health infrastructure

To get a glimpse of the healthcare system in India, we deep dive into a discussion about tuberculosis. This disease has been plaguing India since the time that Bobby was at college. Contrary to popular belief that TB is a disease of the poor, Booby believes that it is not limited to the lower class of society. However, he does agree that TB is prevalent among the poor because one of its major causes is malnutrition.
India's motto against tuberculosis is: "Pakki jaanch, pakka ilaaj," meaning that if we can detect TB with surety, we can treat it definitely. Sadly, this is not the case, and India has the most number of deaths due to tuberculosis than any other country.
One of the main reasons for this dubious distinction is India's lack of public healthcare infrastructure and awareness. Here is how - 13 different drugs can be used to treat tuberculosis. However, a combination of four out of these 13 drugs is chosen for each person based on their genetic makeup.
This test of genetic makeup is done by a piece of medical equipment known as gene expert. This test helps determine the combination of four drugs that would be the most potent against TB for that person. Successful treatment requires regular medication for a certain period of time. Failing to take those medications on time causes drug resistance, i.e., the bacteria causing tuberculosis become immune to the drug.
Once the drug resistance develops, a new combination of four out of 13 drugs has to be created for that person, and the treatment has to start all over again. The main reason that this happens is poverty and lack of awareness in India.
Although the drugs are free of cost in the government centers in India, the transportation is not, and many people from the poor and remote villages in India failed to reach the government centers for their regular dosage against tuberculosis.
This problem was handled well by the State of Kerala, where they ensured a zero default rate, ensuring that no one missed their medication once the treatment began. This was done by conducting regular surveys and outreach by the government center. If the people cannot reach the government centres, they deliver the drugs to the remote villages to reduce the default rate.
Although this was an excellent reactive strategy, India, with the highest number of TB deaths globally, needed a more proactive approach to counter tuberculosis. Eradication, rather than treatment, should be the goal here.

Contrast with Covid

The response to Covid was in striking contrast to the reaction against TB. Until as late as 2010s, TB in children was treated by giving them partial doses made for adults by breaking the capsules according to the child's weight – a grossly unprofessional method.
On the other hand, the manufacturing of Covid vaccines had already been done before the clinical trials, with the plan that shipping would start as soon as the clinical trials were completed.
However, such urgency and importance were not given to other scientific breakthroughs in the healthcare domain like TB medicines, female condoms, etc. Although the initial enthusiasm was overwhelming, Covid did uncover some gaping holes in the public healthcare system in India.
During Covid's peak, India had one of the lowest number of beds per unit population in the country, and there was an acute shortage in both the private and the public sectors.
To provide health as a human right, we need safer roads, a cleaner environment, better public health systems, more robust public transport
A robust public healthcare system became a need. We need to introduce sustainability in public health by reducing the privatization of and profiteering from healthcare. There is a need to reduce the catastrophic healthcare costs and make sure that emergency healthcare doesn't push people into poverty.
An example of healthcare exploitation is the per-dose cost of Covid medicines which went up from Rs 250 to Rs 780 for Covishield and to Rs 1,450 for Covaxin within 1.5 months (May 1, 2021 to June 21, 2021). These costs made the coronavirus vaccine out of reach for the general public.

Holistic development

Bobby, taking inspiration from Professor Sandeep Pandey (current IIMA professor, previously IITK professor), emphasized the need for developmental justice - a holistic improvement in human development in the country.
He talked about the subtle difference between Universal Health Care and Universal Health Coverage – the former being a proactive approach projecting health as a human right and the latter being a reactive approach concerned with the provision of insurance for the affected. A country should always aim for Universal Health Care rather than coverage because it is a sustainable and stable approach.
To provide health as a human right, we need safer roads, a cleaner environment, better public health systems, more robust public transport, less malnutrition, etc. We would have to progress on all fronts simultaneously to achieve health as a human right.
Bobby proposes that the litmus test for any intervention should be that if it benefits the poorest of the poor in the country, it should be accepted. He firmly believes that the opposite of poverty is equality, not opulence.
An activity that changed Bobby's perspective about development was shunning motorized vehicles and taking up cycling. He realized that the system of highways and wide, fast roads were designed in favor of car-owners, who are less than 5% of the total Indian population.
Road safety, he surmised, was not just about helmets and airbags; it is also about caring for the non-motorized vehicle owners – the pedestrian, cycle rickshaws, etc.
As a cyclist, he felt the safest in the crowded lanes of Lucknow's old city and not on the so-called developed highways. Authentic development, he says, would occur when the collective feeling of safety goes up, not just the safety of the car owners.

Political motives

Taking the example of Thailand in the 70s, where, at the time of recession, the healthcare infrastructure budget for the large cities was instead used to develop the small basic healthcare facilities in the small villages. They have the 30 Bhat scheme, where the state covers all the healthcare costs for 30 Bhats annually (equivalent to Rs 60).
Even in India, we saw the response of the State of Kerala towards TB was superior to that of the other states. They aimed for healthcare rather than economic benefit, which should be the target of all public policy.
After this discussion with Bobby, one thing is clear to me: the only way to change is when we, the citizens and our elected representatives, unlearn our definition of development and healthcare. We need to pressure policymakers to introduce interventions that are socially just and ecologically sustainable.
Rather than treating gender upliftment, environment protection, and universal health care as three separate silos, we need to understand the complex interlinkage between them and simultaneously better the country in all the fundamental human development areas – because only then it will be real development.
---
*PGP 2020-2022, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad 

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.