Skip to main content

What will India gain if it also follows the path of Gen Zia? Of partition horrors day

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 

India is much older than 75 years. Hence our leaders need to speak the language of maturity and reasoning. Unfortunately, the Prime Minister and his government are least bothered about governance and more about elections. To declare August 14 as the 'partition horrors day’ is nothing but a deliberate effort to create an atmosphere of mistrust and disharmony. We all know the horrors of partition and there are issues which can be discussed.
History is becoming a tool to settle scores today, and it seems Narendra Modi and his team are still not satisfied with the huge mandate they got. Both Muslims and Christians history in India is over 700 years old, and we have fought and we lived together. If there are examples of hatred, killings and communal disturbances, there are also examples of mutual love, affection and care.
It is up to you which example you would like to pick up and narrate. Of course, people learn from the wrongs of the past, but to harass and humiliate others for historical wrongs, about which everyone has a different narrative, would only divide the society further.
Whether one likes it or not, Pakistan is a neighbour, and it cannot really be 'deleted', even if one wishes to. One shouldn’t forget, Afghanistan is in a bigger crisis and will bring more headache for India than Pakistan. With Taliban growing its head, India must prepare for a long-term strategy, but the hate-Muslim politics of the Sangh Parivar will only defeat India's foreign policy.
In 75 years we have debated a lot as to who opposed partition and who did not. We have identified heroes and villains. We all have our own narratives. In the process, history has become the biggest casualty. If our Prime Minister wants us to remember the 'horrors of partition', the only way one can learn from it is to honour the rule of law, build an inclusive society and eliminate inequality and prejudices.
Yes, partition brought horrors. Yes, we need to learn our lessons. But is it not a fact that India decided to move ahead forgetting about it? Our constitutional forefathers were aware of it and they never 'accepted' it. India did not decide to become a Hindu Rashtra despite Pakistan openly becoming an Islamic state. The best lessons from both the states are clear.
Pakistan degenerated because the Muslim fanatics there ignored the wise words of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, who wanted an inclusive Pakistan. India was fortunate enough because of the visionary leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru, who ensured India remained a democracy despite all its flaws and faults. In this age, when Nehru is being decried for everything, it is important to give credit to him for this. If India is a democracy today in whatever shape, you must give credit to Nehru.
Indeed, it would have been quite different in case Nehru, as the first Prime Minister of independent India, had said something like 'remembering the horrors of partition'. He had all the strength to condemn and reject extremism of any variety – Hindus or Muslim. He was the person who could stand in front of his car during the riots in Delhi and tell people to shoot at him first before touching the minorities.
A call in this regard from Nehru would mean, we should not allow history to judge people. We should not allow historical incidents to humiliate people. After all, the Sangh Parivar and its elements had not played any glorious role to bring us freedom.
But when Narendra Modi wants us to remember these horrors of partition, what does it mean? What is the meaning of it? We all know that the only research the Sangh Parivar and its 'experts' are doing these days to bring the 'Hindu-Muslim' binary for the upcoming elections. That suits them well. So, you discuss the horrors and tell the world that Muslims created Pakistan. While this theory itself is questionable, the point is, whom are you by aiming at by humiliating our own citizens?
The problem is the Prime Minister does not speak when required. His party does not utter a single word when an Indian citizen is wounded by hatred. Akhlaq, Pehlu Khan, Danish and so many have been murdered; humiliation is happening in the name of cow slaughtering and beef eating, yet we have not heard a single statement of condemnation.
India was fortunate because of visionary leadership of Nehru, who ensured that we remained a democracy despite all our flaws and faults
Even if one says that they were anonymous killers, it is the duty of state leaders to speak up against such incidents. What you are creating is partition in the minds of people everyday, which is much more dangerous than what would have happened in 1947.
The story of partition only tells us that you cannot divide a civilisation on the basis of religion. Hindus, Muslims, Christians and Sikhs have their motherland here. They have lived here for centuries. They contributed to our growth. Their identity is indivisible from the idea of India.
Pakistan became a nation on religious basis but could not sustain because East Pakistan decided to get away from it and we saw the rise of Bangladesh in 1971. The religious rights have made the life of common Pakistanis hell. The Islamic laws unleashed by General Zia ul-Haq only hurt Muslims and gave him an authority to rule the country.
Before Zia, Pakistan was economically better off than India, but thereafter the Islamic zealots destroyed Pakistan. Its economy is in a shambles. Its elite class has returned to Pakistan from the US and the UK to just fight elections and rule the country. Pakistan is the best example for all of us to see as to how a theocratic society destroys itself.
India grew up because it did not become a Hindu Pakistan. It grew up because its leadership opted for a secular socialist republican Constitution which is inclusive and gave opportunity to all. It grew up because it did not impose one nation, one language and one culture on all. It grew up because it was relatively governed through the rule of law.
But where are we heading to? When people come closer to each other and forget those painful tales, you decide to create more divisions? When polarisation and division become 'governance', then what happens? What will India gain if we too follow the path of General Zia-ul Haq? Pakistan failed because its leaders were obsessed with India. They wanted to prove that the two nation theory was right, but they could not do so, because a large number of Pakistani liberals actually appreciated Jawaharlal Nehru.
Today, we have become obsessed with Pakistan. Division, polarisation and rabble rousing only help those who shout in the same language as they do in Pakistan against Hindus. A theocratic society will only kill itself; it oppresses women and the marginalised, as feudal caste supremacists run the day. It creates multiple layers of powerful people, whose only work is to keep the pot boiling so as to enjoy power. In the end, it hurts the interest of the nation.
If a nation is not at peace with itself, how will it progress? Mere rhetoric will not take us further. India will only progress and become stronger if it is inclusive and if the Constitution of India is implemented in letter and spirit, and our political executive behaves more maturely and respects the rule of law.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Iswarchandra Vidyasagar was a 'frustrated' reformer who turned into a conservative

By Bhaskar Sur "If someone says the Manusamhita was written by all wise Manu and the principal scripture of the land and if he asks me to throw it away, I'll say it is nothing short of atrocious audacity." -- Iswarchandra Vidyasagar

Why do I lend my support to voices protesting world class renovation of Gandhi Ashram?

By Martin Macwan* One would not expect an activist working on Dalit rights to join such a protest. Dalits carry unhealed trauma that Gandhi caused to Dr BR Ambedkar and the Dalit cause of effective political representation by using violent means of his own definition in the event of the Poona Pact. This apart, Gandhi’s ideas in general, which changed often, on caste were orthodox. I have nothing to add to the subject after the sharpest critique offered by Dr Ambedkar.

2002 riots: Gujarat assembly 'misinformed' about dereliction of duty, says ex-DGP

By Rajiv Shah  Former Gujarat topcop RB Sreekumar, an IPS officer of the 1971 batch, has alleged that the Gujarat government gave “totally false information” on the floor of the State Assembly regarding the appeal he made to the Gujarat governor for the “initiation of departmental action against those responsible for culpable negligence in maintenance of public order and investigation of genocidal crimes” during the 2002 riots.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Odisha bauxite mining project to 'devastate' life of 2,500 Adivasi, Dalit farmers: NAPM

Counterview Desk  While the public hearing on mining in Mali hills has been cancelled due to protests by Adivasi and Dalit farmers of the Mali Parbat Surakhya Samiti, Odisha, who have been protesting against the proposed bauxite mining project, India’s top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has said it is “deeply concerned” at the decision of the Government of Odisha to push the project in a Schedule-V Adivasi-belt Koraput district against the interests of the people and environment.

'Devastating impact': Rural workers suffer as Govt of India NREGA budget down by 34%

Counterview Desk  A civil rights group, the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha has sent a letter to the Prime Minister and the Minister of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj stating that 34 per cent decrease in the fiscal budget of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) for year 2021-22 has added to woes on India’s rural population, already suffering from “devastating impact” of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Economy in tatters, labour codes 'take away' workers' safety, benefits, right to form TU

By Our Representative  The four new labour codes promulgated by the Government of India came in for sharp criticism from several labour unions and civil rights groups at one-day discussion meeting organised in Ranchi (Jharkhand) on the issue of ‘changes in labour laws. Participants in the meeting asserted that under these new codes, many of the benefits and safeties accorded to labourers have been "taken away", while the right of labourers to create trade unions has been attacked.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Celebrating birthday amidst image of 'coerced, submissive' India ruled by a strong leader

Pushkar Raj*  As the weeks long birthday festivity of the leadership was being rejoiced India wide, the Covid was still raging in several parts of India. The carnival was in line with the post-Covid decisions and actions of the leadership demonstrating a pursuit of personal power and glory instead of national interest in times of disease and death.

Politically-motivated: Global NGO network on ED 'harassment' of Harsh Mander

Counterview Desk  CIVICUS , a top global alliance of civil society organisations seeking to strengthen citizen action and civil society around the world with a claimed membership of more than 10,000, objecting to the alleged harassment of IAS bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander by the Government in India, has said that the the the Enforcement Directorate (ED) raid on his house and office highlights “an ongoing pattern of baseless and politically-motivated criminal charges brought by the authorities against activists across India”.