SC pulls up state govts for 'choking' peoples' right to know: Info Commission vacancies

By Anjali Bhardwaj, Commodore Lokesh Batra (Retd), Amrita Johri*
On August 18, 2021, a petition regarding delay in appointment of information commissioners under the RTI Act was heard by the Supreme Court. The bench of Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari heard the matter. During the hearing, it was pointed out that despite the judgment of the SC, the Union of India and several states had failed to fill the vacancies in the information commission leading to a large number of pending cases and long delays in the disposal of appeals/complaints.
The SC expressed displeasure at the failure of the states to fill vacancies and warned of strict action against non-compliance with its directions (the issues with respect to vacancies in the Central Information Commission were not taken up today due to the unavailability of the counsel).

Maharashtra

It was pointed out that in its February 2019 judgment the SC had directed state of Maharashtra to ensure that the information commission functions at full strength (1 Chief and 10 information commissioners) given the large backlog of appeals and complaints. However, as on date the commission is functioning with only 4 commissioners even though the pendency as of May 31, 2021 stood at more than 75,000 appeals/complaints. The bench pulled up the State of Maharahstra for not filling the vacancies of State Information Commission and warned that the Chief Secretary will be summoned if the state fails to fill the vacancies within 3 weeks.

Karnataka

In its 2019 judgment, given the large pendency, the SC had directed that the State Information Commission (SIC) should function at full strength for which the government must sanction all posts. Whereas the state sanctioned all posts, however, in the hearing it was pointed out that currently 3 posts are vacant even though there is backlog of more than 30,000 appeals/complaints in the commission. The SC directed the state to fill vacancies and file a status report.

Odisha

In the 2019 judgment, the SC had directed the state of Odisha to sanction 3 additional posts so the commission can function with 1 Chief and 6 commissioners given the backlog of cases. In the hearing it emerged that the state had sanctioned only 2 additional posts and currently the commission was functioning with only 4 commissioners. One post had fallen vacant in November 2020 and was yet to be filled up while the Chief had retired on 15.8.2021. The SC directed the government to file a status report.

Telangana

In the hearing it was pointed out that the SIC of Telangana has been functioning without a Chief for one year, despite the fact that the RTI Act envisages a crucial role for the Chief as the general superintendence, direction and management of the affairs of the SIC vests in the Chief. The SC expressed disappointment at the state of affairs and directed that the appointment should be made by the next date of hearing.

Nagaland

It was highlighted that in the case of the SIC of Nagaland the previous Chief retired in January 2020 and since then no new Chief has been appointed. As a result, for 19 months, the commission has been headless. The state was directed to fill the vacancy and file a status report.

West Bengal

In its February 2019 judgment, the SC directed government of West Bengal to create three posts of commissioners in addition to the sanctioned strength of 3 (Chief and 2 information commissioners). During the hearing it was pointed out that currently the commission is functioning with only 2 commissioners (1 Chief and 1 commissioner) though nearly 10,000 appeals/complaints are pending before it. The SC pulled up the state government for failing to file an affidavit before the hearing and for not filling the vacancies.

Jharkhand

Whereas government of Jharkhand was not a respondent in the case, however it was pointed out that the condition viz the information commission is alarming as it has been effectively rendered defunct since May 2020, when the lone information commissioner retired. Since then no information commissioner or Chief has been appointed and the commission has been non functional with people seeking information from public authorities under the jurisdiction of the Jharkhand SIC having no recourse to the independent appellate mechanism prescribed under the RTI Act. The SC expressed anguish at the current state of affairs and directed the state to fill vacancies and also file a report.
The matter with regard to the CIC will now be heard next week while state governments have been given 3 weeks to file status reports indicating the vacancies in the respective SIC and the number of appeals/complaints pending.
The petitioners were represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan and Rahul Gupta.
The affidavit filed by the petitioners in August 2021 can be accessed here
---
*Petitioners

Comments

'Enough evidence' in Indian tradition to support legal basis for same-sex marriage

By Iyce Malhotra, Joseph Mathai, Sandeep Chachra* The ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage provides space for much-needed conversations on issues that have hitherto remained “invisible” or engaged with patriarchal locker room humour. We must recognize that people with diverse sexualities and complex gender identities have faced discrimination, stigma and decades of oppression. Their issues have mainly remained buried in dominant social discourse, and many view them with deep insecurities.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Victim of communal violence, Christians in Manipur want Church leadership to speak up

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* The first eleven days of May 2023 have, in many ways, been a defining period of Indian history! Plenty has happened in a rapid-fire stream of events. Ironically, each one of them are indicators of how crimes and the criminalisation of society has become the ‘new norm’; these include, the May Day rallies with a focus on the four labour codes which are patently against the rights of workers; the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report on 1 May stating that conditions for religious freedom in India “continued to worsen in 2022”; the continued protest by the Indian women wrestlers at Jantar Mantar for the expulsion of the chief of the Indian Wrestlers Federation on very serious allegations; the Elections in Karnataka on 10 May (with communalism and corruption as the mainstay); the release of the fake, derogative and insensitive film ‘The Kerala Story’; the release of World Free Press Index on 3 May which places India

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Polygamy in India "down" in 45 yrs: Muslims' from 5.7 to 2.55%, Hindus' 5.8 to 1.77%, "common" in SCs, STs

By Rajiv Shah Amidst All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) justifying polygamy, saying it “meets social and moral needs and the provision for it stems from concern and sympathy for women”, facts suggest the the practice is down from 5.7 per cent of Muslim families in 1961 to 2.55 per cent in 2006.

Modi govt 'wholly untrustworthy' on Covid data, censored criticism on pandemic: Lancet

By Rajiv Shah* One of the world’s most prestigious health journals, brought out from England, has sharply criticised the Narendra Modi government for being “wholly untrustworthy on Covid-19 health data”, stating, the “official government figures place deaths at more than 530 000, while WHO excess death estimates for 2020 and 2021 are near 4·7 million.”

Undermining law, breastfeeding? Businesses 'using' celebrities to promote baby food

By Rajiv Shah* A report prepared by the top child welfare NGO, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI), has identified as many as 15 offenders allegedly violating the Indian baby food law, the Infant Milk Substitutes Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act 1992, and Amendment Act 2003 (IMS Act), stating, compliance with the law “seems to be dwindling by the day.”

Delhi demolitions for G-20 summit: Whither sabka saath, sabka vikas?, asks NAPM

By Our Representative Well-known civil rights network, National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), even as expressing solidarity with “thousands of traumatized residents of Tughlakabad and some other bastis in New Delhi whose homes have been demolished and whose lives have been ravaged both prior to as well as in the lead-up to the G-20 Summit”, has said this is in utter disregard to “their minimum well-being and gross violation of their rights.”

'Misleading' Lancet estimates on zero food intake in infants, young children of India

By Srinivas Goli, Shalem Balla, Harchand Ram* India is one of the world's hotspots for undernourished children, both in terms of prevalence and absolute numbers. Successive rounds of National Family Health Surveys ( NFHS ) have revealed that the progress observed since the early 1990s is far from what is expected when compared to the country's economic growth.

India joining US sponsored trade pillar to hurt Indian farmers, 'promote' GM seeds, food

Counterview Desk As many as 32 civil society organisations (CSOs), in a letter to Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and India joining the trade pillar, have said that its provisions will allow the US to ensure a more favourable regulatory regime “for enhancing its exports of genetically modified (GM) seeds and GM food”, underlining, it will “significantly hurt the livelihoods of Indian farmers.”

Search This Blog