Skip to main content

SC flags govt inaction as Central, State Information Commissions remain paralyzed

By A Representative 
On September 26, the Supreme Court heard a case concerning the non-appointment of information commissioners at the Central Information Commission (CIC) and several State Information Commissions. The matter was mentioned before a bench comprising Justice Suryakant and Justice Bagchi.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioners, highlighted that the CIC currently has no Chief Information Commissioner and only two of the ten sanctioned posts of information commissioners are filled. He noted that in a previous hearing on January 7, 2025, the Supreme Court had directed the Union of India to file an affidavit outlining a timeline for filling the eight vacant posts, which had been advertised in August 2024. The government had indicated that appointments would be completed within three months, by April 2025. However, no appointments have been made so far.
The petitioners also pointed out the backlog at the CIC, which has more than 26,800 pending appeals and complaints, with cases taking over a year to be heard.
At the state level, the Supreme Court noted that the Jharkhand State Information Commission has remained non-functional since May 2020. In January 2025, the Court had issued time-bound directions for its revival. Owing to the absence of a Leader of Opposition in the Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha, the Court had directed the largest opposition party, BJP, to nominate a member to the Selection Committee specifically for selecting the Chief and other information commissioners, with a timeline of nine weeks for completion.
The matter has now been listed for further hearing on October 27, 2025.
The petitioners in the case (Miscellaneous Application 1979 of 2019) include Anjali Bhardwaj, Commodore Lokesh Batra (Retd), and Amrita Johri, represented by advocates Prashant Bhushan and Rahul Gupta.

Comments

TRENDING

New UPF study strengthens case for statutory controls on junk food advertising

Counterview News   A randomized controlled trial published in the journal Nature Metabolism has found that ultra-processed foods (UPFs) trigger metabolic and neural responses distinct from minimally processed foods—even when the two meals are nutritionally identical. The study provides direct experimental evidence that food processing itself influences health through mechanisms beyond calories and macronutrients alone.

Kamal Mitra Chenoy, scholar and student activist who never stopped being both

By Harsh Thakor*  Professor Kamal Mitra Chenoy, who taught comparative politics and the Indian Constitution at the School of International Studies (SIS), Jawaharlal Nehru University, died on October 11. He was 75. A political scientist and public intellectual, he was known for his work on international relations, peace and conflict resolution, human rights and democratic values, and for his solidarity with students.

From air pollution to nuclear war: Capitalism's seventeen deadly outputs

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The Lancet Commission's report on "21st Century Global Threats to Health" identifies seventeen interconnected crises threatening life on Earth: air pollution, antimicrobial resistance, childhood malnutrition, the collapse of development and health assistance, conventional conflicts, high alcohol use, high blood pressure, income inequality, low educational attainment, the malicious use of AI, nuclear conflict, obesity, pandemics, poor mental health, smoking, and unhealthy aging.