Skip to main content

More than 1200 displaced storm NCA head office: 'Move to raise Narmada dam illegal'

By A Representative
On July 2, about 1,200 women and men from the Narmada valley stormed and occupied the head office of the Narmada Control Authority (NCA), Narmada Bhavan at Vijay Nagar, Indore, which is responsible for taking final decisions on the Narmada project. They were protesting against the Government of India's interim decision to raise the height of the Narmada dam from 122 metres (present) to 138.68 metres (final height), taken on June 27 in New Delhi. Result was, claimed a communique from National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), "the final meeting of the NCA with the participating states, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, to finalize raising of the dam height was postponed".
"The decision to raise the dam by the resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) sub-group of the NCA, chaired by secretary, Union Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, was taken despite the fact that it was earlier very critical of the proposal. It knew, not less than 40,000 families in the submergence are being affected even at the present dam height, as they they have not been rehabilitated with entitlements of land to farmers, alternative livelihood to landless, housing plots and amenities at the resettlement sites", the NAPM communique said, adding, "Since 1994 adivasi villages, and since 2000 densely populated villages, are being affected, and the largest number of them are Madhya Pradesh (193)."
The communique further said, "The decision was taken on the basis of false claims and reports by Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Gujarat. It was taken as the basis for pushing the dam under political pressures from the Narendra Modi Government. Large sections of people were upset that the decision, which was to be finalized in the full NCA meeting. If the decision to raise the dam was encorsed, it would have been in utter violation of the Narmada Tribunal Award (1979), environmental norms, several judgments of the Supreme Court, and state level rehabilitation policies."
"Previously", the communique said, "the height of the dam was raised from 110 metres to 122 metres in a similar manner in 2006 which led to 21 days fast by Medha Patkar, Bhagwati Behan and Jamsing Bhai at Jantar Mantar, Delhi. Thereafter, permission was not granted, as every time it was clear that thousands of families remained to be rehabilitated. In Madhya Pradesh, a judicial commission of inquiry was appointed by the State High Court, when massive corruption was unearthed by farmers themselves. The state government itself had to admit that 686 land purchase registries were fake, while the actual figure could be 3,000 or even more. Inquiry by the Commission is on for the last five years."
Then, the Maharashtra government was always taking a stand that rehabilitation of hundreds of adivasis in the state must be completed prior to dam construction and submergence. "Yet"", said its new communique, secretary,rRehabilitation, seems to have misreported the position in the state. It is in this context that the people stormed the NCA office, raising every issue in rehabilitation, environment, cumulative impacts of all dams vis-à-vis regulation in the valley and the costs-benefits of SSP."
Following demands were put forward at the end of the agitation::
* R&R sub-group must withdraw its illegal decision, if already taken, and NCA should not finalize the same, admitting that more than 40,000 families are residing in the submergence area and most of those, affected at the present height are also not rehabilitated.
* NCA must not submit to pressures from states, but play a major and independent role in strictly monitoring and ensuring compliance with law, policies and judgements on rehabilitation and environment, through frequent field visits and investigation.
* Land should be identified for eligible farmers, including adivasis, to rehabilitated them, as per the Narmada tribunal award and Supreme Court Judgements and cash disbursement, as special package, must be stopped, for ever. Maharashtra should not offer cash package to the hilly adivasis in lieu of land.
* Right to fisheries should be granted to the fish workers, alternative livelihood to other landless, as per the NVDA’s Action Plan, 1993, recognized by the Apex Court.
* All major sons should be rehabilitated, with land, as per the Tribunal Award and Judgement of the Supreme Court, 2005.
* No further construction of the dam, including pillars and bridges, should be permitted at this stage, as it would increase submergence by 1.5 metres, as it would be committing contempt of court and people, both.
* NCA must ensure that all those who have faced losses (crop), labourers (houses), fish workers (fish, nets and boats) and shopkeepers (shops and material), potters etc. are compensated.
The mass action ended at 7:00 pm with agitators warning that if their houses and farms get submerged due to the Sardar Sarovar Project or water was released from upstream dams, as happened last August, they would be compelled to take shelter in the NCA office at the Narmada Bhavan.
"They also insisted that NCA must monitor compliance, fully and fairly, without relying on false statistics coming from the state; or else the people would be compelled to lock up the premises. When the Uttarakhand calamity has already taught a lesson, we cannot allow the Narmada valley to face the same, people from the most beautiful and ancient valley warned the officials", the communique said.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.