Skip to main content

From isolation to integration: How Russia, China, and India are reshaping the world order

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in China has underscored the shifting direction of global politics. Efforts to isolate Russia have failed, and Europe’s Russophobia has backfired, pushing Moscow to deepen ties with China and the Global South. Russia–China energy cooperation, in particular, will have long-term consequences for Europe, once heavily dependent on Russian gas.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s penchant for public bullying alienated many global leaders. His unnecessary comments on the Russia–China–India engagement at the SCO only hardened India’s resolve to participate more actively in the grouping. Until recently, India was seen as hesitant in SCO matters. Ironically, U.S. pressure and attempted humiliation nudged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to alter course.
For any durable diplomacy, the principle must remain clear: sovereign countries—whether India, Russia, or Venezuela—must be free to choose their partners. India does not require permission from Washington or Brussels to frame its foreign policy. Unfortunately, the Trump administration often displayed undiplomatic behavior that resembled street-level aggression rather than statesmanship.
Washington’s renewed interest in a “regime change” operation in Venezuela is likely to fuel unrest in South America, just as similar interventions created instability in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Plans against Iran, often pushed in tandem with Israel, will only deepen the global crisis. What remains troubling is the inability—or unwillingness—of the U.S. to restrain its closest ally, Israel, leading many to ask: who influences whom?
Every nation today prioritizes its own interests. India engages both Russia and Ukraine; China supports Pakistan but values India’s economic and cultural weight; Russia negotiates with the U.S. while strengthening its China ties. Turkey too juggles contradictory alliances. Such pragmatism is not hypocrisy but the very essence of diplomacy.
Unfortunately, in the age of social media, loud posturing often overshadows nuanced diplomacy. Modi’s domestic image-building—through edited visuals portraying him as a global master of diplomacy—only provokes counter-narratives. Allegations of betrayal, such as Russia speaking with Pakistan, miss the point. International summits are forums for dialogue; engagement across divides is natural, not scandalous.
What truly damages diplomacy is the kind of behavior Trump displayed—publicly mocking Ukraine’s President Zelensky, patronizing Liberia’s leader for his “wonderful English,” and lecturing South Africa’s president about internal affairs. Such condescension signals disrespect and weakens trust.
India’s foreign policy is ultimately shaped by economics. Many Modi supporters abroad—particularly in the U.S., U.K., and Europe—have vested business interests, discouraging any deterioration of ties. Likewise, Gujarat-based businesses with Chinese investments see Beijing as indispensable. The Russian oil trade enriched companies but hardly benefited ordinary Indians. Personal relationships matter, but economic realities remain paramount.
Contrary to Western stereotypes, Russian leaders understand English but often avoid speaking it publicly to prevent misinterpretations. Their preference for written statements highlights a professionalism absent in the casual, sometimes careless style of U.S. diplomacy.
Since the Second World War, the world has changed dramatically. The war in Ukraine is reshaping global alignments, while the European Union’s political missteps are pushing it toward isolation, with individual states asserting independent policies. A prolonged conflict will only weaken Europe further.
What the world needs today is stability. Another global recession or a wider war could unleash an unprecedented crisis. Every effort must be made to end conflicts—not only in Ukraine, but also in Gaza and Venezuela. A peace-driven economy would be far more durable and democratic than one fueled by militarism, which serves only elites in Brussels, London, and Washington.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs. 

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.