Skip to main content

Pro-corporate? New GoI circular 'blatant attempt' to control Adivasi lives, livelihoods

By Hemant Das* 

The Indian Community Activists Network (ICAN) condemns the anti-forest dwellers circular jointly issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and the (Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA), Government of India (GoI) on July 6. 
In the name of serving the best interests of the Adivasis and other forest dwellers, the circular makes a bold and blatant attempt to place Forest Department again in control of their lives and livelihood in violation of the letter and spirit of the Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006.
Most conspicuously, this letter, which sets directions on management of community forest resources, has been drafted without any consultation with or informed consent of the forest dwellers’ Gram Sabhas and/or the forest rights groups.
Indeed, the Forest Department must co-operate with the Gram Sabha to help it implement Community Forest Resource Management Rights recognised by FRA, but it has never accepted the new role defined under FRA, which is the hallmark of democratic decentralisation, to work under the supremacy of the Gram Sabha. 
This is evident from the way in which the circular tries to legitimise Joint Forest Management (JFM), a programme created by executive order of the MoEFCC, and every village JFM Committee has the forest fuard as secretary to de facto control the committee.
It is clear from the smug­gling in of JFM into the Circular that MoEFCC’s attitude to undermine FRA remains unchanged. The circular shows how meekly has MoTA, the nodal ministry to oversee FRA implementation, surrendered to MoEFCC, which has in recent years liberalized the laws and regulations related to protection of environment in favour of  'ease of doing business’. 
It has also diluted the role of Gram Sabhas by eliminating the need for public hearings in most projects, so that, big corporate houses can flagrantly exploit the natural wealth of forests at the cost of forest cover and forest people.
The veto power given in FRA to Gram Sabhas against diversion of forest land for any non-forest purpose has been repeatedly ignored. We must not forget that last year the Prime Minister had initiated the auction of 41 coal blocks that would destroy an enormous area of our forests. In this backdrop, ICAN reads the joint circular as culmination of the pro-corporate process set in motion last year.
The Forest Department, in the guise of a guide or mentor or manager, will now on be present in every area of the forest dwellers’ life. Any dispute arising out of the interpretation of FRA by the government agencies would be referred to the two ministries, MoTA and MoEFCC.
The main cause of any dispute arising in the implementation of FRA is the Forest Department’s obstructive role in the rights recognition process. Evidently, MoEFCC and the Indian Forest Service are much stronger than MoTA within the Union Government. It is very evident that in the event of any dispute MoEFCC’s views will prevail, to the detriment of forest-dwellers’ rights.
Forest dwellers have developed NTFP collection skills through generations. FRA grants ownership of non-timber forest products (NTFP) to Gram Sabhas ending the monopoly of Forest Department over NTFP collection, processing and sale. The joint circular empowers the Forest Department to implement skill development programmes for capacity building of individual gatherers and teach them better ways to collect non-timber forest produce.
It will supposedly mentor Gram Sabhas in preparing the conservation plans in their area. While the Forest Department is a single streamlined central agency, Gram Sabhas, already weak and scattered, will not be able to resist the imposition of Forest Department schemes coming from the above.
The joint circular talks of integrating Gram Sabhas’ forest resource management plans with Forest Department micro, working or management plans. According to the provision in FRA of recognition of Community Forest Resource Management rights, Gram Sabhas are empowered to come up with a conservation plan that not only focuses on biodiversity protection or commercial potential of NTFP, but tries to achieve results keeping in mind the social, cultural and economic needs of its members as well as the future of its members.
Joint circular is silent on biggest problem faced by forest-dwellers under FRA --  tardy and obstructive process of rights recognition
The Forest Department vide their working plan brings about plantation and conservation programmes that results in changing the character of the forest, loss of ownership over NTFP, loss of livelihood and eviction. Further, the role of the Forest Department and its agencies in value chain addition of NTFPS collected by forest dwellers, as indicated in the joint letter, will continue and reinforce the Forest Department’s monopoly on NTFPs.
The joint circular is silent on the biggest problem faced by forest-dwellers under FRA -- the tardy and obstructive process of the rights recognition. Hundreds of thousands of forest dwellers are under the threat of eviction from the land where their ancestors spent their entire lives. Regrettably, instead of coming out with its own plan for strict and full implementation of FRA the Tribal Affairs ministry has succumbed to the pressure of MoEFCC, which has chosen to function as an agent of big corporate houses that see lucrative opportunity in destruction of our forests.
Though the joint circular (para 2), while explaining the rationale of FRA recognises “insecurity of tenure and fear of eviction” as ‘historical injustice’, that spirit is missing in it. It, therefore, needs to be comprehensively re-drafted to implement the letter and spirit of FRA ICAN calls on the people in general and activists in particular to reject the joint circular in its present form, unite and save FRA. This joint circular is one more step that threatens ruin of forests and forest dwellers.
ICAN intends to organise, support and join with the protests against this ill conceived letter building up in different corners of the country and seeks cooperation of all people’s organisations in resisting the government attempts to sabotage FRA.
---
*Convener, Forest Rights group, Indian Community Activists Network (ICAN), Daltonganj, Jharkhand

Comments

TRENDING

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...