Skip to main content

Pro-corporate? New GoI circular 'blatant attempt' to control Adivasi lives, livelihoods

By Hemant Das* 

The Indian Community Activists Network (ICAN) condemns the anti-forest dwellers circular jointly issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and the (Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA), Government of India (GoI) on July 6. 
In the name of serving the best interests of the Adivasis and other forest dwellers, the circular makes a bold and blatant attempt to place Forest Department again in control of their lives and livelihood in violation of the letter and spirit of the Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006.
Most conspicuously, this letter, which sets directions on management of community forest resources, has been drafted without any consultation with or informed consent of the forest dwellers’ Gram Sabhas and/or the forest rights groups.
Indeed, the Forest Department must co-operate with the Gram Sabha to help it implement Community Forest Resource Management Rights recognised by FRA, but it has never accepted the new role defined under FRA, which is the hallmark of democratic decentralisation, to work under the supremacy of the Gram Sabha. 
This is evident from the way in which the circular tries to legitimise Joint Forest Management (JFM), a programme created by executive order of the MoEFCC, and every village JFM Committee has the forest fuard as secretary to de facto control the committee.
It is clear from the smug­gling in of JFM into the Circular that MoEFCC’s attitude to undermine FRA remains unchanged. The circular shows how meekly has MoTA, the nodal ministry to oversee FRA implementation, surrendered to MoEFCC, which has in recent years liberalized the laws and regulations related to protection of environment in favour of  'ease of doing business’. 
It has also diluted the role of Gram Sabhas by eliminating the need for public hearings in most projects, so that, big corporate houses can flagrantly exploit the natural wealth of forests at the cost of forest cover and forest people.
The veto power given in FRA to Gram Sabhas against diversion of forest land for any non-forest purpose has been repeatedly ignored. We must not forget that last year the Prime Minister had initiated the auction of 41 coal blocks that would destroy an enormous area of our forests. In this backdrop, ICAN reads the joint circular as culmination of the pro-corporate process set in motion last year.
The Forest Department, in the guise of a guide or mentor or manager, will now on be present in every area of the forest dwellers’ life. Any dispute arising out of the interpretation of FRA by the government agencies would be referred to the two ministries, MoTA and MoEFCC.
The main cause of any dispute arising in the implementation of FRA is the Forest Department’s obstructive role in the rights recognition process. Evidently, MoEFCC and the Indian Forest Service are much stronger than MoTA within the Union Government. It is very evident that in the event of any dispute MoEFCC’s views will prevail, to the detriment of forest-dwellers’ rights.
Forest dwellers have developed NTFP collection skills through generations. FRA grants ownership of non-timber forest products (NTFP) to Gram Sabhas ending the monopoly of Forest Department over NTFP collection, processing and sale. The joint circular empowers the Forest Department to implement skill development programmes for capacity building of individual gatherers and teach them better ways to collect non-timber forest produce.
It will supposedly mentor Gram Sabhas in preparing the conservation plans in their area. While the Forest Department is a single streamlined central agency, Gram Sabhas, already weak and scattered, will not be able to resist the imposition of Forest Department schemes coming from the above.
The joint circular talks of integrating Gram Sabhas’ forest resource management plans with Forest Department micro, working or management plans. According to the provision in FRA of recognition of Community Forest Resource Management rights, Gram Sabhas are empowered to come up with a conservation plan that not only focuses on biodiversity protection or commercial potential of NTFP, but tries to achieve results keeping in mind the social, cultural and economic needs of its members as well as the future of its members.
Joint circular is silent on biggest problem faced by forest-dwellers under FRA --  tardy and obstructive process of rights recognition
The Forest Department vide their working plan brings about plantation and conservation programmes that results in changing the character of the forest, loss of ownership over NTFP, loss of livelihood and eviction. Further, the role of the Forest Department and its agencies in value chain addition of NTFPS collected by forest dwellers, as indicated in the joint letter, will continue and reinforce the Forest Department’s monopoly on NTFPs.
The joint circular is silent on the biggest problem faced by forest-dwellers under FRA -- the tardy and obstructive process of the rights recognition. Hundreds of thousands of forest dwellers are under the threat of eviction from the land where their ancestors spent their entire lives. Regrettably, instead of coming out with its own plan for strict and full implementation of FRA the Tribal Affairs ministry has succumbed to the pressure of MoEFCC, which has chosen to function as an agent of big corporate houses that see lucrative opportunity in destruction of our forests.
Though the joint circular (para 2), while explaining the rationale of FRA recognises “insecurity of tenure and fear of eviction” as ‘historical injustice’, that spirit is missing in it. It, therefore, needs to be comprehensively re-drafted to implement the letter and spirit of FRA ICAN calls on the people in general and activists in particular to reject the joint circular in its present form, unite and save FRA. This joint circular is one more step that threatens ruin of forests and forest dwellers.
ICAN intends to organise, support and join with the protests against this ill conceived letter building up in different corners of the country and seeks cooperation of all people’s organisations in resisting the government attempts to sabotage FRA.
---
*Convener, Forest Rights group, Indian Community Activists Network (ICAN), Daltonganj, Jharkhand

Comments

TRENDING

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

Central pollution watchdog sees red in Union ministry labelling waste to energy green

By Chythenyen Devika Kulasekaran*  “Destructors”, “incinerators” and “waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration” all mean the same thing – indiscriminate burning of garbage! Having a history of about one and a half centuries, WTE incinerators have seen several reboots over the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. 

First-of-its-kind? 'Eco-friendly, low cost' sewage treatment system installed in Gujarat

Counterview Desk Following the installation of the Unconventional Decentralized Multi-Stage Reactor (UDMSR) for sewage treatment, a note on what is claimed to be the  first-of-its-kind technology said, the treated sewage from this system “can be directly utilized for agricultural purposes”, even as proving to be a “saviour in the times of water crisis.”

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Indo-Bangla border: Farmers facing 'illegal obstacles' in harvesting, transporting yields

  Counterview Desk  In a representation to the chairperson, National Human Rights Commission, human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), has said that Border Security Force (BSF) personnel are creating "illegal obstacles" for farmers seeking to harvest their ripened yields and transport them to the market in village Jhaukuthi of Cooch Behar district.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Wasteland, a colonial legacy, being used to 'give away' vast tracts to Ratnagiri refinery

By Fouziya Tehzeeb* William D’Souza, a 55-year old farmer from Kuthethur, Mangalore, was busy mixing cattle feed when we arrived at his doorsteps. Around 25 km from the bustling city of Mangalore, Kuthethur is a lush green village with thick vegetation. On the way to William’s house the idyllic view gets blocked by the flares and smoke arising from the Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL).

CAA disregards India's inclusive plural ethos, 'betrays' ideals of freedom struggle: PUCL

Counterview Desk    "Outraged" at the move of the Central government to implement the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA 2019) weeks before the election, the top rights group, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), has demanded that the law be repealed. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Invincible, Modi 'taller' than BJP, RSS: An opportunity for Congress beyond 2024?

By NS Venkataraman*  With the announcement of poll schedule for the 2024 parliamentary election, there is palpable excitement and expectation amongst the countrymen  about the shape of things to happen in India after the  results of the election would be announced. There is also speculation abroad about the future course of developments in India.