Skip to main content

Beyond freebies: How poor people's hidden contributions fund state coffers

By Prof. Hamentkumar Shah* 
A widespread impression in India, carefully cultivated by the wealthy, is that only the rich bear the nation’s tax burden, while the poor pay nothing. This is a falsehood, even a conspiracy, reinforced further by claims that governments provide everything to the poor free of cost. Whatever is distributed as subsidies or welfare is often disparagingly labeled as “freebies.” But is it really true that the poor do not pay taxes?
When GST concessions are announced, it is said that taxes on essential goods have been reduced or eliminated. This itself proves that such goods were already taxed and that the poor were indeed paying. Even when the final product is exempt, the machinery or raw materials used in its production carry duties such as GST or customs tax, and these costs are inevitably built into the price. The consumer, including the poor, ends up paying indirectly.
In reality, every rupee that the government earns through GST, customs duty, or excise duty includes contributions from the poor. When a poor man buys a shirt, the button on it may not carry tax, but the machinery used to produce it does, which raises the cost of the shirt. A family that erects a shack out of wood, plastic, cloth, or bricks is indirectly paying the taxes levied on those materials or on the machinery that produced them. A vegetable vendor who buys a cart pays for the taxes built into its wood, tires, and other fittings. Even a poor woman who pays a dentist two hundred rupees for tooth extraction contributes to government revenue because that fee includes taxes on the doctor’s income, on medical instruments, and on the clinic’s infrastructure.
GST was introduced in 2017–18, bringing the government ₹4.43 lakh crore in its first year. Except for the pandemic year, revenues have steadily grown, with an estimated ₹10.62 lakh crore last year and ₹11.78 lakh crore projected for the current year. In just seven years, GST revenue has more than doubled. From 2017–18 to 2024–25, total GST collections reached ₹57.37 lakh crore. Against this, recent tax reliefs amounting to ₹48,000 crore are negligible.
According to the 2025–26 Union Budget, the government’s total tax revenue will be about ₹42.70 lakh crore, of which ₹14.22 lakh crore will be transferred to states and the rest retained by the Centre. GST alone contributes about 18 percent of this revenue, customs 4 percent, and excise 5 percent, making indirect taxes together nearly 27 percent of government income. By contrast, direct taxes—income tax at 22 percent and corporate tax at 17 percent—together form 39 percent. But even corporate tax is effectively an indirect levy, since companies typically pass the burden on to consumers by adjusting prices.
Thus, nearly 44 percent of central government revenue comes from taxes that are borne directly or indirectly by ordinary consumers, including the poor. To claim that the poor pay nothing is misleading. In truth, even the poorest citizens contribute through both direct and hidden taxes. That is why the Constitution’s Directive Principles of State Policy do not merely justify subsidies for the poor but envision broader welfare measures as essential for justice and equality.
---
*Senior economist based in Ahmedabad 

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor*  Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Public money, private profits: Crop insurance scheme as goldmine for corporates

By Vikas Meshram   The farmer in India is not merely a food provider; he is the soul of the nation. For centuries, enduring natural calamities and bearing debt generation after generation while remaining loyal to the soil, this community now finds itself trapped in a different kind of crisis. In February 2016, the Modi government launched the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) with the stated objective of freeing farmers from the shackles of debt. It was an ambitious attempt to provide a strong safety net to cultivators repeatedly devastated by excessive rainfall, drought, and hailstorms.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution. 

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan*    The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.