Skip to main content

Ahmedabad slum dwellers lathicharged: Demand for basic amenities for settlements

By A Representative 

Ahmedabad police allegedly used brute force to break up an assembly of migrant workers demanding decent housing. Hundreds of workers had gathered before the district collector’s office, Ahmedabad, to submit a memorandum to the district collector demanding that their settlement be enumerated as slums and basic services like light and drinking water be provided.
The workers had sought permission for a rally that was denied late at night. Subsequently they decided to assemble peacefully in a corner on the sidewalk near the district collector’s office and give memorandum to the district collector. However, the police broke up the assembly using batons.
Twenty-two people, including the president of the Union Hirabhai and secretary Minaben and leaders of the Struggle Committee, were detained. All of them were released in late afternoon and allowed to submit a memorandum to the district collector.
Those detained include union activists Dinesh Parmar, Ashok Parmar, and Shanti Lal Meena. During the baton charge, a woman leader, Magiben, was injured. She had to be hospitalized by calling an ambulance. Rest of the assembly was forced to disperse.
The workers are residents of some 40 settlements of Ahmedabad, inhabited by seasonal and permanent migrants to the city, said Mina Jadhav of the Majuar Adhikar Manch, which had organised the protest. The settlements are not recognized by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) and bulldozed frequently without any resettlement. Recently, people staying put at Fatewadi near Juhapura were evicted.
The workers have been raising their, demands for last ten year, said Jadhav. The demands include government undertake a survey of unrecognized settlements where they are living; basic public services like sanitation, drinking water, paved roads, and electricity be immediately provided to all the settlements; and no eviction should be carried out without due process of proper rehabilitation.
The demonstrators also demanded revision of the Gujarat Slum Rehabilitation Policy, which promotes public private partnership; shelter for persons counted as homeless in 2018 by the government; implementation of the recently announced Affordable Rental Housing Scheme for migrant workers; and shelters for urban homeless designed to provide accommodation to families who come from outside Ahmedabad.

Comments

TRENDING

Bihar’s land at ₹1 per acre for Adani sparks outrage, NAPM calls it crony capitalism

By A Representative   The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has strongly condemned the Bihar government’s decision to lease 1,050 acres of land in Pirpainti, Bhagalpur district, to Adani Power for a 2,400 MW coal-based thermal power project. 

"Forcible" tribal eviction: Central India village draws international attention following NGO representation

Government building in Amravan By A Representative A small village of about 200 in Central India, a majority of whose residents is dependent on mining as the main source of livelihood, is all set to become a major focal point, nationally and internationally. Reason: Allegations of refusal of the Madhya Pradesh government to protect them from forcible eviction from their land.

An open letter to PM: Before you forgive, ask for forgiveness

By Martin Macwan*  Respected Prime Minister,  The first step toward true forgiveness is asking for it, and it is out of respect for the Constitution that the title "Honourable" is used for the office of the Prime Minister. Every abuse is "dirty" because almost all abuse is uttered with the conscious intention of publicly humiliating a woman, much like the disrobing of Draupadi in the royal court. This includes remarks like "Jersey Cow," used at public meetings on the Gujarati land of Gandhi and Sardar; comparing a female MP's laughter in India's Parliament to "Surpanakha's laugh"; and using a vulgar address like "Didi O Didi" for a Chief Minister who holds a respected position in a democracy—along with every other such remark. In the 79-year history of independent India, you are better placed than anyone to say which Prime Minister has used such language against women.