Skip to main content

Citizenship law: Would Govt of India give in to 'mob' pressure? There is precedent

By NS Venkataraman*
The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was passed in both the houses of Indian Parliament after majority of members voted in favour of the Act. The immigrant issue emerged following the partition of India in 1947. Several prime pinisters in the past, including those of the Congress. wanted to regularize citizenship in India , but they were not courageous enough to catch the bull by the horn.
Now, the Modi government has tackled the issue. CAA was extensively discussed in both the houses of Parliament, highlighting the pluses and minuses of the issue. Finally, the majority opinion prevailed. In a healthy democracy and orderly society, it is necessary that the majority opinion is accepted gracefully by all concerned.
Some political parties and activists wanted to defy the decision of Parliament. They whipped up public agitation against CAA, incited hatred and violence, leading to bitter confrontation. This has tarnished the image of India as a progressive and forward-looking nation.
The anti-CAA agitation was supposed to have been started by the student community, many of whom are politicians in the making. It was taken over by political parties and activists and a section of the media, which gave wide publicity to protests, refusing to condemn violence.
Destruction of public property and setting on fire police vehicles and police stations were justified by some opposition leaders, activists and media, as if all this reflected the anger of the people. It amounted to justifying violence and hooliganism.
Some opposition leaders and activists want the CAA issue should be taken to the United Nations. It seems these type of statements have emanated out of frustration, as they could not defeat Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the last elections. Now they want to defeat him on streets by encouraging violence and creating law and order problems.
India consist of more than 1,300 million people. Those indulging in violence are just a few hundreds. They do not represent India, nor do they reflect the overall view of the majority of people. They disrupted normal life without understanding about the limits of democracy. Freedom cannot be absolute, it has limits.
They disrupted normal life without understanding limits of democracy. Freedom cannot be absolute, it has limits
The issue that concerns one and all is, will mob violence force the government to take decisions? If this happens, what will be the future of India? We are on a critical crossroad. The Government of India must act with determination, using carrot and stick approach. The issue of CAA has to be explained to the people by the government, as suggested by the Chief Justice of India.
India’s stability would be threatened if mob psychology is allowed to prevail. It may very well happen. There have been precedents. Several projects have been stopped or suspended in the recent past following public protests, many of them supported by political parties and activists, even though the authorities had carried out detailed investigation and approved them.
In several cases, state governments, and sometimes even the Central government, have bowed to the will of the mob. In the process, India has lost many opportunities. This situation cannot be allowed to continue any longer.
The government has the great responsibility of putting down negative elements with all the force at its command for the sake of long-term stability and progress of India. This would be very much in keeping with the spirit of democracy and protect it.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

India under Modi among top 10 autocratizing nations, on verge of 'losing' democracy status

By Rajiv Shah
A new report, prepared by a top Swedish institute studying liberal democracy, has observed that there has been a sharp “dive in press freedom along with increasing repression of civil society in India associated with the current Hindu-nationalist regime of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.” The report places India among the top 10 countries that “have autocratized the most”. Other countries that have been identified for rolling towards autocracy are -- Hungary, Turkey, Poland, Serbia, Brazil, Mali, Thailand, Nicaragua and Zambia.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Border conflict? RBI nod India's 'brotherly' help to China internationalise its currency

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
In the middle of a global pandemic, China started an unprovoked border conflict with India. It unraveled trust deficit and ties between the two neighbours. As thousands of Chinese troops tried occupying Indian territory, the Narendra Modi-led BJP government directs the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to allow the Bank of China to start regular banking services in India. The Bank of China will now operate in India like any other commercial banks.

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

By Shamsul Islam*
National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

Clean chit to British rulers, Muslim League? Karnataka to have Veer Savarkar flyovers

By Shamsul Islam*
The BJP government of Karnataka led by BS Yediyurappa is going to honour Hindutva icon VD Savarkar by naming two of the newly built major flyovers in Bangalore and Mangalore after him. There was a huge uproar against this decision of the RSS-BJP government as many pro-Kannada organisations with opposition parties and liberal-secular organizations questioned the logic to ignore so many freedom fighters, social reformers and others from within the state.

Letter to friends, mentors: Coming together of class, communal, corona viruses 'scary'

By Prof (Dr) Mansee Bal Bhargava*
COVID greetings from Ahmedabad to dear mentors and friends from around the world…
I hope you are keeping well and taking care of yourself besides caring for the people around you. I’m writing to learn how is the science and the society coping with the prevention and cure of the pandemic. I’m also writing to share the state of the corona virus that is further complicated with the long-standing class and communal viruses.

Hurried nod to Western Ghat projects: 16 lakh Goans' water security 'jeopardised'

Counterview Desk
Taking strong exception to "virtual clearances" to eco-sensitive projects in the Western Ghats, the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) in a statement has said urged for a review of the four-lane highway, 400 KV transmission line and double tracking of the railway line through the Bhagwan Mahavir Wildlife Sanctuary and Mollem National Park in Goa.

Disturbing signal? Reliance 'shifting focus' away from Indian petrochemical sector

By NS Venkataraman*
Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), a large Indian company, has expanded and grown in a spectacular manner during the last few decades, like of which no industrial group in India has performed before. RIL is now involved in multi various activities relating to petroleum refineries, petrochemicals, oil and gas exploration, coal bed methane, life sciences, retail business, communication network, (Jio platform) media/entertainment etc.

Case for nationalising India's healthcare system amidst 'strong' private control

Counterview Desk
A draft discussion note, prepared by Dr Maya Valecha, a Gujarat-based gynecologist and activist, sent to the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) as also a large number of activists, academics and professionals as an email alert, is all set to create a flutter among policy experts for its strong insistence on nationalizing India’s healthcare system.