Skip to main content

600 prominent Indian citizens appeal to Indian, Pak govts to "refrain" from further hostilities

By A Representative
As many as 600 citizens of India, “deeply concerned” at the recent escalation of tensions between India and Pakistan leading to “climate of intolerance”, have appeal to the two governments to “refrain from further hostilities, overt or covert, and to resolve their differences within the framework of international law and human rights.”
In a statement, they have said, while “nothing can justify the act of terrorism that took the lives of more than 40 CRPF personnel in Pulwama on February 14, 2019”, nor can “anything justify the Pakistan government’s covert support of armed groups that have carried out this sort of attack in Kashmir”, they insist, “India’s response to this incident must abide by international law in letter and spirit.”
In a statement, they have said, “The history of war across the world has repeatedly shown how easily and speedily an armed conflict can escalate well beyond what was initially expected”, adding, “It would be easy for seemingly “safe” strikes and counter-strikes between India and Pakistan to lead to a major confrontation, possibly even nuclear war, with disastrous consequences for both sides.”
Pointing out that “even a limited confrontation would resolve nothing – neither the tensions between India and Pakistan, nor the Kashmir dispute”, the statement says, “On the contrary, it would aggravate tensions and delay the process of conflict resolution.”
According to the statement, “The principal victims of this conflict are the civilian residents of Kashmir, who have endured immense suffering over the years, including gross human rights violations. In recent days, Kashmiris have also been a target of brutal attacks across the country.” It adds, “If the conflict intensifies, this hostility is likely to be extended to other minorities and dissidents.”
It continues, “Perhaps the biggest national damage is the erosion of democracy including the freedom of expression and dissent. Unfortunately, the climate of jingoism that tends to develop around this sort of situation is obscuring these simple truths. Even reasoned demands for a peaceful solution tend to be conflated with anti-national sentiment.”
---
Click HERE for list of signatories

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

Gujarat police SOP sparks questions over communal profiling

By Shabnam Hashmi*  The Gujarat government must be held accountable for what appears to be a deeply disturbing instance of state-sponsored communal profiling. Ahmedabad resident Sahal Qureshi recently shared with me an official document , which I translated with the help of AI before forwarding it to several media organisations and political leaders. 

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.