Skip to main content

Beyond freebies: How poor people's hidden contributions fund state coffers

By Prof. Hamentkumar Shah* 
A widespread impression in India, carefully cultivated by the wealthy, is that only the rich bear the nation’s tax burden, while the poor pay nothing. This is a falsehood, even a conspiracy, reinforced further by claims that governments provide everything to the poor free of cost. Whatever is distributed as subsidies or welfare is often disparagingly labeled as “freebies.” But is it really true that the poor do not pay taxes?
When GST concessions are announced, it is said that taxes on essential goods have been reduced or eliminated. This itself proves that such goods were already taxed and that the poor were indeed paying. Even when the final product is exempt, the machinery or raw materials used in its production carry duties such as GST or customs tax, and these costs are inevitably built into the price. The consumer, including the poor, ends up paying indirectly.
In reality, every rupee that the government earns through GST, customs duty, or excise duty includes contributions from the poor. When a poor man buys a shirt, the button on it may not carry tax, but the machinery used to produce it does, which raises the cost of the shirt. A family that erects a shack out of wood, plastic, cloth, or bricks is indirectly paying the taxes levied on those materials or on the machinery that produced them. A vegetable vendor who buys a cart pays for the taxes built into its wood, tires, and other fittings. Even a poor woman who pays a dentist two hundred rupees for tooth extraction contributes to government revenue because that fee includes taxes on the doctor’s income, on medical instruments, and on the clinic’s infrastructure.
GST was introduced in 2017–18, bringing the government ₹4.43 lakh crore in its first year. Except for the pandemic year, revenues have steadily grown, with an estimated ₹10.62 lakh crore last year and ₹11.78 lakh crore projected for the current year. In just seven years, GST revenue has more than doubled. From 2017–18 to 2024–25, total GST collections reached ₹57.37 lakh crore. Against this, recent tax reliefs amounting to ₹48,000 crore are negligible.
According to the 2025–26 Union Budget, the government’s total tax revenue will be about ₹42.70 lakh crore, of which ₹14.22 lakh crore will be transferred to states and the rest retained by the Centre. GST alone contributes about 18 percent of this revenue, customs 4 percent, and excise 5 percent, making indirect taxes together nearly 27 percent of government income. By contrast, direct taxes—income tax at 22 percent and corporate tax at 17 percent—together form 39 percent. But even corporate tax is effectively an indirect levy, since companies typically pass the burden on to consumers by adjusting prices.
Thus, nearly 44 percent of central government revenue comes from taxes that are borne directly or indirectly by ordinary consumers, including the poor. To claim that the poor pay nothing is misleading. In truth, even the poorest citizens contribute through both direct and hidden taxes. That is why the Constitution’s Directive Principles of State Policy do not merely justify subsidies for the poor but envision broader welfare measures as essential for justice and equality.
---
*Senior economist based in Ahmedabad 

Comments

TRENDING

The 'Dr' debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong   The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.