Skip to main content

Govt of India making 'patently false' claim on appointing information commissioners

By Anjali Bhardwaj, Commodore (retd) Lokesh Batra, Amrita Johri* 

A petition regarding delay in appointment of information commissioners under the Right to Information (RTI) Act was heard by the Supreme Court. The bench of Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari heard the matter. During the hearing, it was pointed out that despite repeated directions by the SC, the Union of India (UOI) has failed to fill the vacancies in the information commission leading to a large number of pending cases and long delays in the disposal of appeals/complaints.
In its last order in the matter on December 16, 2019, the SC had directed that all the vacancies be filled within a period of three months. Prior to the hearing, the UOI in December 2019, had invited applications for 4 posts of information commissioners (ICs). While these posts had been advertised in January, 2019 as well, the vacancies were not filled despite the judgment of the SC. Finally, in March 2020, an existing commissioner was appointed to the post of Chief and only one new IC was appointed resulting in four vacancies persisting.
The Central government filed a status report dated April 24, 2020 claiming that “the process of appointment in response of Information Commissioners in Central Information Commission has been completed within three months as directed by this Hon’ble Court in its Order dated December 6, 2019.” This claim is patently false and misleading as the UOI was to fill all the vacancies which were advertised and not merely appoint one information commissioner and a Chief. The affidavit notes that 250 applications were received pursuant to the advertisement for 4 posts of information commissioners, however, no reason is given as to why only one vacant post was filled, instead of filling all four.
In July 2020, UOI issued fresh advertisement for appointment of up to six information commissioners and for the post of Chief of CIC which was scheduled to fall vacant shortly. By the end of September 2020, six posts including that of the Chief had fallen vacant in the CIC. In light of the large number of vacancies, the petitioners filed an application seeking an early listing of the matter. The application states, “It is further submitted that it appears the UOI is resorting to issuing fresh advertisements instead of filling all the advertised vacant posts in a bid to cause undue delay in the appointments thereby frustrating peoples' right to information.”
In November 2020, the appointment of three new information commissioners and the selection of an existing commissioner as the Chief was notified. Even though the advertisement had invited applications for up to six vacant posts of information commissioners and a total of 355 applications were received, only three information commissioners without assigning any reasons as to why the remaining posts were being left vacant. As a result, three vacancies persisted in the CIC.
During the hearing on July 7, 2021, it was highlighted that with respect to the appointments made in November 2020, the Leader of Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha who is a member of the Selection Committee vide his ‘Dissent Note’ dated October 24, 2020 raised concerns regarding the shortlisting and selection process not being as per the directions of the Supreme Court judgment dated February 15, 2019.
The LoP had highlighted that the Search Committee in violation of the directions of the SC had failed to make public or even share with the Selection Committee the basis and criteria adopting for shortlisting candidates. Further, he objected to the search committee arbitrarily shortlisting a person who had not even applied for the post in response to the advertisement. The LoP also noted that the search committee had failed to comply with the direction of the SC that candidates should be shortlisted from all backgrounds and not merely former bureaucrats. 
The number of pending appeals and complaints has climbed to 36,711 as on July 7, 2021  as compared to 33,701 on December 16, 2019
Extracts from the dissent note:
“1.3… Since the Search Committee has only been constituted to aid and assist the Selection Committee and it is the Selection Committee which is the statutory body to select the candidates as mentioned hereinabove. It is extremely imperative that the Search Committee discharges its functions in a transparent manner. However, by not providing the reasons for shortlisting/ rejection of candidates and by ignoring the dictum of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Search Committee has failed to discharge the functions for which it was constituted. Even as the Search Committee headed by none less than the Cabinet Secretary of India, arbitrarily and blatantly ignored every facet of transparency and laid down process, one is forced to conclude that it did not apply its mind at all. In either case, the whole exercise smacks of apparent bias and favouritism and therefore renders the entire process untenable…
“2.2 Shockingly, another such recommendation by the Search Committee is that of Shri Uday Mahurkar, whose name has been shortlisted for the post of IC, however, Shri Mahurkar’s name does not even find mention in the list of 355 applicants, as provided by the DoPT, who have applied for the position of ICs. The fact that the Search Committee has sky-dropped the name of Shri Mahurkar casts very serious aspersions on the integrity of the Search Committee. While on one hand this renders the entire exercise of inviting applications through advertisement useless, on the other hand even if one were to give the liberty of choice the Search Committee, the basic principle of documentation of a reasoned and justified selection, has been totally overlooked.
“2.3 In this regard, the Cabinet Secretary as Chairman of the Search Committee, must explain, within one week from today, stating the considerations for which the Search Committee chose to name Shri Uday Mahurkar- an open supporter of the ruling political party and its ideology. This issue assumes greater significance in light of the fact that Shri Mahurkar, though a journalist, has a pre-fixed ideology of supporting the ruling party (kindly verify his articles, comments, social media profile etc.) and had not even applied for the job of Information Commissioner. The Cabinet Secretary needs to explain the special reasons and pressure exhorted upon him for picking up the name of Shri Mahurkar on a completely out of turn basis which smacks of apparent bias on the face of it.”
During the hearing it was highlighted that the order of the SC dated December 16, 2019 has not been complied with till date and currently, three vacancies persist in the Central Information Commission. The number of pending appeals and complaints has climbed to 36,711 as on July 7, 2021 (as per information on CIC website) as compared to 33,701 on December 16, 2019. 
Further, it was stated that a perusal of the CIC website shows that currently the commission is hearing and disposing appeals/complaints filed before it in mid-2019 i.e. approximately 24 months after they were filed.
It was also highlighted that several respondent state governments have also failed to comply with the directions given of the SC. For instance, the State Information Commission of Maharashtra is functioning with only 5 commissioners and there is a backlog of nearly 75,000 appeals/complaints as of May 31, 2021. Similarly, vacancies persist in SICs of Karnataka, Odisha and West Bengal despite directions to appoint appropriate number of commissioners commensurate with the pending matters.
The petitioners were represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan and Rahul Gupta.
---
*Petitioners

Comments

Unknown said…
What can be a bigger indictment of the Govt in power?

TRENDING

Muted profit margins, moderate increase in costs and sales: IIM-A survey of 1000 cos

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad’s (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES) has said that the cost perceptions data obtained from India’s business executives suggests that there is “mild increase in cost pressures”.

What's Bill Gates up to? Have 'irregularities' found in funding HPV vaccine trials faded?

By Colin Gonsalves*  After having read the 72nd report of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on alleged irregularities in the conduct of studies using HPV vaccines by PATH in India, it was startling to see Bill Gates bobbing his head up and down and smiling ingratiatingly on prime time television while the Prime Minister lectured him in Hindi on his plans for the country. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Alleged killing of another Bangladesh youth inside Indian territory: NHRC inquiry sought

By Kirity Roy* There was yet another incident of the killing of a Bangladeshi youth by the Border Security Force personnel attached with ‘Barthar’ BOP of ‘G’ Company of 75 BSF Battalion. In last five years several incidents of killings happened under this police station’s jurisdiction and the cases will get the award as “Not Guilty” as usual.

Govt putting India's professionals, skilled, unskilled labour 'at mercy of' big business

By Thomas Franco, Dinesh Abrol*  As it is impossible to refute the report of the International Labour Organisation, Chief Economic Advisor Anantha Nageswaran recently said that the government cannot solve all social, economic problems like unemployment and social security. He blamed the youth for not acquiring enough skills to get employment. Then can’t the people ask, ‘Why do we have a government? Is it not the government’s responsibility to provide adequate employment to its citizens?’

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Modi model, Hindutva icon 'justified' alliance with Muslim League before Independence

By Shamsul Islam*  Our PM describes himself as ‘Hindu’ nationalist and member of RSS. He proudly shares the fact that he was groomed to be a political leader by one of the two fathers of the Hindutva politics, MS Golwalkar (the other being VD Savarkar) and given the task of establishing Hindutva polity in India after eradicating secularism.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Indians witnessing 'regression to Hindutva politics' under Modi ahead of elections

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The forthcoming general election in India, scheduled from April 19, 2024, to June 1, 2024, to elect the 543 members of the 18th Lok Sabha and the new Government of India, carries immense significance for the preservation of India's identity as a liberal, secular, and constitutional democracy.