Skip to main content

Compulsory voting law in Gujarat: Modi "abstained" from House when law was introduced in Dec 2009

OP Kohli
By Our Representative
Gujarat governor OP Kohli’s recent decision to legitimise the controversial law, passed in the state assembly twice in the past, to make voting to local governing bodies compulsory, has come following five-year-long apprehensions in Gujarat that those who do cast their vote without “valid” reasons would face punitive, perhaps criminal, action. Called Gujarat Local Authorities Law (Amendment) Act, the law was first passed in the Gujarat state assembly on December 19, 2009. Interestingly, when the law was voted in the assembly, Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi was not present in the House. He, instead, opted to "watch" the proceedings sitting in the chief minister’s chamber of the state assembly.
The law is known to have been drafted under the direct advice of Modi following "consultations" with the State Election Commission, responsible for holding local body polls, say insiders. Among those who took special interest in drafting the was was senior IAS bureaucrat Rajnikant M Patel, a Marxist-turned-saffron supporter, who resigned from the government to fight state assembly polls on BJP ticket in December 2012. Justifying the lw, Modi declared said that it would help “curb black money, rampant in electoral expense right now.” He did not explain how. Patel is currently BJP MLA from a constituency in Ahmedabad.
While the punitive actions are to form part of the rules to be drafted by the Gujarat government, and placed in the state assembly for a nod, the officials who drafted the Bill say these should include depriving individuals of advantages from government scheme. “If the citizen has rights, he or she should also have duties towards democracy”, a senior bureaucrat, who was one of the brains behind the compulsory voting law, said. If all goes well and it is not challenged, the law will take effect in the forthcoming elections to six municipal corporations, 31 district panchayats, 231 taluka panchayats and 53 nagarpalikas in Gujarat are due in October 2015.
The law defines the the voter failing to turn up to vote as “defaulter”, and the government will decide on what do with such a person. “Such defaulters may be deprived of below poverty line (BPL) card, government service, or subsidized loan”, the bureaucrat said. The defaulter will be declared as such by the election officer after serving notice to be replied within one month, explaining the reason for failing to vote.
The exempted category include a person who is “physically incapable due to illness”, or is “absent in on the date of election from the country or the state of Gujarat”. If the explanation is not to the satisfaction of the election officer, the defaulter would "face the tune."
Dr Kamla
Former governor Dr Kamla, who refused to sign the law twice, gave three reasons for her decision. First of all, to make voting to all local self-governing bodies compulsory was a violation of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution, which gives Indian citizens freedom of speech and expression. Secondly, the provision which seeks to punish those who do not turn up to vote was considered violation of the fundamental freedom of citizens. And lastly, there were several countries where compulsory voting had failed. These included Italy, Netherlands, Austria and Peru.
Dr Kamla also objected to clubbing the compulsory voting provision with 50 per cent reservation for women in local bodies as part of the same low. Objecting to this, Dr Kamla asked the government to come up with a new law, dropping the provision of compulsory voting, and preserving 50 per cent reservation, up from 33 per cent, for women in local bodies. But the Gujarat government refused to oblige.
In line with Dr Kamla’s views, the Opposition Congress all along demanded that the Gujarat government should come up with a separate bill in the forthcoming state assembly session to provide 50 per cent reservation to women in local bodies. “If the ruling BJP comes up with a separate bill on it, we will support it”, then opposition leader Shaktisinh Gohil had said, adding, “Several countries, which had made voting compulsory have reconsidered the provision, as they could not enforce it.”

Comments

TRENDING

India's GDP down by 50%, not 23%, job loss 200 million not 122 million: Top economist

By Our Representative One of India’s topmost economists has estimated that India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) decline was around 50%, and not 23%, as claimed by the Government of India’s top data body, National Statistical Organization (NSO). Prof Arun Kumar, who is Malcolm S Adiseshiah chair professor, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi, said this was delivering a web policy speech, organised by the Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), New Delhi.

JP advised RSS to give up Hindu Rashtra, disband itself: Ex-IAS officer tells Modi

Counterview Desk
Major MG Devasahayam IAS (Retd), chairman, People-First, in an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the occasion of Jayprakash Narain’s (JP’s) death anniversary (October 11) has wondered whether he remembers “a patriot called Jayaprakash Narayan”. Recalling what JP thought on issues such as communalism, freedom, democracy, Hindutva etc., Devasahayam says, Modi has been been doing “the very opposite of the principles and values for which JP lived and died.”

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

UP chief secretary, DGP have 'surrendered' to political diktat: 92 retired IAS, IPS officials

Counterview Desk
In an open letter to Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath, 92 retired IAS, IFS and IPS bureaucrats, commenting on “blatant violations of the rule law” following the Hathras incident, have blamed that the Chief Secretary and the Director General of Police for abjectly failing to exercise control over a “highly compromised” administration the state.

Hathras reflects Manu's mindset dominates: 'Women are false, it's in their nature to seduce'

By Parijat Ghosh, Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
The woman died and then we woke up to protest. She was alive for two weeks after the heinous incident. Many of us even didn’t notice what had happened at Hathras, how she fought during the next 15 days. Those who noticed, many of them were not sure what actually had happened. So much so, we as a nation were more busy in finding out who among the Bollywood actresses were taking drugs, who smoked weed, who had ‘inappropriate’ or more than one relationship, what kind of private conversations they had in their chat boxes and what not!

Gujarat literati flutter: State Akademi autonomy curb a Sahitya Parishad poll issue?

By Dankesh Oza*
The 115-year-old Gujarati Sahitya Parishad is in election mode. More than 3,000 life members of the Parishad are set to elect its 52nd president and 40 plus central working committee (CWC) members, which in turn will elect its executive and two vice presidents, six secretaries and a treasurer for the coming three years (from 2021 to 2023).

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Delhi riots: Even British didn't accuse Bhagat Singh of reading Lenin, Jack London

By Vikash Narain Rai*
After the #BlackLifeMatters movement seriously tested the credibility of police across America, the Houston police chief Art Acevado talked of ending “lawful but awful” policing. No comparison, but in India, a citizens’ committee comprising former top judges and bureaucrats is now set to inquire into the role of the state machinery and media in handling the February 2020 Delhi violence, which followed protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), “as the investigation by the Delhi Police has evoked extensive critical commentary in recent times.”

Atrocities against Dalits: Why don't MPs, MLAs from the community ever speak up?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
In Gujarat, a young Dalit activist lawyer Devji Maheshwari, belonging to the Backward and Minority Communities Employees Federation (BAMSCEF) was killed in Surat, allegedly by a goon who was warning him against his Facebook posts not to speak up against Brahmanism. Facts have come to light suggesting there are other issues also which led to the murder, mostly related to land disputes, many a time ignored by activists.