Skip to main content

Behind the hype of GST reforms: Relief for citizens or windfall for corporates?

By Sunil Kumar* 
On September 22, 2025, the country implemented GST reform, being promoted as the “New Generation GST Reform.” Prime Minister Modi presented this reform to the people through his address to the nation from the Red Fort ramparts on September 21, 2025. The BJP and BJP-ruled state governments are celebrating this as the “GST Savings Festival” fortnight (September 22–29). All BJP MPs and ministers have been instructed to reach out to shopkeepers and people in markets and on the streets. But if this GST reform is truly a “savings festival,” then does that mean that since July 1, 2017, the country has been experiencing a “loot festival”? The figures confirm that under GST, a significant portion of the people’s hard-earned money has been taken away by the government and corporate elites.
Between July 1, 2017 and August 2025, ₹128 lakh crore has been collected through GST. In FY 2018–19, collections were ₹11.78 lakh crore, which rose to ₹22.08 lakh crore in FY 2024–25—nearly doubling in six years. This increase has come primarily through indirect extraction from the poor.
GST Revenue Collection by Year (₹ crore)
2017–18 (9 months): 7,40,650
2018–19: 11,77,368
2019–20: 12,22,116
2020–21: 11,36,805
2021–22: 14,83,291
2022–23: 18,07,680
2023–24: 20,18,249
2024–25: 22,08,861
Sources:
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gross-net-gst-revenue-collections-month-march-2025.html
https://gstcouncil.gov.in/gst-revenue?page=1
According to Oxfam, 64.3% of GST collections come from the poorest 50% of Indians, while the richest 10% contribute only 3–4%. The middle 40% contribute around 33%. Meanwhile, 1% of Indians own 40.6% of the country’s wealth, the top 10% own 72%, and the poorest 50% own just 3%. This means those with the least assets are paying the most GST, while the wealthy contribute little. Unsurprisingly, corporate wealth has skyrocketed. In 2022, the income of India’s richest person rose by 46%, as confirmed by Oxfam.
The Finance Ministry informed Parliament that the 18% GST slab contributes about 75% of total GST revenue. This slab covers everyday goods like hair oil, toothpaste, ice cream, pasta, restaurant meals, and cinema tickets under ₹100. Opposition leaders therefore call it the “Gabbar Singh Tax.” But even this comparison is inaccurate, because Gabbar Singh looted the rich to give to the poor—whereas under GST, the poor are looted to benefit the rich. In truth, GST means: “Take from the poor, give to the rich”—a true “loot festival.”
The Reality After GST Implementation
When GST was introduced at midnight on July 1, 2017, the government claimed it would benefit the nation and the public. It promised to replace 15 central and state taxes with a single tax, charged only once, with lower slabs making goods cheaper.
In practice, the opposite occurred. Corporates recalculated prices using the maximum retail price (MRP) as the base for GST, or reduced product weights. The result was rampant inflation. For example:
- A two-wheeler costing ₹60,000 rose to ₹1,20,000.
- A refrigerator once ₹15,000 cost ₹25,000.
- Fortune oil selling at ₹80–90 per liter shot up to ₹170–180.
- A ₹2 packet of Parle-G biscuits during lockdown now costs ₹5.
Corporate profits soared like rockets while ordinary people struggled.
No Relief Despite Rate Cuts
Even after slab reductions, the prices of daily goods have not fallen. Yet some MPs claim that a ₹100 item now costs ₹40–45—a cruel joke on the people.
Ahead of revisions, companies raised prices, as in 2017. According to Navbharat Times (Sept 22, 2025), ghee prices rose by ₹30 per kg, toothpaste from ₹75 to ₹90, and Adani’s cement companies raised prices by ₹30–40 per bag. Old stocks are sold at old prices, while new stock is costlier. Toy dealer Rajiv Batra remarked that while some relief exists, the stress is greater—musical toys, for instance, now face 18% GST instead of 12%, making them more expensive.
As in 2017, confusion persists. Small traders remain troubled, selling at old rates while the government aggressively promotes claims of cheaper goods.
Between July 1, 2017 and July 13, 2022, GST slabs were amended 907 times. This shows GST was introduced without preparation and repeatedly altered to favor corporates.
Impact on Federalism and States’ Rights
With GST, states virtually lost their independent taxation powers. All decisions now rest with the GST Council, where the central government dominates. This has eroded the federal structure, with non-BJP states also alleging withholding of GST funds.
Ironically, Narendra Modi opposed GST as Gujarat Chief Minister, but as Prime Minister he introduced it at midnight. Modi often glorifies failures—as seen in demonetization or the sudden Covid lockdown. Similarly, under GST, public burdens and opposition criticism are packaged as “celebrations.”
The Modi government claims people saved ₹2 lakh crore due to slab cuts. But it does not explain how GST collections doubled from ₹11.78 lakh crore in 2018–19 to ₹22.08 lakh crore in 2024–25, or how corporate wealth rose at rocket speed, with one billionaire’s wealth growing by 46% in a year. Why have essential goods not become cheaper? Why not abolish GST entirely and tax corporates directly? These questions remain unanswered.
Thus, for the common people, this is not a “savings festival,” but a “loot festival.”

Comments

TRENDING

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Kolkata dialogue flags policy and finance deficit in wetland sustainability

By A Representative   Wetlands were the focus of India–Germany climate talks in Kolkata, where experts from government, business, and civil society stressed both their ecological importance and the urgent need for stronger conservation frameworks. 

'Fraudulent': Ex-civil servants urge President to halt Odisha tribal land dispossession

By A Representative   A collective of 81 retired civil servants from the Constitutional Conduct Group has written to the President of India expressing alarm over what they describe as the wrongful dispossession of tribal lands in Odisha’s Rayagada district. The letter, dated April 19, 2026, highlights violent clashes in Kantamal village where police personnel reportedly injured over 70 tribal residents attempting to protect their community rights. 

Dhandhuka violence: Gujarat minority group seeks judicial action, cites targeted arson

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat has written to the Director General of Police seeking judicial action in connection with recent violence in Dhandhuka town of Ahmedabad district, alleging targeted attacks on properties belonging to members of the Muslim community following a fatal altercation between two bike riders on April 18.

Maoist activity in India: Weakening structures, 'shifts' in leadership, strategy and ideology

By Harsh Thakor*  Recent statements by government representatives have suggested that Maoism in India has been effectively eliminated, citing the weakening of central leadership and intensified security operations. These claims follow sustained counterinsurgency efforts across key regions, including central and eastern India. However, available information from security agencies and independent observers indicates that while the organizational structure of the CPI (Maoist) has been significantly disrupted, elements of the movement remain active. Reports acknowledge the continued presence of cadres in certain forested regions such as Bastar and parts of Dandakaranya, alongside smaller, decentralized units adapting their operational strategies.

Why link women’s reservation to delimitation? The unspoken political calculus

By Vikas Meshram*  April 16, 2026, is likely to be recorded as a special day in the history of Indian democracy. In a three-day special session of Parliament, the central government is set to introduce a comprehensive package of three historic bills: the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026; the Delimitation Bill, 2026; and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The stated purpose of all three is the same: to implement the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Constitutional Amendment) passed in 2023. However, the political intent concealed behind these measures — and their impact on the federal balance — is far more profound. It is absolutely essential to understand this.

From Manesar to Noida: Workers take to streets for bread, media looks away

By Sunil Kumar*   Across several states in India, a workers’ movement is gathering momentum. This is not a movement born of luxury or ambition, nor a demand for power-sharing within the state. At its core lies a stark and basic plea: the right to survive with dignity—adequate food, and wages sufficient to afford it.

Catholic union opposes FCRA amendments, warns of threat to Church institutions

By A Representative   The All India Catholic Union (AICU) has raised serious concerns over what it describes as growing threats to religious freedom, minority rights, and constitutional safeguards in India, warning that recent policy and legislative trends could undermine the country’s secular and federal framework.

Midnight weeping: The sociology of tragic vision in Badri Narayan’s poetry

By Ravi Ranjan*  Badri Narayan, a distinguished Hindi poet and social scientist, occupies a unique position in contemporary Indian intellectual life by bridging the worlds of creative literature and critical social inquiry. His poetic journey began significantly with the 1993 collection 'Saca Sune Hue Kaï Dina Hue' (Truth Heard Many Days Ago). As a social historian and cultural anthropologist, Narayan pioneered a methodological shift away from elite archives toward the oral traditions and folk myths of marginalized communities. He eventually legitimized "folk-ethnography" as a rigorous academic discipline during his tenure as Director of the G.B. Pant Social Science Institute.