Skip to main content

Provide documentary evidence or vacate Rann of Kutch: Gujarat government notice to salt-pan workers

By A Representative
After a lapse of three years, the Gujarat government has once again revived its plan to begin eviction of the salt-pan workers, or agariyas of the Little Rann of Kutch. Earlier, the notice was served on them in April 2011 (read HERE). The latest notice served on the agariyas reads, "You have been asked to submit documentary proof regarding salt making activity in the Little Rann of Kutch.” Quoting the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, amended in 2002, the notice, given to thousands of agariyas, says that any activity in the sanctuary area of the Little Rann of Kutch “is termed prohibited and is liable to punishment from three to seven years of imprisonment, plus Rs 25,000 penalty.”
Giving the agariyas just about a week to provide the proof that they have been leased land in the Little Rann of Kutch to carry out salt producing activity, the notice says, “You are hereby given notice that if you have any documentary evidence submit it within seven days, or else you have to vacate the Rann of Kutch along with all your equipment of salt making.” The notice has been issued by the range forest officer, Wild Ass Sanctuary, Little Rann of Kutch.
The Agariya Hit Rakshak Manch (AHRM), which represents the salt-pan workers, in a statement has said, “On behalf of 12,000 to 15,000 agariya families, AHRM had made a representation to Gujarat’s tribal commissioner to initiate the process of recognizing agariyas’ customary community user rights over the Little Rann of Kutch as per the Forest Rights Act. The representation is still pending.” According to ARHM, the agariyas should be recognized as tribals, in the same way as the tribals of the eastern tribal belt of Gujarat.
It has added, “The fact to be noted is that, the Little Rann of Kutch is near 5,000 sq km of un-surveyed piece of land, and was recently given survey number zero. The Gujarat government too does not have any land records for the same. It is surprising that the state government is asking the agariyas to submit documentary evidence, while salt farming is being conducted in this area for the last 600 years.”
In 2011, a similar notice, served on the agariyas, said that they must evacuate from the Little Rann of Kutch, because they are "endangering the wild ass" in the sanctuary. Belonging to the Gujarat government's forest and revenue departments, officials reportedly went around, to take thumbs impression, from illiterate salt-plan workers on a paper which said they would be benefited under a certain so-called social welfare schemes. In actuality, these papers were an agreement of the salt-pan workers to be evicted of the Little Rann of Kutch.
Mainly belonging to the nomadic tribes, the agariyas have been involved in salt farming for the last several centuries, since the days of the Moghuls. The confusion has arisen, according to ARHM social workers, mainly because there is so far little effort to give a legal sanctity to the land on which the agariyas have been working on.
The agariyas, these social workers say, themselves do not have any document that they own the land on which they have been traditionally farming salt. Nor has there been any effort by the state revenue department so far to give a survey number to these pieces of land. As a result, there is “considerable confusion” about the ownership of the land and the agariyas are in the danger of losing their traditional means of livelihood.
In fact, the social workers suggest, there is little evidence that the salt-pan workers in any way try to interfere or are a danger to the wild ass, which moves around in the sanctuary, declared in 1973. If in 1973 there were just 720 wild asses in the sanctuary area, today their population has reached a whopping 5,000. At least one-fifth of the wild asses no more live in the sanctuary area but outside because of increase in their population. They live on the standing crop in these areas, often destroying it.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.