Skip to main content

Transgender community 'shocked' at timing, manner of seeking feedback on draft rules

By Our Representative
Responding to the “announcement” by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (MoSJE) seeking public feedback for the draft rules of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, more than 150 members of the transgender community in a letter to the minister of social justice and empowerment have strongly protested against a very limited time period of 12 days for sending suggestions, that too during lockdown.
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 received presidential assent on January 10, 2020. The draft rules were placed on the MoSJE website on April 18, and the last date for getting suggestions ends on April 30. 
Stating that they are “shocked” to note the timing and manner of ‘seeking feedback’, the signatories say, under the “mandatory lockdown regime” millions of working people, “including the entire transgender community has been facing a severe crisis of survival, food insecurity, lack of access to healthcare and livelihood.”
Asserting that they have not been offered any “supportive package” either, the letter says, they have “serious reservations regarding the non-consultative manner in which the Act was passed as well as many of the deeply problematic provisions in the Act, which fundamentally go against the grain of National Legal Services Authority of India (NALSA) judgment as well as our constitutional rights as equal citizens.”
The letter says, the government should be “very much aware that the constitutional vires of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019” which is “impugned” before the Supreme Court, in multiple petitions. “Since the matter is sub judice, it would be in the fitness of things to await the verdict of the Court, before proceeding with any rule-making process”, it adds.
All details pertaining to the proposed rules must be placed in public domain for at least 30 days and communicated to public at large
Further, the letter says, the announcement for feedback “is inconsistent with the Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy (PLCP), 2014 of the Government of India, which must invariably be followed by all Ministries and Departments in formulating principal and sub-ordinate legislation (rule-making).”
According to this policy, “All details pertaining to the proposed Bill/ Rules must be placed in public domain for a period of at least 30 days and communicated to public at large through print, electronic, audio and visual means. The policy also envisages a process for consultation with the specific communities/ groups affected by such laws/ rules.”
Also protesting against the rules having been placed “only on the website and in English, while a majority of the community neither has access to web-based portals or the English language”, the letter says, “An Act which claims to be ‘inclusive’ cannot adopt a rule-making process so exclusionary.”
Demanding that the MoSJE should not to proceed with the rule-making process till the matter of the Act’s constitutionality is cleared by the Supreme Court, the letter says, the government should not go ahead it them till “the lockdown is fully lifted and the situation of transgender people returns to at least a degree of ‘pre-lockdown normalcy’.”

Comments

TRENDING

India's GDP down by 50%, not 23%, job loss 200 million not 122 million: Top economist

By Our Representative One of India’s topmost economists has estimated that India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) decline was around 50%, and not 23%, as claimed by the Government of India’s top data body, National Statistical Organization (NSO). Prof Arun Kumar, who is Malcolm S Adiseshiah chair professor, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi, said this was delivering a web policy speech, organised by the Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), New Delhi.

JP advised RSS to give up Hindu Rashtra, disband itself: Ex-IAS officer tells Modi

Counterview Desk
Major MG Devasahayam IAS (Retd), chairman, People-First, in an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the occasion of Jayprakash Narain’s (JP’s) death anniversary (October 11) has wondered whether he remembers “a patriot called Jayaprakash Narayan”. Recalling what JP thought on issues such as communalism, freedom, democracy, Hindutva etc., Devasahayam says, Modi has been been doing “the very opposite of the principles and values for which JP lived and died.”

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

UP chief secretary, DGP have 'surrendered' to political diktat: 92 retired IAS, IPS officials

Counterview Desk
In an open letter to Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath, 92 retired IAS, IFS and IPS bureaucrats, commenting on “blatant violations of the rule law” following the Hathras incident, have blamed that the Chief Secretary and the Director General of Police for abjectly failing to exercise control over a “highly compromised” administration the state.

Gujarat literati flutter: State Akademi autonomy curb a Sahitya Parishad poll issue?

By Dankesh Oza*
The 115-year-old Gujarati Sahitya Parishad is in election mode. More than 3,000 life members of the Parishad are set to elect its 52nd president and 40 plus central working committee (CWC) members, which in turn will elect its executive and two vice presidents, six secretaries and a treasurer for the coming three years (from 2021 to 2023).

Hathras reflects Manu's mindset dominates: 'Women are false, it's in their nature to seduce'

By Parijat Ghosh, Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
The woman died and then we woke up to protest. She was alive for two weeks after the heinous incident. Many of us even didn’t notice what had happened at Hathras, how she fought during the next 15 days. Those who noticed, many of them were not sure what actually had happened. So much so, we as a nation were more busy in finding out who among the Bollywood actresses were taking drugs, who smoked weed, who had ‘inappropriate’ or more than one relationship, what kind of private conversations they had in their chat boxes and what not!

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Delhi riots: Even British didn't accuse Bhagat Singh of reading Lenin, Jack London

By Vikash Narain Rai*
After the #BlackLifeMatters movement seriously tested the credibility of police across America, the Houston police chief Art Acevado talked of ending “lawful but awful” policing. No comparison, but in India, a citizens’ committee comprising former top judges and bureaucrats is now set to inquire into the role of the state machinery and media in handling the February 2020 Delhi violence, which followed protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), “as the investigation by the Delhi Police has evoked extensive critical commentary in recent times.”

Atrocities against Dalits: Why don't MPs, MLAs from the community ever speak up?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
In Gujarat, a young Dalit activist lawyer Devji Maheshwari, belonging to the Backward and Minority Communities Employees Federation (BAMSCEF) was killed in Surat, allegedly by a goon who was warning him against his Facebook posts not to speak up against Brahmanism. Facts have come to light suggesting there are other issues also which led to the murder, mostly related to land disputes, many a time ignored by activists.