Skip to main content

Despite NHRC plea, Gujarat govt says there is no need to pay compensation to victims of deadly silicosis

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government has said it has “decided” not to pay Rs 5 lakh each as compensation against five confirmed cases of silicosis death, despite a National Human Right Commission (NHRC) direction to the state officialdom to do so. The workers died five years ago. This has been revealed in reply to a query under the right to information (RTI) to the Peoples Training and Research Center (PTRC), made to chief secretary, Government of Gujarat, Varesh Sinha, on April 7, 2014. The PTRC wished to know whether the state government had made up its mind to pay the amount due to the poor tribal families.
The chief secretary, refusing to directly answer the question, decided to hand over the decision to reply to the state labour and employment department. “In its reply dated April 29, 2014,the state labour and employment department made it clear that the government has decided not to enforce the NHRC recommendation, saying it is not in position to do so”, the PTRC has said, adding, “No reasons have been given. Further, in the reply, the state government has intimated its decision to the NHRC.”
The PTRC filed a complaint before NHRC in 2011 regarding the death of five workers from Dahod district in Gujarat, who had migrated to work in quartz crushing units in Godhra. At Godhra, PTRC said, these workers “were exposed to fine silica dust leading to silicosis, a fatal occupational lung disease.”
“Several workers have succumbed in their youth to the disease”, PTRC said in its statement, adding, “Though the units involved in crushing and polishing of the stone are covered under the employees’ state insurance (ESI) Act, none of them have so far been extended benefits. Survivors of the victims have never received any compensation or relief. As a result, public interest litigation (PIL) was filed in the Supreme Court of India by People's Rights and Social Research Centre (PRASAR) in 2006”.
"In this petition, the Supreme Court passed an interim in May 2009, directing the NHRC to go ahead with confirmed cases of silicosis deaths and order their relief. Following the order, and inspired by it, the PTRC made a plea before the NHRC to ensure payment to the five confirmed cases of death. The NHRC, after a lapse of two years, recommended on October 22, 2013 to the state government to pay Rs 5 lakh to the kin of those who had died. The NHRC sent official communication to the Government of Gujarat in this regard on March 3, 2014 giving six weeks time to enforce the recommendation”, the PTRC said.
Significantly, this was not the only plea to pay compensation. Earlier, in another complaint filed by one Juwan Singh, the NHRC directed the Government of Gujarat to pay Rs 3 lakh to each of the 238 families from Madhya Pradesh against the death of as many persons who in the state. “The Government of Gujarat argued that the workers from Madhya Pradesh may have worked in another state and got exposed to silica dust, hence it should not be held responsible for these deaths. That recommendation too has not been enforced”, PTRC’s Jagdish Patel said.
Patel wonders, “Is it this the much talked about Gujarat model? On one hand it has failed, in the name of good governance, to comply by provisions of the Factories Act by refusing to monitor silica dust and keep a tab on workers’ health. It has not ensured that the owners issue I-cards to the workers, are enrolled under the ESI Act, or are paid minimum wages. On the other, it is refusing to pay the relief amount, as recommended by NHRC.”

Comments

TRENDING

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

ASI has 'no funds' to protect five centuries old Goa church, a World Heritage Site

Counterview Desk
The century-old All-India Catholic Union (AICU), the largest Laity movement in Asia, has blamed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for neglecting the historic Bom Jesu church by keeping its ceilings  open to the vagaries weather, with no steps  taken to protect the five century old monument from damage on account of impending rains on the lame excuse that there are "no funds". In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, AICU simultaneously asks the Government of India to devise a "comprehensive" national social security safety net, universal health Insurance and medical Infrastructure so that the “calamity” that has befalenl millions of migrant labour and jobless rural and urban poor in “the Covid pandemic-driven lockdown is “never repeated.”

Withdraw sedition charges against three young women activists: 1100 feminists

Counterview Desk
About 1,100 feminists from all over India – organisations and individuals across religion, class, caste, ethnicity, ability, sexuality and genders – have issued a solidarity statement condemning what they have called “the targeted crackdown on Muslims and women activists in Delhi”, who were at the forefront of protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC) and National Population Register (NPR).

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Tablighis or Namaste Trump? Rupani must 'clarify' on origin of Covid-19 in Gujarat

By Mujahid Nafees* In his video communication on April 24, 2020, chief minister Vijay Rupani informed us that in the month of March the Gujarat government had quarantined 6,000 people returning from abroad in order to prevent the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. He further asserted that the spread of Covid-19 was caused by the tablighis returning from Nizamuddin in Delhi. His statements were widely publicized and given front page coverage by some local dailies.

Coping with Covid-19? Options before small, marginal farmers of rainfed regions

By Biswanath Sinha, Kuntal Mukherjee*
The global crisis due to Covid-19 has hit after reaching in western Europe. India’s response to curtail the spread of the disease was quite decisive. It announced a Janata curfew on the March 22, followed by a complete national lockdown from the midnight of March 24.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”