Skip to main content

How real is Mamata challenge to Modi? Preparing for 2024 'khela hobey' moment

By Prof Ujjwal K Chowdhury* 

Third time elected West Bengal Chief Minister, Mamata Banerjee is on a whirlwind tour of Delhi, meeting everyone who matters within and beyond the government, the Prime Minister, the President, some Cabinet ministers, Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, several other opposition leaders, et al.
The purpose is very obvious: extract maximum benefits for Bengal, and work towards a united opposition to face 2024 general elections. And, as she goes to Delhi, her government sets up the first panel to investigate Pegasus scandal, within Bengal, headed by retired Supreme Court judges Justice MB Lokur and Justice Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya.
The difference from 2014 and 2019 scenarios are obvious not to be missed out. This time the agenda is not to create a third front which usually remains stillborn, and to create a united front with Congress and regional parties, and to start well in advance when half the tenure of the central government is still there to go.
She is serious in her challenge is driven home through several developments: Prashant Kishore’s activism in Delhi and Mumbai, senior bureaucrat Jahar Sircar being sent to the Rajya Sabha from Trinamool Congress (TMC), attempt to engage Sharad Pawar in the Mission Mamata and perhaps convince him to be united opposition candidate for Presidential election, etc.
That Prime Minister Narendra Modi still remains the tallest leader goes without mention. And it is through a concoction of loyal media, Covid restrictions on protests, use of ED-CBI-IT, use of Hindutva and Ram Mandir, widespread communal hatred amongst a section of the voters, and TINA perception (‘there is not alternative’).
To surmount the humongous perception deficit for Mamata is a challenge, but surely there is enough of wind in her sails too, and this she made it clear with her July 21 Martyrs' Day address (electronically communicated across beyond Bengal, including Delhi and Lucknow).

West Bengal victory

The hands-down victory in Bengal which has come after a bitterly fought election campaign, marred with violence and COVID second surge in Bengal; it has given boost to a national acceptance for Mamata Banerjee among all critics of BJP. Even sections of the ruling BJP, not very happy with the high-handedness of Modi-Shah, are privately appreciative Mamata.
She being a lady, wearing sandals and cotton saree, being always on the move in spite of being in mid-60s, and her image as a street-fighter, which was on full display during her leg injury and the election campaign, has only given her a multiplier effect in public perception. 
Politics indeed is a game of perception, and Modi knows it the best. The perception game of Mamata was on full display in her much amplified address on July 21 which she delivered in three languages.

No conflict with non-Congress non-Left opposition

A major factor that goes in her favour is that her party TMC is an offshoot of the Congress like several other non BJP regional parties, and has no conflict with any regional party as she is significantly present only in Tripura, combatting BJP primarily, beyond Bengal.
Also, alongside, several regional parties like Telangana Rashtra Samithi (Telengana), YSR Congress (Andhra Pradesh), BJD, the Left, some in Northeast, and even Samajwadi Party (UP) have different grades of conflict with Congress in their respective states. 
A Mamata-led government will be a bonanza for all regional parties ruling several states in India as both Congress and now BJP have exhibited major centralizing tendencies. Interestingly, both the Left and TMC have mellowed down their mutual antagonism and are publicly noting the NDA as their common political enemy number one, now.

Bengal Model of ‘inclusive’ growth

A central aspect of the victory of TMC in Bengal for the third time was the much-touted Bengal Model of inclusive growth which created several cash-kind-support schemes focusing on women through Kanyashree & Rupashree, on health through Swastha Sathi and Health Cards for all families (with insurance up to Rs.5 lacs per family), on farmers through Krishi Mitra and Sabuj Sathi, push to artisans of Bengal, etc.
The latest in the list is the credit card system with Rs 10 lakh worth credit support to students coming for higher education. These together have created an eco-system where several positives are seen today. UNESCO has awarded Kanyashree scheme for making a qualitative difference in girl-child education. 
With 76% literacy in the state, state GDP growth at 15% before pandemic (higher than UP, Gujarat, Bihar, etc), crime rate at 195 (against 262 of UP, as per NCRB data), and per capita income at $1600 per annum (above UP, Bihar, Assam and Odisha, among others), Bengal may not be leading the nation, but is among the front-runners (largely central government or independent agency figures).
While the Gujarat model, much touted by Modi-Shah and tea, lies now exposed to have benefitted large capital, was visible more on paper than on ground, and highest children malnourishment in Gujarat, there is now the debate being raised by TMC and some intellectuals on growth versus development, impact on Human Development Index and inclusive versus exclusive development. If this approach of TMC is coupled with NYAY (minimum guaranteed income) proposal of Rs 12,000 minimum monthly income for a working adult as was proposed by Congress in 2019, the result could be an electoral winner.

Desi communication with social media punch

‘Khela Hobey’ (We Shall Play) was the winning electoral war-cry of TMC during the last elections with which they have romped home. Then, they came out with blistering attacks on BJP using music, poetry, catchy one-liners, a series of expose on the social media, and showing how the challenger was out of place with native culture of India.
The entire campaign style, guided by Prashant Kishore (erstwhile Modi-Shah consultant in 2012-14), had a heady mix of technology and rusticity, was door-to-door yet electronically conveyed, and used local lingo to the hilt. 
If this approach is taken at the national level integrating this with issues of each state and putting the locally powerful opposition party at the centre of focus, there is a winning formula for the combined opposition alliance for play on. The Bengali dance numbers on how the sandal-wearing Mamata is now out to win Delhi is already in public domain.

Prashant Kishore (PK) factor

PK as he is normally known as, has been around for a decade now. But he made history first by ensuring the victory of JDU+RJD in Bihar some six years ago, and now the biggest success in his electoral strategist’s life has been the bitter-sweet victory of his client, TMC led by Mamata, in Bengal.
Over the last two months, he has moved across India, interacted with Sharad Pawar, Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, and several other opposition leaders to ensure that a united opposition can be cobbled up with some credibility. Since he has been the consultant to TRS, Congress, SP, RJD, YSR Congress and DMK in the past, apart from TMC, it is expected that he shall play an important role in bringing the disparate opposition together. Early signs are already visible.

Olive branch to Congress

It is interesting to note that PK has met the Gandhis together and Sharad Pawar. He has noted that no opposition unity is possible without Congress, and third front is a no-brainer. Mamata has not spoken a word on federal front unlike the last time. Meanwhile, the Congress has strongly criticized the government for snooping on Abhishek Banerjee, TMC General Secretary, and TMC in response noted ‘Khela Hobey’.
There is not a single anti-Mamata statement by any central or state Congress leader since the Bengal results were announced on May 2. All these point to the same direction: Mamata is keen to get Congress on board, and Congress so far is playing ball. In fact, the pet project of PK now is to get the opposition together and agree to Sharad Pawar as presidential candidate, Mamata Banerjee as the PM face of the opposition, and Rahul Gandhi as the Deputy PM face.

Minority, liberal support; no caste identity

In Bengal, Mamata has got 48% votes this time, which includes a overwhelming support of the approximately 30% voters who are Muslims. The minorities across India look at her as an inclusive secular face, and so do a section of the liberals. ‘No Vote to BJP’ campaign by the intelligentsia of Bengal before the assembly elections did not categorically tell whom to vote for. It just noted whom not to vote for. 
That Mamata is not identified with her Brahmin surname, and that the Dalit Matua voters of Bengal have also overwhelmingly voted for her this time, is another reason of broader acceptance of Mamata in a caste-ridden politics of India.

Business lobbies

From Harsh Neotia to the Birlas, and several IT majors of India have been doing good business in Bengal and have supported Mamata in her national and global sojourns to seek investments. The Bajajs and many mid-level business houses have expressed admiration for her people-centric governance, especially in the interest of the women folks.

Modi-Shah-Yogi on back-foot

This is for the first time in seven years, the Modi-Shah are on the back-foot, with Pegasus spyware snooping controversy, COVID second surge causing havoc, more than 18 crores jobs lost in last 16 months (Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy study), India’s foreign policy failures seen repeatedly with China, Pakistan, Middle East, US, Iran etc., price-rise sky-rocketing (specially of fuel and gas that impact all commodity prices), and with a banking failure (NPAs above Rs 9 lakh crore) on one side and education on ventilator on the other (UNESCO says 52% of students did not have any education in last 16 months).
That the BJP high command, visibly at unease with Yogi Raj in UP for a long time now, had to accept his leadership for UP polls of early 2022, and even put up a brave face in his support, shows their dichotomy. Organic social media content has often trended against the government in the last one year, for the first time since Modi has become the PM.

Challenges for Mamata

All of the above only point towards a possible realignment of political forces in the opposition camp in India, which has still not happened, and will squarely rest upon the fact whether Congress agrees to play ball and accept deputy PM slot and second-ranked leadership. The competing interests of Congress and some regional forces need to be addressed amicably for any progress here.
Then the question of the state polls in 2022, especially of UP, is there, where if a united opposition can emerge and snatch victory from the incumbent BJP, there will be fire-play in national politics. The third imponderable is the possible use of hyper nationalism by Modi-Shah government (a la Pulwana-Balakot in 2019) in a situation that crops ahead of 2024 general elections.
One thing seems to be increasingly sure: the 2024 general elections may not a damp squib as the 2019 one was, and will be a deciding one for India of tomorrow.
---
*Educationist, columnist and television panelist, writes on contemporary issues of politics, media and education

Comments

TRENDING

What's behind public sector banks showing huge profits in 2nd quarter of 2022-23?

By Thomas Franco*  The quarter two results of the public sector banks (PSBs) appear to be noteworthy compared to a few years ago. All these banks showed good profits in the financial year 2021-22. Twelve PSBs made a net profit of Rs 25,685 crore in quarter 2 of FY23 and a total of Rs 40,991 crore in the first half of 2023. The combined profit of 12 banks in March 2022 was Rs 66,539 crore which was 110% more than 2021 – Rs. 31,816 crore. The Asset Quality Review of 2015 saw a surge in NPAs of PSBs jumping to Rs 8.96 lakh crore in March 2018 from Rs 2.17 lakh crore in March 2014. This was simply because the norms for NPAs were changed from 180 days to 90 days, and all restructuring of even genuine accounts was done away with. In 2018 NPA of SBI was 5.73% which has come down to 0.8% in Q2 of FY23. The NPA of Canara Bank has come down to 2.19% from 7.48% in Mar 2018. The same trend is seen in all public banks. Now SBI has seen a jump of 74% in its net profit, while Canara Bank’s profit is

Economist-editor's allegations on Narmada defamatory, baseless: Medha Patkar

Counterview Desk  In a reply directly addressed to well-known economist, journalist and columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar’s two articles in the Times of India (republished here and here ), calling them defamatory and wondering whether they were borne out of “ignorance or a conspiracy through political alliance”, Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Pakar has said that the Narmada Sardar Saravar Project and the people's movement by adivasis, farmers, labourers, fish workers, potters and all the generations’ old communities from the river valley have suddenly come to be focused on, since the Gujarat elections are in the doorstep. She believes that while the “defamatory accusations with baseless conceptions such as ‘urban naxals’ are to be laughed at as the electoral strategic moves, one gets shocked to read the articles by a known old columnist like Swaminathan Ankalesaria Aiyar, published in a reputed daily like the Times of India." According to her, Aiyar’s two articl

Business back to normal? IIM-A survey says, sales expectations have sharply improved

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management’s Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES), which polls a panel of business leaders to find out their perception of slack in economy, including their inflation expectations, year-ahead cost expectations and the factors influencing price changes, such as profit and sales levels, etc., has said that the cost perceptions data indicates signs of moderation in price pressures. Carried out for September, the survey says, the cost pressure of the reporting firms has shifted from “very significant increase (over 6%) to moderate increase (3.1% to 6%).” It adds, “The percentage of firms perceiving over 10% cost increase y-o-y has declined. Over 21% of the firms in September 2022 round of the survey perceive that costs have increased very significantly (over 10%) – down from 26% recorded in August 2022.” Claiming to be a unique survey, in that it goes straight to businesses -- the price setters -- rather than to consumers or household

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Hindutva groups threat to peace, freedom: US diaspora groups tell FBI, other govt depts

By Our Representative  The Islamophobic and neo-Nazi ideology of Hindutva is a clear and present danger to peace and freedoms in the United States, a coalition of civil rights organizations told key officials of the U.S. Attorney General’s Office, the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) at a recent event in Edison, New Jersey. At the event titled United Against Hate, activists from American Muslims for Democracy (AMD), Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR) and Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) made detailed presentations on this ideology of Hindu supremacism that is committing mass persecution of India’s Muslims and Christians and is rearing its ugly head in New Jersey as well as across the US. Attending the event were David S Leonardis, Special Investigator from the New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety; Michael E Campion, Chief of the Civil Rights Division for the US Attorney General's Office; and Jonathan R Norbut of the U.S. Dep

GoI's productivity linked incentives to corporates 'without independent analysis'

Counterview Desk  Wondering how prudent is the Government of India's (GoI's) Productivity Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme, EAS Sarma, former secretary, GoI, in a representation to Nirmala Sitharaman, Union finance minister, has said it appears to be nothing more than subsidy to the private sector without any responsibility. Giving a specific example against the backdrop of announcement of 50% subsidy covering the project cost of the Vedanta Group's decision to set up a semiconductor fabrication plant in Gujarat, in collaboration with Foxconn, Sarma says, "The total cost of this project is reported to be Rs 1,54,000 crore. 50% of this works out to Rs 77,000 crore." Stating that this creates the impression that the entire subsidy allocation for the semiconductor manufacturing sector would be appropriated by this company, Sarma says, "The Gujarat government did not lag behind in liberally announcing similar incentives for the Vedanta-Foxconn project. It offered 7

As polls approach, electorate 'failing to realise': Gujarat model is in a shambles

By DN Rath*  Gujarat assembly elections, scheduled to be held on 1 and 5 December 2022, is viewed by many as dress rehearsal for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. When the suffering people have been pointing towards redressal of some local issues like absence of cleanliness, sewage problem, shortage of water supply, troubles created by stray cattle, insufficiency of streetlights, etc., it is evident that they are not fully aware that assembly elections are being fought on ideological standpoints and policy decisions. Nor is there the realisation that the state is in a shambles and the much-trumpeted ‘Gujarat model’ of development has proved to be a hoax. Like other states, the people of Gujarat are also back-broken by steep rise in prices to the tune of 400% in last 20 years. It is not that the government cannot control the spurt in prices if it so wants. Apart from the fact that price rise is an inevitability in a capitalist economy, artificial shortage triggered by massive hoarding, b

BJP poll gimmick? Bilkis Bano rape case 'pardon' vs Rajiv assassins' release

By Sandeep Pandey*  Supreme Court has released six convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. This was bound to happen as earlier AG Perarivalan was released in the same case, setting a precedent. Even though four of them are Sri Lankans but a popular Tamil sentiment favoured the release of these convicts which is why Tamil political parties supported this and resolutions were passed by different governments in Tamil Nadu to his effect.  Rajiv Gandhi paid the price of sending Indian Peace Keeping Force to Sri Lanka where it got entangled with Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and eventually the whole operation ended up is a fiasco.  However, most importantly Sonia and Priyanka Gandhi and probably Rahul too do not have any objections to the release of these convicts. In fact, Sonia Gandhi played an important role in getting the death sentence of the only lady among the convicts Nalini commuted to life term through the Tamil Nadu Governor. Priyanka visited Nalini in Vellore Jail and

Amit Shah accused of inciting communal passion: Demand to postpone Gujarat polls

Counterview Desk  In an email representation to the Election Commission of India (ECI), Dr EAS Sarma, former secretary to the Government of India, has objected to the statement reported to have been made by Union home minister Amit Shah, who allegedly justified the 2002 Gujarat riots stating that certain sections of people “taught a lesson” to the rioters. Noting that the statement, if correct, “in effect implies those other than the law enforcement authorities had taken law into their hands”, Sarma says, “Shah's statement needs to be viewed by the ECI in conjunction with the reported fact that it was the Union Home Ministry that cleared the release of the eleven rape convicts in the Bilkis Bano case, directly related to the infamous Godhra incidents in 2002, which triggered the shameful sequence of events that shook the nation's conscience.” According to Sarma, if the statement is true, “I am constrained to draw the inevitable inference that it would have already impacted th