Skip to main content

History 'will remember' 2019 for silencing dissent, democracy, human rights

By V Suresh*
In the annals of contemporary Indian human rights history 2019 will be marked as the year when the Indian state – the Government of India – exhibited its near total disdain for human rights and rule of law by committing, not by individual or localized acts of human rights abuse alone; in a dramatic manner, the Government exhibited its might in a colossal, huge, collective and fearsome manner its utter disrespect for constitutional values and ethics and that it considered fundamental freedoms and human rights as mere scraps of paper.
Two events stand out for the sheer magnitude and scale of the egregious state action and what it indicates for the future of human rights in India. First is the stealthy and sinister manner by which Article 370 regarding special the status for Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) was abrogated on August 5, 2019, putting with immediate effect an entire state of over 8 million Kashmiris in the Valley under lock down mode resulting in unimaginable misery to local people.
At an equally fearsome and hugely mind boggling manner was the completion under the supervision of the recently retired chief justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi, of the NRC (National Register of citizens) process in Assam declaring over 19 lakh people as foreigners and directing their detention in Special Camps. The completion of the state wide NRC exercise in Assam, exhibited the callousness, cruelty and heartless manner to which such a process will eventually degenerate into.
Scores of distraught families found some members of the family declared as citizens and others as foreigners, pushing scores of people to commit suicide. On August 31, 2019, the final list of people excluded from the NRC was published, showing 19,06,657 persons to be excluded. Even if it is argued that these persons have the right to appeal this finding, the sheer sense of insecurity and personal/family human tragedy this process has triggered is unprecedented.
The NDA Modi-Shah led government showed that the NRC exercise was not meant just for Assam but they intended to roll it out throughout the country as an exercise to find out foreigners. In real terms, the NRC exercise has been aimed at Muslims, and the announcement of nationwide NRC exercise has already sent shockwaves amongst the wider section of Muslim community across many states.
A number of BJP-led states like Karnataka and Maharashtra (which was under BJP rule till now), have already announced having detained people in special camps to be detained to Bangladesh. What is most worrying about these macro-level egregious forms of human rights abuse is the near total capitulation of all democratic and constitutional institutions meant to act as checks and balances to the State usurping or aggrandizing all powers to become a huge totalitarian or fascist state.
No institution has been left untouched or uncompromised: from the CBI to the Enforcement Directorate, to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Election Commission, just about all institutions have been either forced to cow down or manned in such a way that they bow down to the power of the Government.
In this dismal scenario, the Constitutional Courts – the Supreme Court as also the High courts – envisioned by the Constitution framers as the sentinels of the Constitution, protector s of fundamental rights and meant to be a bulwark to protect citizens and communities from being crushed by the all-powerful state, have unfortunately not risen to the occasion.
Even in the face of credible information evidencing the largescale humanitarian crisis unfolding in Kashmir, and despite reports of widespread medical and mental health issues affecting thousands of people, the SC did not feel compelled to challenge the government's claim of normalcy and that people in Kashmir welcomed the shutdown.
Almost all institutions have been either forced to cow down or manned in such a way that they bow down to the power of the Government
This when there was considerable evidence to the contrary before the court itself. Scores of mainstream political leaders, including 3 former Chief Minister's have been kept in confinement; yet the SC has not felt it an urgent issue of rights violation sufficient for it to intervene. The acme of the Court' s prevarication on conflicts concerning majoritarian issues and politics came to the fore in the unanimous ruling of the 5-judge Constitution Bench in the Ayodhya- Babri Masjid case delivered on November 9, 2019.
What is baffling is that despite the Bench coming to an unanimous finding regarding the demolition of the Babri Masjid on December 6, 1992 by remarking that “… the destruction and the obliteration of the Islamic structure was an egregious violation of law” the Court goes on to hand over the entire site to the Hindus for constructing a temple while directing the government to give a 5-acre plot of land in Ayodhya for constructing a mosque.
While the aim to bring about a closure and conclusion to the Masjid-Mandir dispute is welcome, the reasoning adopted and other issues have raised more debate and dispute than resolving the issue. Numerous other instances of mass human rights violations have regularly surfaced.
These include recent reports that over 10,000 tribals have been booked for sedition in a few tribal districts of Jharkhand for challenging development projects in their areas. Sedition cases also came to be filed against 49 prominent writers, film makers and others who wrote to the Prime Minister against widespread hate crimes and intolerance in the country.
Lynchings continue to be reported regularly from across the country. What stands out in many such instances of widespread rights violations is the partial and dubious role of the police, the protectors of law, who routinely and brazenly support the ruling government and its political groups.
The custodians of law become emboldened to abuse the law with a sense of impunity because of the failure of existing Constitutional and Democratic institutions, especially the Courts, to question them and demand accountability for abusing the law or violating the rule of law. This then is the challenge before the human rights movement in India: of a situation highlighted by the failure of democratic institutions to enforce the rule of law.
A higher responsibility now rests on us, as citizens, to be more vigilant and willing to speak truth to power; to assert that we will not remain quiet and mute spectators as the powers-that-be try to subvert and bend democratic and constitutional institutions. We will have to continuously oppose the attempt of the Indian state to silence voices of dissent, democracy and human rights.
We will have to be prepared to work continuously to enforce the rule of law and assert the primacy of fundamental rights and directive principles of the Indian Constitution. Ours is the task to build a transparent, inclusive, accountable, socially just and democratic way of life.
The words of the former UN Human Rights Commissioner, Zeid Raad Al Hussein best illustrates the challenge before us, “Ultimately, it is the law that will safeguard our societies – human rights law, binding law which is the distillation of human experience, of generations of human suffering, the screams of the victims of past crimes and hate. We must guard this law passionately, and be guided by it.”
---
*General Secretary, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), National. Source: PUCL Bulletin (December)

Comments

TRENDING

India under Modi among top 10 autocratizing nations, on verge of 'losing' democracy status

By Rajiv Shah
A new report, prepared by a top Swedish institute studying liberal democracy, has observed that there has been a sharp “dive in press freedom along with increasing repression of civil society in India associated with the current Hindu-nationalist regime of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.” The report places India among the top 10 countries that “have autocratized the most”. Other countries that have been identified for rolling towards autocracy are -- Hungary, Turkey, Poland, Serbia, Brazil, Mali, Thailand, Nicaragua and Zambia.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Gujarat link of controversial US doctor who 'forced' WHO quiz Trump's wonder drug

By Rajiv Shah
A top American doctor, Sapan Sharankishor Desai, born and raised in the “affluent” North Shore (Chicago) region of Illinois by Indian parents, at one point of time involved in NGO activity through  dedicated to “improving” the lives of the impoverished in Gujarat, is in the eyes of a major international storm following his paper (retracted) in a “Lancet” questioning Donald Trump-promoted drug hydroxychloroquine.

Border conflict? RBI nod India's 'brotherly' help to China internationalise its currency

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
In the middle of a global pandemic, China started an unprovoked border conflict with India. It unraveled trust deficit and ties between the two neighbours. As thousands of Chinese troops tried occupying Indian territory, the Narendra Modi-led BJP government directs the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to allow the Bank of China to start regular banking services in India. The Bank of China will now operate in India like any other commercial banks.

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

By Shamsul Islam*
National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

Clean chit to British rulers, Muslim League? Karnataka to have Veer Savarkar flyovers

By Shamsul Islam*
The BJP government of Karnataka led by BS Yediyurappa is going to honour Hindutva icon VD Savarkar by naming two of the newly built major flyovers in Bangalore and Mangalore after him. There was a huge uproar against this decision of the RSS-BJP government as many pro-Kannada organisations with opposition parties and liberal-secular organizations questioned the logic to ignore so many freedom fighters, social reformers and others from within the state.

Hurried nod to Western Ghat projects: 16 lakh Goans' water security 'jeopardised'

Counterview Desk
Taking strong exception to "virtual clearances" to eco-sensitive projects in the Western Ghats, the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) in a statement has said urged for a review of the four-lane highway, 400 KV transmission line and double tracking of the railway line through the Bhagwan Mahavir Wildlife Sanctuary and Mollem National Park in Goa.

Disturbing signal? Reliance 'shifting focus' away from Indian petrochemical sector

By NS Venkataraman*
Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), a large Indian company, has expanded and grown in a spectacular manner during the last few decades, like of which no industrial group in India has performed before. RIL is now involved in multi various activities relating to petroleum refineries, petrochemicals, oil and gas exploration, coal bed methane, life sciences, retail business, communication network, (Jio platform) media/entertainment etc.

Case for nationalising India's healthcare system amidst 'strong' private control

Counterview Desk
A draft discussion note, prepared by Dr Maya Valecha, a Gujarat-based gynecologist and activist, sent to the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) as also a large number of activists, academics and professionals as an email alert, is all set to create a flutter among policy experts for its strong insistence on nationalizing India’s healthcare system.