Did President clarify from Finance Ministry why his salary is deducted disproportionately?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
What does one make of a situation when the first citizen of the country 'feels' helpless because of income tax deduction on his salary? President Ram Nath Kovind must be getting Rs 5 lakh per month as salary, but at a public meeting organised at his birth place, he said that over Rs 2.75 lakh per month get deducted from it. He complained that a local teacher is getting more salary than him, and so do government bureaucrats.
I am sure if President Kovind knew that teachers and bureaucrats get tax deduction, though none of them get the luxury which is enjoyed by the President of India. One does not know why the President was feeling so bad, especially when his salary is absolutely tax free. It is time for our 'able' Finance Minister to explain to the nation as why are they deducting more amount from the salary of our poor Rashtrapatiji.
It is a shocking statement to say the least. One, the President's office has luxuries attached to it, apart from perks and facilities. Even after retirement , he would be getting a decent salary, including a luxurious house and one assistant. I have never heard any past President of India speak about his or her salary, which were never a matter of concern.
The President is the custodian of our rights. He should encourage us to pay tax, but it is also important that, if a person, whose salary and perks are income tax free, is part of a campaign, it should be termed hypocritical. When the President speaks to people and complains that he does not get anything special and that a college teacher or a sarkari babu gets more than him, he is generalising things.

He should remember, teachers are not paid for certain government duties for which they are used. Secondly, even in universities, things are not the same everywhere. Thirdly, I am sure, teachers are not getting 'tax free' salary, nor do they enjoy any power and perks.
During the President's visit to his hometown, he went by a 'special' train provided by Indian Railways. Teachers must book their tickets much in advance and have to pay for any travel. I am not sure if the Railways charged money from the Rashtrapati Bhavan. Worse, the security protocol of the President in Kanpur reportedly led to two deaths. One child died and got crushed and another woman, who was suffering from post-Covid complications, could not reach hospital because of traffic diversions and stoppage, as President's motorcade was passing by. VIP culture in India remains powerful and reminds all of us 'hamari aukat kya hai'.
Police officials, of course, apologised to the person whose child got killed, but is this apology enough? Importantly, it is officials who have to pay the price of such happenings. After all, protocols are created by officials under the guidance of the top leadership. Shouldn't the President's office speak out? How many of us have the luxury of moving and stopping traffic at will?
President Kovind should not worry about his salary. He must seek clarification from the Finance Ministry as to why, if at all, his salary was being deducted disproportionately, i.e. more than 50% of his earnings. Income tax rates in India are not so high; and why should the President pay more? There is no need for the President to justify his tax deductions which actually should never happen, nor should he make us feel that he is an ordinary citizen. He is the President of India and the first citizen and should get whatever luxuries, power, prestige, perks he is entitled to.

One only wishes him to be the custodian of our rights and our Constitution drafted by Baba Saheb Ambedkar

One only wishes him to be the custodian of our rights and our Constitution drafted by Baba Saheb Ambedkar. I have not seen the President speak much about Baba Saheb. I just want to remind him how President Giani Zail Singh and President KR Narayanan functioned in their offices. Both these Presidents gave a new meaning to their office.
Giani Zail Singh took on the might of Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi who was not consulting him. Gianiji showed Rajiv the mirror: that the President has enough power to dismiss him. President KR Narayanan protected our Constitution and its secular values. He did not sign on the dotted lines of the government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Narayanan returned the order which wanted to impose President's rule in Uttar Pradesh. He reminded the government time and again about its constitutional duties much to the discomfort of the then ruling party.
Hope President Kovind enjoyed this trip to his native place. Uttar Pradesh is going to polls early next year, and the Rashtrapatiji has a lot to do o protect the Constitutional rights and political freedom in the State.
Hope the President will act whenever there is an attempt to throttle the rights of the people as he has the shining example of President KR Narayanan reminding the government to follow Constitutional path and protect rights of the people.
---
*Human rights defender. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat. Twitter: @freetohumanity

Comments

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan In a groundbreaking study spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

From protest to proof: Why civil society must rethink environmental resistance

By Shankar Sharma* As concerned environmentalists and informed citizens, many of us share deep unease about the way environmental governance in our country is being managed—or mismanaged. Our complaints range across sectors and regions, and most of them are legitimate. Yet a hard question confronts us: are complaints, by themselves, effective? Experience suggests they are not.

Kolkata event marks 100 years since first Communist conference in India

By Harsh Thakor* A public assembly was held in Kolkata on December 24, 2025, to mark the centenary of the First Communist Conference in India , originally convened in Kanpur from December 26 to 28, 1925. The programme was organised by CPI (ML) New Democracy at Subodh Mallik Square on Lenin Sarani. According to the organisers, around 2,000 people attended the assembly.

Dalit woman student’s death sparks allegations of institutional neglect in Himachal college

By A Representative A Dalit rights organisation has alleged severe caste- and gender-based institutional violence leading to the death of a 19-year-old Dalit woman student at Government Degree College, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, and has demanded arrests, resignations, and an independent inquiry into the case.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

The architect of Congolese liberation: The life and legacy of Patrice Lumumba

By Harsh Thakor* Patrice Émery Lumumba remains a central figure in the history of African decolonization, serving as the first Prime Minister of the independent Republic of the Congo. Born on July 2, 1925, Lumumba emerged as a radical anti-colonial leader who sought to unify a nation fractured by decades of Belgian rule. His tenure, however, lasted less than seven months before his dismissal and subsequent assassination on January 17, 1961.

Venezuela and the crisis of global order: Erosion of rules-based international order

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The American attack on Venezuela violates every principle of international law that the collective West claims to uphold. The response from the European Union—“we are monitoring the situation”—exposes the hollowness of these claims. WhatsApp gossipers may celebrate this as an act of “bravery,” but what kind of bravery is it to intimidate a neighbour that is neither large in size nor strong in military power?

Search This Blog