Skip to main content

"Setback" to Govt of India on cases of corruption in land allotment to Narmada dam oustees: NBA

By Our Representative
In a significant development, a two judge bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice TS Thakur and Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel, has refused to entertain a Petition filed by the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) to transfer a seven year old public interest litigation (PIL) from the High Court of Madhya Pradesh to the Supreme Court. Chaired by the secretary, Union water resources ministry, NCA is the decision-making inter-state body with powers to take a final call on all major contentious issues related with the Narmada project, including raising of the dam.
The NCA had requested the Supreme Court to transfer the writ petition No 14765/2007, which was filed by the powerful anti-dam organisation Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), challenging massive corruption in the resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) of the Sardar Sarovar project affected families in Madhya Pradesh. Involving thousands of Narmada dam oustees, the NBA has alleged, on the basis of official reports, that huge funds were siphoned away by corrupt officials while offering cash in lieu of land to the oustees.
The NBA believes, offering cash instead of land is “illegal” and runs counter to the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) award on distribution of Narmada water to the four states – Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Rajasthan.
The NCA had simultaneously sought transfer of an interim application by NBA, currently with the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The application has challenged the decision of the NCA, backed by the Narendra Modi government, dated June 12, 2014, allowing the Gujarat government to raise in Narmada dam’s height from 121.92 metres to the full reservoir level, 138.64 metres. 
The application had wanted the dam height should not be allowed to be raised till the Judicial Commission appointed by the High Court under Justice SS Jha (retired), which has been inquiring the corruption scandal for the last six years, submits its report to the High Court, and the High Curt issues directions on it.
“Refusing to transfer the NCA’s plea on corruption from the High Court to the Apex Court, the Division Bench said that the Madhya Pradesh High Court would continue to hear the corruption matter, but not the issue to raise of the height of Narmada dam”, an NBA statement said, adding, “With regard to the latter issue of raise in the height in the Narmada dam, the bench granted liberty to the NBA to approach the Supreme Court for suitable directions.”
The statement added, “The NBA will continue to raise the issue of corruption in the rehabilitation before the High Court and challenge the illegal move to raise the height of the dam, along with other issues of rehabilitation, before the Supreme Court as also other forums. There are to this day 2.5 lakh oustees yet to be rehabilitated and thousands of un-rehabilitated families under the present dam height of 121.92 metres itself, who have become a victim of corruption and State neglect.”
NBA leader Medha Patkar, petition in person, and Advocate Sanjay Parikh appeared for the respondents NBA. Mukul Rohtgi, Attorney General of India, and Syed Naqvi, advocate, appeared for the Union of India and the NCA.

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.

Not just Indian women engineers, men too face sexual harassment at workplace: US study

By Rajiv Shah
A recent research, carried out jointly by two US-based non-profit organizations, Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and Center for WorkLife Law (WLL), based at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has found that 45% of women engineers as against 28% of men engineers complained that it was perceived as “inappropriate when women argued at work, even when it was work-related.”