Skip to main content

Setback to raise Narmada dam? MP High Court asks govt to stop cash payment to oustees in lieu of land

By Our Representative
In an order which can adversely affect further construction of the Narmada dam, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has given its accent to the right to land-based rehabilitation of thousands of Sardar Sarovar Project affected families (PAFs), directing the Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) and the Narmada Valley Development Authority (NVDA) to stop all cash payments in lieu of land entitlements. Recently, a high-level inter-state meeting in New Delhi cleared the proposal to raise the dam height to full reservoir level, 138.64 metres from the present 121.92 metres.
The matter is now at final stages of clearance of the Narmada Control Authority (NCA). The NCA's final decision depends on compliance reports to resettlement and rehabilitation of Narmada dam oustees in three states -- Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra -- which it is supposed to examine to allow the dam construction to be taken forward. With the new order, the fear is, anti-dam activists may argue out that Madhya Pradesh rehabilitation has still not taken place in totality.
The MP High Court said, no cash payments would be acceptable till the SS Jha Judicial Commission, appointed by the High Court in 2008, scrutinized every single case in the framework of the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award (NWDTA), as per the order of the Supreme Court. The order was passed by the bench of acting chief justice KK Lahoti and Justice Subhash Kakade in a petition filed by the anti-dam Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) and some oustees, challenging a new Scheme of GoMP/ NVDA of September 2010 that permits deposit of cash in lieu of land entitlements to 1,500 families.
The scheme, which NBA said was in "complete violation of the terms and conditions stipulated in the NWDTA, R&R Policy, Action Plan and various judgements of the Supreme Court, none of which permit encashment of rehabilitation entitlements", forced oustees to accept land from the Land Bank, which is mostly proved to be uncultivable or under encroachment. The scheme stipulates that in case the oustees refuse land, the second instalment (barely Rs 2.5 lakh) would be deposited in their bank accounts and their rehabilitation would be presumed to be complete.
"It may be noted that these 1,500 families were paid one half of the Special Rehabilitation Package (SRP) almost 5-8 years ago, but none could purchase five acres of land with that amount, the condition necessary for disbursal of the 2nd instalment, and hence were stranded. Ever since then, they have been demanding land allotment", a statement by National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM) on the court order said.
The High Court noted that the award directed the government to only allocate "alternative land to the eligible oustees and not cash." It ordered the GoMP / NVDA "not to deposit any money in the bank under the new/ impugned scheme and no payment of cash in lieu of land can be made unless Justice Jha Commission scrutinizes each case in the context of the NWDTA and other legal bases and grants approval as per the interim order dated 11-05-2009 of the Supreme Court."
:The Supreme Court had ruled on May 11, 2009 that if at all there is any disbursement related to rehabilitation by cash or cheque, the same would be subject to scrutiny by the commission. "In violation of this order, the NVDA deposited cash (second installment of SRP), under the new scheme in the bank accounts of almost 400 PAFs, out of 1,500, by getting them to sign on preformatted affidavits, relinquishing the right to land once and for all and claiming that they would follow some other vocation, leaving agriculture", NAPM statement said.
Challenging these affidavits that are under the scanner of the Jha Commission, the NBA's counsel argued that Justice SP Khare, chairman, Grievance Redressal Authority had also directed that the GoMP / NVDA shall not accept any affidavit from oustees that compromises with the rights granted by the NWDTA. It was also pointed out that the new scheme has reactivated the nexus of middlemen and officials, who have "looted hundreds of PAFs in the fake registries scam. 
"These middlemen have been compelling the oustees, including adivasis, dalits and marginal farmers, to accept cash by giving thumb impressions or signatures on the pre-formatted affidavits and give up their entitlement for land", the statement further said, adding, "The court, after detailed hearing, observed that Justice Jha Commission is on the right path in scrutinizing all the cases of the PAFs where NVDA recommends cash disbursement in one form or the other and there should be no interference at this stage."

Comments

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

ASI has 'no funds' to protect five centuries old Goa church, a World Heritage Site

Counterview Desk
The century-old All-India Catholic Union (AICU), the largest Laity movement in Asia, has blamed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for neglecting the historic Bom Jesu church by keeping its ceilings  open to the vagaries weather, with no steps  taken to protect the five century old monument from damage on account of impending rains on the lame excuse that there are "no funds". In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, AICU simultaneously asks the Government of India to devise a "comprehensive" national social security safety net, universal health Insurance and medical Infrastructure so that the “calamity” that has befalenl millions of migrant labour and jobless rural and urban poor in “the Covid pandemic-driven lockdown is “never repeated.”

Withdraw sedition charges against three young women activists: 1100 feminists

Counterview Desk
About 1,100 feminists from all over India – organisations and individuals across religion, class, caste, ethnicity, ability, sexuality and genders – have issued a solidarity statement condemning what they have called “the targeted crackdown on Muslims and women activists in Delhi”, who were at the forefront of protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC) and National Population Register (NPR).

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Tablighis or Namaste Trump? Rupani must 'clarify' on origin of Covid-19 in Gujarat

By Mujahid Nafees* In his video communication on April 24, 2020, chief minister Vijay Rupani informed us that in the month of March the Gujarat government had quarantined 6,000 people returning from abroad in order to prevent the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. He further asserted that the spread of Covid-19 was caused by the tablighis returning from Nizamuddin in Delhi. His statements were widely publicized and given front page coverage by some local dailies.

Coping with Covid-19? Options before small, marginal farmers of rainfed regions

By Biswanath Sinha, Kuntal Mukherjee*
The global crisis due to Covid-19 has hit after reaching in western Europe. India’s response to curtail the spread of the disease was quite decisive. It announced a Janata curfew on the March 22, followed by a complete national lockdown from the midnight of March 24.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”