Skip to main content

PUCL: Citizenship law to create new class of subordinated citizens with restricted rights

Counterview Desk
In a statement, Ravi Kiran Jain, national president, and Dr V Suresh, national general secretary, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) have expressed concern that, following the passing of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act in Parliament, religion will be the "key determinant for obtaining Indian citizenship", with "communal, anti-Muslim bias inbuilt" into it.
"Part of the strategy to consolidate majority Hindu sentiment is by continuously stoking the fire of communal difference, hatred and intolerance while remaining strategically silent when violence engulfed India through lynchings, mob killings and mass violence in the last few years", the statement said.

Text:

PUCL deplores the promulgation of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), 2019 on December 12, as a law which renders asunder the basic structure of India’s constitutional scheme founded on the stated goals of secularism, respect for diversity and peaceful coexistence of all communities, without distinction of community, caste, creed or other differences.
PUCL declares that, collectively with others, it will work towards restoration of universal principles of citizenship in India. The key thrust of the new Citizenship Act changes the essence of the Constitution, altering the basic principles of universality of citizenship which was obtained irrespective of race, sex, religion, and place of birth.
Citizenship now will have religion as a key determinant for obtaining Indian citizenship since the Citizens (Amendment) Bill (CAB) will now include all religions of the region (Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, Buddhism, Parsis and Christians) while very conspicuously excluding Islam.
While the CAB hides behind the veil of being in favour of persecuted minorities of the three neighboring Muslim majority countries, the pith and substances of the Amendment strips away the secular value of the Constitution which "We, the people of India" had given to ourselves.
It is a matter of supreme irony that while the rest of the world woke up to December 10, 2019, celebrated globally as International Human Rights Day, we in India woke up on December 10 to witness the virtual desecration of the key human rights principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution which values respecting diversity, ensuring equality amongst all communities and promoting co-existence, secularism and communal harmony.
In the early hours of December 10, 2019, the Lok Sabha voted in favour of differentiating and discriminating persecuted people who seek refuge in India in terms of `Muslims versus other religions’.
The dark irony in the deliberate action of the NDA government brazenly rushing through a discriminatory draconian law on human rights day was not lost on the rest of the world, as numerous countries condemned the passage of the communally-oriented Citizenship Amendment Bill. The most odious aspect of the CAA is the communal, anti-Muslim bias inbuilt into the law.
Thus, a law meant to protect people who face `religiously persecution’ in countries neighbouring India and seeking refuge in our country, provides that only persons belonging to `minority’ communities like Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from the Muslim majority countries of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan will not be treated as `illegal migrants’.
Though the terms `religious persecution’ and 'minority community’ are not present in the CAA itself, it refers to the Rules under the Foreigners Act, 2016 which clearly refer to these terms.
Even if religious persecution is the criteria, the flaws and contradictions in this legal formulation stands exposed by the fact that there are numerous communities within the larger Muslim community in Pakistan who face immense 'religious persecution’.
The Ahmadiya community, the Shia Muslims and the Balochs have historically been facing harsh persecution with repeated bombings, mass killings and immense violence at the hands of the dominant Sunni Muslim community in Pakistan.
Similarly the 'Hazara’ community in Afghanistan, also face religious persecution forcing them to seek exile in other countries, including India. Religious persecution is not only inter-religious; but as we can see the various Islamic sects with different practices are also under immense violent persecution.
It is really sad as how the CAA has deliberately left out of the ambit of the definition of `religiously persecuted minorities’ the tens of thousands of Rohingya Muslim refugees who have been declared as the most persecuted community of the world, facing ethnic cleansing and genocide from the murderous Buddhist Myanmar military regime.
All these cases are deserving of grant of citizenship by a civilized country, for being victims of the inhuman provisions of the religion patronised by their government. Equally condemnable is that the CAA is silent on providing protection to over hundred thousand Sri Lankan Tamil refugees who fled the 30-year war and ethnic cleansing in north Sri Lanka and who have been in India for periods ranging from 10 to 30 years.
Sri Lanka has recently seen a regime change with Gotabaya Rajapakse, accused by the Tamils as the architect of the genocidal war in 2008-09, as the new President of Sri Lanka. In these circumstances it’s impossible for the Sri Lankan refugees in India to have confidence to go back to Sri Lanka.
The BJP government has mercilessly dumped these Tamil refugees to the dustbin of history, a shameful commentary on the international image of India as a country of peace.
It is well know that from the time of independence, India has offered sanctuary to so many persecuted people from all around South Asia, from the Dalai Lama and Tibetans who fled in 1959 when China invaded Tibet to refugees from many other war torn nations from across Asia and Africa. We have now lost the moral high ground in our very subcontinent.
It is ominously clear that the Modi-Shah-led BJP Government is determined on pushing through all means available in its political armoury, its stated agenda of forcing India to become a de facto 'Hindu Rashtra’ even though declaring it in law (de jure) may take some more time.
Part of the strategy to consolidate majority Hindu sentiment is by continuously stoking the fire of communal difference, hatred and intolerance while remaining strategically silent when violence engulfed India through lynchings, mob killings and mass violence in the last few years.
CAA, accompanied by the declaration of forcing the National Register of Citizens (NRC) on the whole country is the lethal project of subordinating Muslims to virtually become second class citizens in their own country.
What the CAA and nationwide NRC will accomplish is much more sinister: It will unleash insecurity amongst Muslims throughout India in a scale hitherto not experienced. 
The NRC Assam process has demonstrated that over 19 lakh citizens got left out from the NRC with more than 12 lakh Hindus and Indigenous people failing to prove their Indian citizenship.  In the whole country these numbers could swell to an unimaginable high figure. Even in Assam the 12 lakh Hindus and Indigenous people cannot be made stateless. 
CAA is aimed at meeting that contingency by giving citizenship to Hindus, Sikh, Buddhists, Jains, Christians, and Parsis i.e. to all except the Muslims. Thus, the CAA serves several of their purposes: it grants citizenship to all "illegal immigrants" except Muslims by excluding and creating a second, subordinated class of citizens. Who will then have restricted rights, apart from being in detention centres.
With the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution, internet lockdown, blackout of all leaders in Kashmir, the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid decision by the SC in favour of the Hindu Community, the nationwide National Register of Citizens (NRC) and now the CAA -- the Hindu Rashtra project of the Sangh seems to be a reality and not a far flung prophecy: it is here to stay.
Our country is passing through one of the most serious crises to its existence as a secular, democratic republic. It is extremely vital that all democratically minded citizens join hands to oppose the CAA.
PUCL will work with other human rights groups, constitutionally minded and concerned citizens to oppose the CAA and NRC, scheduled to be rolled out throughout India.
PUCL gives a call to all concerned citizens to follow Gandhiji’s method of civil disobedience and to resist the nationwide NRC process and the implementation of the CAA through non-violent means and non-cooperation and urge the people of India to save democracy and rule of law in the country.

Comments

TRENDING

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Election bells ringing in Nepal: Can ousted premier Oli return to power?

By Nava Thakuria*  Nepal is preparing for a national election necessitated by the collapse of KP Sharma Oli’s government at the height of a Gen Z rebellion (youth uprising) in September 2025. The polls are scheduled for 5 March. The Himalayan nation last conducted a general election in 2022, with the next polls originally due in 2027.  However, following the dissolution of Nepal’s lower house of Parliament last year by President Ram Chandra Poudel, the electoral process began under the patronage of an interim government installed on 12 September under the leadership of retired Supreme Court judge Sushila Karki. The Hindu-majority nation of over 29 million people will witness more than 3,400 electoral candidates, including 390 women, representing 68 political parties as well as independents, vying for 165 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’