Skip to main content

Indians donating Rs 10,000 plus to NGO "sent notices" by Govt of India, seeking to know reason for "support"

Shabnam Hashmi of Anhad
By Our Representative
In a surprise revelation which may create flutter among those supporting civil rights organizations, the Government of India (GoI) reportedly sent notices to Indians who had donated as little as more than Rs 10,000 to the NGO Act Now for Harmony and Democracy (or Anhad), run by well-known human rights activist Shabnam Hashmi.
Anhad is one of the seven NGOs whose Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) license has been cancelled by the Ministry of Home Affairs, GoI, after it was issued in March 2016. “Those who were sent donations were asked whether they knew for what purpose it was meant”, a knowledgeable source told Counterview.
Another prominent NGOs whose FCRA has been cancelled is Navsaran Trust, a Gujarat-based Dalit rights which supported the anti-caste powerful movement which gripped the state and the nation against the gruesome flogging (click HERE) of four Dalit youths in Una, a town in the Saurashtra region, for skinning dead cows.
Cancelling Navsarjan Trust’s FCRA license, the GoI accused it of “undesirable activities aimed to affect prejudicially harmony between religious, racial, social, linguistic, regional groups, castes or communities”, cancelling the license it was issued on August 3, 2016, three weeks after the Una incident.
Issued soon after the FCRA withdrawal, an Anhad statement said, “It’s not the foreign funds that are being questioned”, calling it an effort to “suppress” any dissident in India. Terming it “draconian”, it added, “The present attack is a continuation of similar draconian measures taken during the past three years by the present government in almost every sphere of intellectual activity and freedom of expression.”
Martin Macwan, founder, Navsarjan Trust
Things allegedly became awry for Anhad immediately after Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister. An enquiry was instituted against it from the Home Ministry in June 2014. In November 2015 the Home Ministry did the second enquiry, following which it sent four trunks full of material to it.
“The scenario is like the demonetization notices”, Anhad said, wondering, “Government can’t make up its mind what it wants to do… If it had to cancel the FCRA, it should have done after the November 2015 enquiry. Why did they renew the FCRA then and why have they cancelled it now?”
“It is very clear that a government which thinks it is fine to have 100% FDI in many areas, including defence, but cannot afford the dissenting voices to have any access to funds. Notices were also sent in 2014 to donors who donated more than Rs 10,000 to Anhad from within India”, it added.
Navsarjan Trust founder Martin Macwan told Counterview, “We have come to know about GoI decision of canceling the FCRA license from the media." Dalit rights activists in Gujarat suspect the move has come on account of participation in the Una movement” calling the decision “purely political.”
Meanwhile, several Rajya Sabha members of Parliament (MPs), cutting across party lines, have written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi wondering why the GoI has refused to investigate Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which collects “huge amounts of money abroad and then use it to further a hate filled agenda”.
Calling the selective targeting of NGOs such as Sabrang Trust run by Teesta Setalvad, Anhad, Lawyers Collective, Greenpeace India, Navsarjan Trust, as “abhorrent and anti-democratic” only because they are critical of government policies, the MPs said, their “licenses had been earlier renewed, showing that in the normal course these NGOs had fulfilled the criteria required for registration.”
“The decision to cancel the registration is therefore a decision motivated by the politics of vendetta, victimization and an effort to bully them into silence”, the MPs insisted, demanding revocation of the cancelled licenses.
Those who have signed the statement include Sitaram Yechury and P Karunakaran of the CPI(M), D Raja of the CPI, Ahmed Patel and Renuka Chaudhury of the Congress, Premchand Gupta of the Rashtriya Janata Dal, Praful Patel and Supriya Sule of the Nationalist Congress Party, and Neeraj Shekar of the Samajwadi Party.

Comments

Unknown said…
You can donate 10000 crore in cash to BJP without any question.
What is the duty of R.B.I.?
When notes were named these to bge taken back without any restrictors I feel.
What is the moral responsibility of the head?
If any subordinates have done mistake at the time of exchange?
His moral responsibility is to quit from his post.
He! he is expected to deny or put new rules within in the stipulated period it may be unlawful. Isit not breach of law enforced by the top.
All use to talk about corrupt money or black money is exchange itself seemsa to be corrupt money. Is it fair to talk so? If RBI ITSEF CONTROLLING THE BLACK MONEY AS A BUSINESS WHAT is the need of tax authorities?
DUE to speedy activities of exchange the banks had worked hard for trasactions of exchange; then why do you blame them. There is sufficient tie for enforcement directorate or CBI etc. Why to be mixed everything in one way? Ban, BAN IS OVER WHEN ANNOUNCED EACH DEPARTMENTS ARE EXPECTED TO TAKE ACTIO ACOORDING T LAW otherwise it becomes unlawful Do you Know. There must not be restrictions for any transactions till the dater of expire by any one Institution. Do you agree or Not? The Why? There are several instructions of transactions those RBI/Enforcement directorates. They I identified 400 now covered some corners nearly 8-11.. There may be sufficient reports expected Do you agree! IT IS THE DUTY OF THE RBI CHIEF TO COLLECT EVERY NOTE OF BANNED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY. That activity must not be restricted as per the promise on the note RBI GOVERNER SIGNED AND GIVEN PUBLIC DO DEAL FOR TRASACTIONS> WWhat is wrong to ask such questions NOW?

TRENDING

JP advised RSS to give up Hindu Rashtra, disband itself: Ex-IAS officer tells Modi

Counterview Desk
Major MG Devasahayam IAS (Retd), chairman, People-First, in an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the occasion of Jayprakash Narain’s (JP’s) death anniversary (October 11) has wondered whether he remembers “a patriot called Jayaprakash Narayan”. Recalling what JP thought on issues such as communalism, freedom, democracy, Hindutva etc., Devasahayam says, Modi has been been doing “the very opposite of the principles and values for which JP lived and died.”

India's GDP down by 50%, not 23%, job loss 200 million not 122 million: Top economist

By Our Representative One of India’s topmost economists has estimated that India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) decline was around 50%, and not 23%, as claimed by the Government of India’s top data body, National Statistical Organization (NSO). Prof Arun Kumar, who is Malcolm S Adiseshiah chair professor, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi, said this was delivering a web policy speech, organised by the Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), New Delhi.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

UP chief secretary, DGP have 'surrendered' to political diktat: 92 retired IAS, IPS officials

Counterview Desk
In an open letter to Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath, 92 retired IAS, IFS and IPS bureaucrats, commenting on “blatant violations of the rule law” following the Hathras incident, have blamed that the Chief Secretary and the Director General of Police for abjectly failing to exercise control over a “highly compromised” administration the state.

Hathras reflects Manu's mindset dominates: 'Women are false, it's in their nature to seduce'

By Parijat Ghosh, Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
The woman died and then we woke up to protest. She was alive for two weeks after the heinous incident. Many of us even didn’t notice what had happened at Hathras, how she fought during the next 15 days. Those who noticed, many of them were not sure what actually had happened. So much so, we as a nation were more busy in finding out who among the Bollywood actresses were taking drugs, who smoked weed, who had ‘inappropriate’ or more than one relationship, what kind of private conversations they had in their chat boxes and what not!

Gujarat literati flutter: State Akademi autonomy curb a Sahitya Parishad poll issue?

By Dankesh Oza*
The 115-year-old Gujarati Sahitya Parishad is in election mode. More than 3,000 life members of the Parishad are set to elect its 52nd president and 40 plus central working committee (CWC) members, which in turn will elect its executive and two vice presidents, six secretaries and a treasurer for the coming three years (from 2021 to 2023).

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Atrocities against Dalits: Why don't MPs, MLAs from the community ever speak up?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
In Gujarat, a young Dalit activist lawyer Devji Maheshwari, belonging to the Backward and Minority Communities Employees Federation (BAMSCEF) was killed in Surat, allegedly by a goon who was warning him against his Facebook posts not to speak up against Brahmanism. Facts have come to light suggesting there are other issues also which led to the murder, mostly related to land disputes, many a time ignored by activists.

Delhi riots: Even British didn't accuse Bhagat Singh of reading Lenin, Jack London

By Vikash Narain Rai*
After the #BlackLifeMatters movement seriously tested the credibility of police across America, the Houston police chief Art Acevado talked of ending “lawful but awful” policing. No comparison, but in India, a citizens’ committee comprising former top judges and bureaucrats is now set to inquire into the role of the state machinery and media in handling the February 2020 Delhi violence, which followed protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), “as the investigation by the Delhi Police has evoked extensive critical commentary in recent times.”