Skip to main content

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil
By Our Representative
Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.
Well-known historian and activist Achyut Yagnik, author of two major books on history of Gujarat and Ahmedabad, published by Penguins, has said that the caste to which Modi belongs – modh ghanchi – is “very much part of the other backward class, and there is little or no need to cite government resolutions about it.” Arguing against Gohil, who said that “modhs are rich people living in a particular village”, Yagnik said, “This is totally wrong. If a particular caste or a jati has a different name it doesn’t lose its social backwardness.”
Professor of sociology at the Gujarat University, Gaurang Jani, taking a similar view, criticized Gohil for making an issue out of non-issue. Expert adviser to the state’s OBC commission, responsible for recommending castes which should be included in the OBC list, Jani said, “Ganchis were always considered a backward community in Gujarat, and there is nothing new about it. They were, of course, not as exploited as the Dalits or scheduled castes were, but their status in social hierarchy is well known.
Achyut Yagnik
Jani underlined, “It seems that Gohil, who belongs to Saurashtra, does not properly understand the caste dynamics and traditions of North Gujarat. Even if modh ghanchis were included in the OBC category in January 2002, as Gohil claims, the fact is, it often takes up to a decade for a particular caste to be included in the list of OBCs after it applies for it, such is the bureaucratic procedure.”
Pointing out that the sub-castes which consider Modheshwari as goddess are referred to as “modh” in Gujarat, Yagnik stressed, “The ganchis of North Gujarat, who used to eke a living by churning oil from edible oil, are known as telis in Uttar Pradesh, who are also OBC. Historically, whether it is ghanchis in North Gujarat, or telis in Uttar Pradesh, they have belonged to the backward class. No conservative upper caste person – a Brahmin or a Bania – would ever enter into a matrimonial relationship with a ghanchi.” He added, “It is immaterial if they were not included in the OBC list – that’s just a legal issue.”
A known critic of Modi’s politics and ideology, Yagnik said, “What’s a fact is a fact. How can you seek to disprove a reality? Mahatma Gandhi was a modh vania or bania, Dhirubhai Ambani was a modh vania, and there are Brahmin modhs, too, because their clans considered Modheshwari as their goddess. Same is true of Hindu ghanchis. But they are known to be socially and educationally backward.” Yagnik was once part the campaign committee for reservation following the Mandal commission recommendation in 1980 that socially and economically backward sections too should be provided reservation.
Gaurang Jani
Meanwhile, bureaucrat-turned-politician RM Patel, who is BJP MLA from the reserved scheduled caste seat of Asarwa, told Counterview that the decision to include the Hindu ghanchis in the OBC list was taken in 2002 when he was Gujarat’s social justice and empowerment secretary. “Till then, the Hindu ghanchis were recognized in the Government of India list alone as OBC. In Gujarat, only Muslim ghanchis were included in the OBC category. The file came to me to include the Hindu ghanchis, too, and I decided to add them in the OBC list”, the former bureaucrat who resigned from the IAS to fight on BJP ticket in 2012 added. 
Gohil had alleged in his statement on May 8, “Of late Gujarat chief minister has been indulging in a low level of political gimmickry. He has been desperately trying to invoke his OBC status and garner sympathy. Modi does not belong to OBC as he has been claiming to exploit OBC votes. He belongs to rich and prosperous modh ghanchis who were never given any kind of reservation nor were included in OBCs before Modi became chief minister.”
Saying that Modi included his caste into the OBC list in January 2002, the Congress leader said, Modi indulged in “subtle manipulation… The Ghanchis who were muslims were among OBCs, but not prosperous Modh Ghanchis to which Modi belongs. Modi Government issued a circular onJanuary 1, 2002 that modh ghanchis are also included in OBC. It must be noted that Modi became CM in October 2001.”
Gohil quoted from the authentic Gujarati lexicon Bhagvadgomandal which says that modh are rich people living in a particular village. Gandhiji was a modh vanik, he said. “Modh is an adjective showing prosperity status of a particular caste or community”, he said, adding, “By acquiring OBC status for his selfish motives, Modi has in fact encroached upon the right of members of OBC.”

Comments

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.

How retraints were imposed on academic freedom on the IIM-Ahmedabad campus

By Sandeep Pandey*  This is the seventh consecutive academic year when I would have gone as a visiting faculty member to the Indian Institute of Management at Ahmedabad to teach an Elective course on Transformational Social Movements to the second year of Post Graduate Programme students. But the invitation has not come so far and it looks like it is the end of my teaching stint at IIM, at least, so long as the Bhartiya Janata Party remains in power at the centre.

Supreme Court Bar Association letter to CJI 'meant to defame' protesting farmers

By Prem Singh*  Have we ceased to be a wakeful and sensitive civil society and instead have become the horns of parties, leaders and governments? Whatever profession we are in, have we lost all respect for our responsibility and dignity?  It is understandable that a pro-corporate government should launch a campaign to defame the farmers from the very first day of its agitation against the government's apathy to their long-pending demands. Because it considers the people of the country, especially the hardworking farmers, labourers, artisans, unemployed and underemployed, not as citizens but as subjects who live at the mercy of the government.  But the professional noblemen of the civil society should defame the farmers in an organizational manner -- this explains our fall as a civil society.  It is a matter of utmost regret that the president of the Supreme Court Bar Association has written a letter to the Chief Justice demanding that he take suo motu cognizance of the “erring” far