Skip to main content

Time to ponder: Why activists, politicians target Ambani, Adani, 'spare' Tata, Birla

By NS Venkataraman*

The names of Ambani and Adani are being frequently mentioned by critics – especially activists and politicians – in an attempt to paint the two industrialists as exploiters and anti-nationals in the ongoing debate in India with regard to three farm laws enacted by the Modi government. The view is that the farm laws have only benefited the two industrial groups. Even a section of media is highlighting such a view.
Even the Government of India’s privatization measures for public sector undertakings are being interpreted as measures to benefit Ambani and Adani. There is however little discussion about merits or demerits of the government move. Loopholes, even those have little basis, are rarely sought to be identified.
The campaign against the two industrialists is so persistent that the common man, who has little to do with business activities or are not much educated, tends to believe that they are bad guys.
Ironically, these critics have left out other business groups such as Tata, Birla and others. The critics seem to think that the pace of achievements and initiatives in promoting industrial growth in India by Adani and Ambani groups are far greater than that of other groups, hence criticising them would get more attention.
No doubt, the pace of achievement by the Adani and Ambani groups has been faster. This helps critics make people them believe that they are also anti-poor. The two industrialist groups in recent years have set up more industries and economic enterprises than others.
Thanks to their faster growth, they have ably projected their claim of creating direct or indirect jobs for thousands, even as adhering to government rules and environmental regulations.
Indeed, the Ambani group has set up the largest petrochemical complex in India of world size and is now in a position to compete with international giants. It has also diversified into other areas such as communication and retail, thus bringing about a hitherto unknown speed and standard to business.
As for the Adani group, it has set up several renewable energy plants in India, even as involving itself in setting up sea ports. It has set up the largest solar power plant in India in record time. The plant is said to be operating well.
They have helped create the perception that the progress in Indian industrial and economic growth would be markedly less today without their investments and projects.
While other industrial groups as also state-supported enterprises too appear to be striving hard to set up projects, what is conspicuous is, the Ambani and Adani groups have moved into uncharted areas. This has invited sharp criticism from several quarters questioning their closeness with the government. Facts and figure show the spectacular performance of the two groups in a comparatively shorter period of time.
Government’s privatization measures for public sector undertakings are being interpreted as measures to benefit Ambani and Adani
When they go in for such massive projects, there have been problems and failures, too. In the Krishna Godavari gas exploration project, the Reliance Industries belonging to Mukesh Ambani has not been able to produce gas as per expectations. The government has imposed penalty on Reliance, and things are under litigation. Despite this failure, Reliance has joined with the British Petroleum to produce gas from new wells.
The Adani group, entrusted with the task of administering airports, has been under criticism for being favoured. Protagonists of the Adani group argue, however, that the group’s bid was better than that of others, the reason why it has won the contracts.
Meanwhile, efforts by private sector to promote industrialization and economic growth is being decried by activists and leftist politicians. The argument against privatization of public sector has become their trump card. They appear to ignore the view that the government’s job is to govern, not to do business. Even communist China promotes private business.
Entrusting the responsibility for promoting industrial and economic growth to private sector to some extent is not only logical step but also the need of the day for economic growth. No doubt, some private sector companies indulge in tax evasion and malpractices. Corrupt elements have to be punished, whether they are private sector promoters or elsewhere.
The fact is, the critics of Ambani and Adani have failed to come up with an alternative model which could contribute to economic and industrial growth of the country and create jobs. Indeed, loudspeakers cannot be a substitute to likes of Ambani and Adani.
---
Trustee, Nandini Voice for The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

Anonymous said…
Crony capitalists. Some capitalists survive and thrive at the expense of India. One simply needs to start way back to the early 70's and trace the history of one of the industrialists and for the other since the bjp tenure in Gujarat. In addition one can look at changes in laws and laws flouted for both the industrialists. Not that all industrialists do not do such acts - but some more than others.

TRENDING

Reducing emission? India among top nations whose coal as energy source going up

By NS Venkataraman*  The State of the Global Climate report by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) confirmed that the year 2023 was the warmest year on record, with the global temperature of 1.4 degree celsius above pre-industrial 1850-1900 base line.

Lockdown 'total failure' of science more than of politics: Open letter on 4th anniversary

Counterview Desk  In an open letter to fellow academicians, scientists and medical practitioners in India, marking the fourth anniversary of India's lockdown (25 March 2024), the Managing Committee* of the Universal Health Organisation (UHO) has insisted on the need to "repair two years of immense damage to science".

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

'Wrong direction': Paris NGO regrets MNC ArcelorMittal still using coal-based steel

By Rajiv Shah  A new report by Paris-based non-governmental research and campaigning organization, Reclaim Finance, has blamed the MNC ArcelorMittal – formed in 2006 following the takeover and merger of the western European steel maker Arcelor (Spain, France, and Luxembourg) by Indian-owned Mittal Steel – for using use “climate destructive” metallurgical coal for its projects in India.

Attack on foreign students: Gujarat varsity's reputation, ranking at stake, say academics

Counterview Desk  Expressing anguish over the attack on international students in Gujarat University hostels, a letter claimed to have been signed by 122 current and former academics has asked the Gujarat Vice Chancellor, Dr Neerja Gupta, to provide emotional support to the attacked students and to ensure their physical safety.  

Poor private sector engagement 'impacting' carbon pricing policy in Global South

Counterview Desk  The joint report by Environmental Defense Fund and Observer Research Fund, "Navigating Carbon Pricing: The G20 Experience and Global South Prospects", delves into the complex landscape of carbon pricing, examining its application within the G20 nations and the potential implications for emerging economies in the Global South.  The report claims to provide insights and recommendations for effective carbon pricing strategies in diverse economies.  A note: The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and Observer Research Foundation (ORF) have launched the Navigating Carbon Pricing: The G20 Experience and Global South Prospects” report. The report delves into the complex landscape of carbon pricing, examining its application within the G20 nations and the potential implications for emerging economies in the Global South. The report offers a comprehensive analysis of various carbon pricing instruments currently in existence, providing valuable i