Skip to main content

Gujarat police case against Teesta Setelvad is an effort to "discredit" human rights defenders: PUCL

By Our Representative
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has said that the case filed by Gujarat police against human rights activist Teesta Setelvad and her colleagues of the Citizens for Peace and Justice (CPJ) is nothing but an effort to “discredit human rights defenders in the public eye thereby making their task as human rights defenders more onerous and difficult to discharge.” In fact, it is an effort to “undermine” the UN Declaration of protecting human rights defenders adopted by UN general assembly in 2013, which acknowledges “legitimate role of human rights defenders and the promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law.”
Releasing full text of the complaint lodged before the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking justice to Setalvad, the PUCL -- which is one of India's topmost human rights bodies -- said, it is saying this because it is “concerned” about the prosecution and persecution of Setalvad and others of the CPJ, “who had taken up the issues of the victims of Gujarat riots which took place in the year 2002.” It added, “It was their intervention before the Supreme Court and other courts which ultimately led to over 110 convictions so far with other trials nearing completion.”
The PUCL insisted, “The efforts made by (Setelvad and others) are required to be appreciated as they acted for defending and protecting the gross human rights violations of the victims of 2002 riots. It is the duty of the State of Gujarat and all its administrative organs to protect Setalvad and others of CJP in defending the legal constitutional and human rights of the victims of Gujarat riots and to provide them protection, as envisaged in the UN human rights documents, which is also endorsed by the NHRC.”
Referring to the misappropriation case filed against Setalvad and others by the Gujarat police with the active supporter of one of the former employees of the CJP, in which she had “misused” NGO funds for personal gains, the PUCL statement – signed by Dr V Suresh, national general secretary, recalled there have been constant efforts to defame her and her colleagues in the past, too.
In 2004 Zahira Sheikh -- eye witness in the Best Bakery case in which 14 persons were charred to death in 2002 riots -- alleged that she had been “kidnapped” by Setalvad and forced to testify in court against the accused. “The Registrar-General of the Supreme Court after an elaborate enquiry found the allegations against Setalvad by Sheikh to be baseless. While the exoneration helped the CJP to concentrate on its human rights work, valuable time, resources and energy were wasted in the effort”, the PUCL recalled.
“Another example of the misuse of the investigative powers of the Gujarat Police can be found in the private complaint case filed by one Raees Khan. This simple defamation case was used to conduct a roving inquiry by the DCB Crime Branch, Ahmedabad. This roving Inquiry has been challenged in a petition before the High Court of Gujarat”, the PUCL said, adding, “It was in the context of convictions of people owing allegiance to the ruling dispensation, including conviction of policemen and politicians that allegations and complaints against CJP and Setalvad were vigorously pursued by Gujarat Police.”
The PUCL underlined, “Without going into the merits of the complaints we would like to point out that the complaints against CJP and Setalvad have to be examined closely and cautiously in the light of the more than decade long struggle that she and her organisation had waged against the Gujarat State agencies, especially the police and law enforcement agencies.”
The PUCL pointed out, “The CJP and its office bearers Setalvad, Javed Anand and their team of human rights defenders have under threats of grave risk to their personal safety, ensured that the rule of law prevailed in the state of Gujarat at a time when the entire state machinery was subverted and all public officials either abdicated their constitutional and statutory functions or worse connived/ actively participated with the perpetrators of terror and violence.”
It added, “Even as they strived to establish the rule of law and ensured that perpetrators were punished, a slew of complaints and FIRs were foisted against them. Many complaints were later found to be unfounded. While we do not want to comment on the specifics of any of the pending complaints we are of the firm belief that the complaints against CJP, Teesta and Javed Anand have to be appreciated in the larger continuum of facts and events.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
Riiiiight.

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

A locked up offer? Govt of India 'not serious' in involving NGOs: IIM-A survey

By Rajiv Shah
Was the Government of India serious when it asked 92,000 civil society organizations (CSOs) in early April to “assist” state governments and district administrations in taking care of food, shelter and other needs of migrant workers, known to have been affected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’ sudden 21-day lockdown in order to “combat” the spread of Covid-19 virus, announced on March 24?

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Dalits in India, Blacks in US suffer 'similar' humiliation: Macwan drafts letter to Trump

Counterview Desk
Well-known human rights activist Martin Macwan, recipient of the prestigious Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Award in 2000, has drafted an open letter to US President Donald Trump following the disturbing turn of events with the murder of George Floyd, leading to widespread protests in the US. He has sought signatures of concerned citizens before sending it to Trump.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”

Sitharaman's offer for rural jobs to 'create' just 3 crore rural jobs. Demand: 12 crore jobs

By Amarjeet Kaur*
The final package, the fifth one in a row, announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on May 17 was a fiasco. Sitharaman during her press conference for two hours and six minutes spent more than an hour detailing the policy actions of her government’s last six years’ rule, repeating the already provided proposals during the two budgets after coming to power for the second time, even as reiterating her briefings on the four earlier packages she had announced over the previous four days.