Skip to main content

Tribal areas: States' bureaucratic structures 'refuse to relinquish' power despite PESA

By RR Prasad* 

The introduction of the Panchayat Raj system through the 73rd Constitutional Amendment is one of the most definitive steps towards institutionalizing a system of decentralized governance in independent India. The 73rd Constitutional Amendment provides substantial space for responsive and participatory governance.
To extend the provisions of the constitution relating to the Panchayats to the Scheduled Areas, a special legislation called Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), 1996 was enacted by the Parliament. Scheduled Areas are those, which are under the 5th Schedule of the Constitution of India where the tribal populations are predominant.
The Act came into force on December 24, 1996 and it is now applicable in the tribal areas of ten States namely, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana that have 5th Schedule Areas. In its 25th year, It would be desirable to look back and assess how far we have moved ahead in the direction of effective implementation of the PESA.

Gandhian concept of Gram Swaraj

The fundamental spirit of the Panchayat Extension Act for tribal areas under 5th Schedule is that it devolves power and authority to Gram Sabha rather than delegation; hence it paves way for participatory democracy.
The provision under Constitution and composition under this act calls for every legislation on the Panchayat in 5th Schedule area to be in conformity with the customary law, social and religious practices and traditional management practices of the community resources.
It also directs the state governments to endow powers and authority to make Gram Sabha function as Institutions of Local Self Governance, specifically on matters of enforcing prohibition of sale and consumption of intoxicant; ownership of minor forest produce; power to prevent alienation of land and restoration of unlawfully alienated land, management of village markets, control over money lending, etc.
PESA also empowered Gram Sabha of the Scheduled Areas to approve plans, programmes for social and economic development, identify beneficiaries under poverty alleviation programmes, certify utilization of funds by gram Panchayats, protect natural resources, including minor forest produce and be consulted prior to land acquisition.
PESA envisaged that each tier of the Local Governance is independent and Panchayats at higher level should not assume the powers and authority of any Panchayat at the lower level or of the Gram Sabha. Further, it also calls for creating the appropriate levels of Panchayats similar to 6th Schedule Area, where the Administrative boundaries are Autonomous enough for self-rule.
PESA is constructed around the Gandhian concept of Gram Swaraj, the governance frame for the village republics. Gandhi’s dream was included in the Constitution as Article 40, which came alive only when PESA was adopted.
While the 73rd Amendment, which inserted Article 243, made the terms gram (village) and Gram Sabha (village assembly) a part of the Constitution for the first time, PESA gave shape to the concept of self governance through empowerment following constitutional recognition of the competence of the Gram Sabha.

Cardinal principle of governance

PESA is based on the cardinal principle of governance that human communities are the best agency to handle most of their survival challenges, manage their affairs and progress towards growing emancipation through the instrumentality of participatory deliberative democracy.
Hence the first substantive section of PESA begins with the legal presumption that the ‘Gram Sabha’ is ‘competent’ and calls upon the state governments to ensure legal, procedural and administrative empowerment as a means of deepening democracy.
The cardinal principal that underlies PESA has two corollaries in relation to development namely a) any community can best decipher advancement and modernity when it is grounded in the strength of its own culture and way of life and b) can negotiate both advancement and modernity only when it is founded on the bedrock of its own culture and way of life. PESA therefore seeks to restore to tribal communities the right of self governance (swaraj).

Uncertain future

Unfortunately, like Gram Swaraj, the vision of the Father of the Nation, PESA remained a prophetic dream. Since its passage PESA has almost been forgotten and has not become part of mainstream political or policy discourse.
The law on tribal self rule which recognized for the first time the competence of a village assembly or Gram Sabha in safeguarding and preserving traditions and customs of the people and the community resources, has almost been forgotten and has not become part of mainstream political or policy discourse.
The States having Scheduled Areas and PESA have proved that it is too difficult to relinquish power in a bureaucratic power structure. They still want to govern the PESA areas through the centralized administration and laws that actually weaken what PESA provisions offer to the tribal community. Consequently, de facto compliance with PESA remains incomplete and perfunctory.
Pathalgadi movement has become a stage for course-correction of tribal movement for implementation of Schedule 5 of the Constitution
Discontent has been brewing up in the tribal belt of the country and effective implementation of PESA would be a definite legal as well as political solution to redress the discontent. Kochang village in Khunti district in Jharkhand, which has been witness to the Pathalgadi movement since 2016, has become a stage for course-correction of the tribal movement for implementation of Schedule 5 of the Constitution in toto.

Core issues

Many State governments have passed laws not fully in conformity with the central law. The implementation of the law has been severely hampered by the reluctance of most state governments to make laws and rules that conform to the spirit of the law.
Contentious issues like the ownership of minor forest produce, planning and management of minor water bodies and prevention of alienation of tribal lands have remained unsettled though recognized as traditional rights in PESA. Apart from that, transfer of fund and functionaries to the lower level government has not taken place after devolving statutory powers to the Gram Sabha and Panchayats.
Obstacles in the effective implementation of PESA can be attributed mainly to the two factors: (1) Legal and (2) Political issues. Legal issues include definition of village, gaps and inconsistencies between the Central and the State Acts, clash between PESA and pre-existing laws, lack of clarity about customary practices and cultural identity etc. Whereas political issues include (a) lack of political will, ignorance about PESA among different segments, fragmentation of well-knit tribal society because of electoral competition etc.
In the 5th Schedule Areas, villages have not been notified as per the PESA Act. Since PESA villages have not been notified, PESA Gram Sabha has also not been notified as a result PESA Act remains ineffective. Functionaries of the Gram Sabha have not been notified and the Gram Sabha Kosah (Account) has not been opened.
Despite Gram Sabha having the ownership for the Minor Forest Produce (MFP), there is no justification in keeping some important MFP under the nationalized category in many States having the 5th Schedule Areas. Further, the Minimum Support Price (MSP) for the MFP announced by the Central government is applicable only to the non-nationalized MFPs.
This approach totally delinks the PESA Gram Sabha from the management of the MFP. Customary laws in the 5th Schedule Areas have not been documented and codified to enable the Gram Sabha to resolve the local dispute as per the traditions.
The tribal development plan is not being referred to the Gram Sabha for approval and also the Utilization Certificate is being accepted without approval of the PESA Gram Sabha as per the provisions of PESA. 
Ensuring disaggregation of the tribal sub-plan allocation in a state having 5th Schedule Areas to the tribal development plans prepared at the PESA demarcated villages on the basis of the percentages of the tribal population has now become necessary to accelerate the pace of socio-economic development in the 5th Schedule Areas.
Similarly, funds from other institutional sources such as Special Central assistance to the tribal sub-plan (SCA to TSP) and under article 275(1) must also devolve to the Gram Sabh Kosh so that the stakeholder community can decide the need based investment.

Pledges for PESA

It is true that due to lack of political will, tribal rights in 5th Schedule Areas have been disregarded strategically. It is hoped that in its 25th year of implementation, serious efforts would be pledged to identify the pitfalls and promote policies that pave the environment for establishment, prevalence and persistence of a system of tribal self rule in the 5th Schedule Areas.
Nothing less than pledging plausible and time bound actions to implement PESA in letter and spirit would be required in its silver jubilee year.
---
*Professor (Retd), National Institute of Rural Development & Panchayati Raj, Hyderabad

Comments

RR PRASAD said…
One small correction by the author.

The Minimum Support Price (MFP) for the MFP announced by the Central government is applicable only to the nationalized MFPs. It should be read as:

The Minimum Support Price (MFP) for the MFP announced by the Central government is applicable only to the non-nationalized MFPs.
RR PRASAD said…
Thanks a lot.

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Don't agree on domestic subsidies, ensure food security at WTO meet: Farmer leaders

Counterview Desk  The Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements (ICCFM), a top network of farmers’ organizations in India, in a letter to Piyush Goyal, Minister of Commerce and Industry, has asked him to “safeguard food security and sovereignty, even as ensuring peasants' rights" at the 13th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO MC 13), to take place from 26 to 29 February 2024 in Abu Dhabi.

Students, lawyers, professors detained in Delhi for demonstrating in support of farmers

By Our Representative  About 25 protestors, belonging to the civil rights network, Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a coalition of over 40 organisations, were detained at Jantar Mantar for holding a demonstration in support of the farmers' stir on Friday. Those detained included students, lawyers and professors, including Prof Nandita Narain and Prof N Sachin. 

Solar energy funding dips 9% in 2023; 2024 'kicks off' with US$1 billion investment

By Lakshmitha Raj*  Solar energy tech companies have already secured slightly over US$1 billion in funding in 2024 (till Feb 7, 2024) after total funding into Solar Energy companies in India fell 9% to US$1.55B in 2023 from US$1.7B in 2022. A total of 39 $100M+ rounds have been closed till date, with Delhi leading the city-wise funding, followed by Gurugram and Mumbai.

Maize, bajra, jute, banana cultivation banned off West Bengal border: Plea to NHRC

Counterview Desk  West Bengal-based human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Manch, and is national convenor of the Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity, in a representation to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission, second within few days, has bought to light one more case of trespassing and destruction of a fertile banana plantation by BSF personnel along the Indo-Bangladesh border, stating, despite a written complaint to the police has taken "no initiative".

Sharp 61-85% fall in Tech startup funding in India's top 'business-friendly' States

By Rajiv Shah Funding in Tech startups in top business-friendly Indian states has witnessed a major fall, a data intelligence platform for private market research has said in a series of reports it has released this month. Analysing Tech startup data of Telangana, Maharashtra, Delhi NCR, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala, Tracxn Technologies Ltd , the Bengaluru-based research firm, finds that except for Kerala, funding witnessed a fall of anywhere between 61% and 85%.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Will Budget 2024 help empower city govts, make them India's growth engines?

By Soumyadip Chattopadhyay, Arjun Kumar* Cities in India are envisioned as engines of growth. Any meaningful long-term vision for India would be incomplete without planning for the cities and quite rightly, urbanization is considered as one of the country’s top developmental challenges. Realization of full potential of cities depends crucially on their ability to provide ‘enabling’ environment especially in terms of sustained provision of a wide range of urban infrastructure and services.