Skip to main content

"Failure" to fix concept of transportation main reason for delay in implementing Ahmedabad metro

By Our Representative
Indecision about the very concept of when, how and why the metro project in Ahmedabad should be implemented has been the main reason for delay in its implementation, said a top state official associated with the project. Well-placed sources in the Gujarat government have told Counterview that, if till August 2013, the concept of metro was transport-led development, "it has changed now.”
“The new concept is to develop metro in those areas where it can get traffic, as against the thinking earlier that metro would be developed in those areas where Ahmedabad should actually develop, towards Gandhinagar”, a senior official said, adding, “A presentation was made to the Gujarat chief minister suggesting how metro should lead to Ahmedabad expanding towards Gandhinagar from two directions – Gift City, on one hand, and along the SG Highway, on the other.”
In fact, the CM had also approved the idea of taking the metro towards south of Ahmedabad, too -- towards Dholera, where a modern city in the form of special investment region (SIR) is proposed to developed as part of the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor. It was to be extended up to the proposed Greenfield international airport, just outside the SIR. The view was, once metro route was finalised towards Dholera, urbanisation would automatically develop in that direction.
During the presentation, which provided a scenario of development of Ahmedabad till 2050, it was suggested that the concept of transport-led development alone had led to the planned expansion of Navi Mumbai, and it was an "international practice" to do it that way. “It was suggested to the CM that a transport policy which helped horizontal growth of urban areas should be adopted. Modi was agreeable to the concept, and gave a go ahead to it.”
However, in a “remarkable piece of indecision”, officials of the state urban development department “dropped the idea transport-level development, and replaced it with the traditional concept of developing transport only where there is heavy concentration of population.” The result is, “the route has been changed. It is no more metro between Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar. In fact, Gandhinagar is out of the metro. It will be tube railway that will run underground in the entire length and breadth of the city.”
The official said, “With the new change in concept, the work already done – finalization of the route up to Gandhinagar, based on which financial closure for the metro project’s first phase was finalized – would have to redone. The new route would require fresh techno-economic study and soil testing, and the government would again have to go to more than half-a-dozen banks which had allowed financial closure. If till now Rs 300 crore has been spent for all this, an equal amount would have to spent afresh, coupled with delay.”
Meanwhile, latest estimates suggest that the cost of the metro rail project would be much higher than the estimate of Rs 22,800 crore, as envisaged in the detailed project report. This is because, the sources said, after toying with the idea of running most of the metro overground, the Gujarat government has found that it is not feasible, and about 60 per cent of the metro should run underground and there would no link with Gandhinagar in the immediate future. Earlier, only a small corridor of about 16 km was to be part of the 80 kilometres route of the metro.
The change in the route, significantly, would add to the nine-year delay in the metro project. Initially, the delay took place because the state government decided in favour of the BRTS project instead of the metro in 2004-05. In fact, the state government dropped metro like a hot potato, and realized that the delay has cost the state dearly, as several other states have already got their metro projects cleared from the Government of India, and have even got money for themselves.
According to officials, "A minister's committee recently rejected the earlier plan suggested by the Metro Link Express for Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad (MEGA) Company Limited. The construction, which was earlier to link Ahmedabad with Gandhinagar, the state Capital, may now start in the old city area first." Significantly, only six months back, the officials were saying that the old city would have very little of metro, as it did not fit into the concept of transport-led growth!
"Change in the concept has led to change in emphasis, too.The underground rail network will be first taken up, spanning into two old city directions: APMC (Vasna)-Paldi-Jamalpur-Kalpur to Civil Hospital, and Memco (Naroda) to AEC (Sabarmati). These routes have accorded the highest priority now. Considering the dense population of these localities, digging the underground tunnel will be challenging task. Almost 60 per cent of the rail length will be underground now,'' officials said.

Comments

Although, I have heard a lot about company incorporation, but I would like to read more on limited company formation procedure personally to get a better insight about it.

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.

Not just Indian women engineers, men too face sexual harassment at workplace: US study

By Rajiv Shah
A recent research, carried out jointly by two US-based non-profit organizations, Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and Center for WorkLife Law (WLL), based at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has found that 45% of women engineers as against 28% of men engineers complained that it was perceived as “inappropriate when women argued at work, even when it was work-related.”