Gujarat government move to revive SIR pruned last year: Site for Maruti-Suzuki plant

By Rajiv Shah
Move is underway in top corridors of power of the Gujarat government to “revive” the high-profile Mandal-Bechraji special investment regions (MBSIR), which houses the proposed Maruti-Suzuki plant, which was pruned to nearly one-fifth of its original size -- from nearly 50,000 hectares (ha) to 10,172 ha. The MBSIR in North Gujarat was proposed a major auto hub. It had to be pruned following a long-drawn-out farmers’ protest last year led by Jameen Adhikar Anadolan Gujarat (JAAG). JAAG has emerged as a powerful farmers’ group campaigning against dozen-odd SIRs coming up in Gujarat.
While JAAG has already moved the High Court against the SIR Act, terming it anti-constitutional, sources say, one of the major issues nagging farmers was the government decision to impose the town planning laws on MBSIR. It required farmers to obligatorily hand over 40 to 50 per cent of their land in the name of infrastructure development in the area to the government. Worse, they were obliged to shift to a new area allocated by the government to continue doing farming in future.
Well-informed sources quoted a top bureaucrat involved in Vibrant Gujarat investment business summit, a biennial event begun by chief minister Narendra Modi in 2003, to say that the move to downsize the SIR was “electoral”.
The bureaucrat said, “Considering the strength the anti-MBSIR movement was acquiring, Modi at that time felt that if we had not decided to prune the SIR, it would have snowballed into a major issue not just in Gujarat but India, dubbing him as anti-farmer. All that is past now. Modi is well-entrenched as Prime Minister. Plans are being worked out to revive the MBSIR. You will hear about it soon.”
Sources suspect the government move to “revive” the MBSIR to its original size of 50,000 ha comes because it believes that the elite sections of the region have begun to feel that it was a “mistake” to have agreed to prune the MBSIR.
As against 44 villages, the MBSIR was downsized to just eight villages, consisting of Hansalpur (863 ha, where the Maruti Suzuki plant is proposed), Sitapur (3,672 ha), Ughroj (1,424 ha), Ughrojpura (637 ha), Ukardi (856 ha), Shihor (953 ha), Bhagapara (1,243 ha) and Chandanki (524 ha). The sources say, certain sections feel that while the land prices of the eight villages forming the SIR have skyrocketed, but as for the rest, they have considerably gone down, without any signs of revival.
JAAG leader Sagar Rabari told Counterview that any move to revive the MBSIR would be fought “tooth and nail.” However, he agreed that there were “fringe elements” in the region which want the SIR to be revived.
“There are three category of people who want to revive MBSIR. First are the landowners who have turned into real estate agents. They want to trade in land at a higher price. Secondly, there is the landed gentry which has moved to towns and cities or are living abroad, and are in more in a position to administer the land they possess, hence they want to dispose of their land at as much price they can muster”, Rabair said.
He added, “And finally, there are poor people, mainly Dalits and OBC Thakores, who are forced to migrate to other areas of Gujarat every year, as they do not get enough employment in this region”.
Rabari claimed, “All together, these elements do not form more than 10-12 per cent of the farmers in the region. Majority of farmers are against any effort to revive the MBSIR in its original form, as they know that 40 to 50 per cent of their land would have to go in the name of infrastructure development. In fact, awareness about why SIR harms farmers is growing. The anti-SIR movement is spreading. From MBSIR, the stir has spread to Dholera in Ahmedabad district, Dahej in South Gujarat, and Santalpur in North Gujarat.”
Meanwhile, a writ petition has been filed in the Gujarat High Court against the SIR Act, saying it contradicts the Government of India’s new land acquisition law, which makes social impact assessment and people’s consent a must for any project coming in any part of India. The Gujarat government has been issued notice on this.
Challenging the Act, the petitioners of the Gujarat Kedhut Samaj said, as per the section 17 of the Act, the Gujarat government “can apply the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act under which it has the right to take away 50 per cent of the farmers’ land without any compensation.” They added, “The powers and jurisdiction of the panchayats have been restricted to the village gamtal only.”
At the same time, the petitioners underlined, “The provisions of the SIR Act are contrary to the provisions in the 9th Schedule of the Constitution pertaining to panchayats, and is therefore unconstitutional.”
According to a senior constitutional expert, “The 9th schedule was included in the Indian constitution with the objective to deny the courts the power to challenge the validity of certain laws framed by Parliament to protect citizens from violation of fundamental rights and measures progressive land reforms laws.”

Comments

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra* Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

Search This Blog