Skip to main content

Modi govt, NIA 'solely responsible' for sharp deterioration in Fr Stan's health: JJM

By A Representative
Even as 84-year old human rights leader Father Stan Swamy’s health has deteriorated and he has been put on a ventilator at the Holy Family hospital in Mumbai, the the civil rights group, Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JJM), has accused the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the Central government for being "solely responsible for the sufferings of this elderly person."
In a statement, JJM said, the NIA court also played its role by denying him a bail on both medical grounds and merit", even as criticising the Maharashtra government for failing to offer "assurances" regarding support for Stan. Since early May, Stan was keeping unwell at Taloja. He had fever, cough, extreme weakness and a running stomach.
JJM said, "Even though he demonstrated severe Covid symptoms, he was not tested at Taloja. After a public outcry, he was administered Covid vaccine. He also tested positive for Covid. Ironically, he was given the vaccine when he was already severely ill at the beginning of the second wave." The High Court allowed his transfer from the Taloja jail to the Holy Family hospital on May 28.
Stan was arrested in the Bhima Koregaon case on October 8, 2020. Adivasis, Gram Sabhas, civil society, several political leaders and parties, and the Jharkhand Chief Minister have condemned Stan’s arrest and expressed support and solidarity with him, said JJM, adding, the Arsenal report, prepared on the basis of electronic evidence collected by the NIA, has "exposed how fake documents were planted into the computers of the accused in the Bhima Koregaon case."
"Without an iota of evidence against him in the case, he languished in jail, and is now battling for his life (still under arrest). Also, denying bail to an elderly and ailing person, with limited mobility and no history of violence against others, is beyond comprehension", JJM asserted.
Criticising the Modi government, JMM regretted, even now as Stan fights for his life, it continues to look away, demanding from the Central and Maharashtra governments that all necessary medical and specialised treatment should be urgently ensured for Stan; the High Court should immediately grant him bail; and he should be released and sent back to Jharkhand at the earliest.

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.
2 comments
»

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...
2 comments
»

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.
Post a Comment
»