Civil society apprehensive: Supreme Court hearing on April 2 may impact forest dwellers’ rights

By A Representative

The Supreme Court is set to hear the case Wildlife First and Ors. vs Union of India and Ors. (WP 109/2008) on April 2nd, which challenges the constitutionality of the Forest Rights Act, 2006 (FRA). The outcome may have significant implications for forest-dwelling communities across India.

The FRA was enacted to recognize the rights of traditional forest dwellers, many of whom belong to Adivasi communities, over land they have historically occupied. The law aimed to address past injustices stemming from colonial-era forest policies that designated large areas as government-controlled forests. However, implementation challenges have led to numerous claim rejections at both the Central and State levels.

In 2019, the Supreme Court issued an eviction order for rejected claimants after a hearing in which the Central government did not actively defend the FRA. The order affected approximately 1.7 million families but was later put on hold following protests, with the Court directing a review of claim rejections. Reports indicate that this review process has been inconsistent, leading to concerns about due process.

The petitioners, including retired forest officials and wildlife NGOs, seek to challenge key provisions of the FRA, including community rights over forest management. They advocate for decision-making authority to remain with forest officials.

Civil society organizations have called on the Central and State governments to take a clear stance on the FRA and ensure that the rights of forest dwellers are protected. They emphasize the need for:

1. A robust defense of the FRA in court.

2. A transparent and fair review of rejected claims.

3. Policies that balance conservation efforts with the rights of forest-dwelling communities.

Organizations following the case include:

- Adivasi Mahasabha Gujarat

- Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Gujarat

- People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Gujarat

- National Alliance of People’s Movements, Gujarat

The hearing’s outcome could have a lasting impact on forest governance and the rights of millions of people across the country.

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Vande Mataram and the politics of distraction: When patriotism replaces performance

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan There is an old saying: “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” Samuel Johnson was not criticising love for one’s country; he was warning against those who weaponise patriotic symbolism to escape accountability. In India today, that warning feels uncomfortably relevant.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha* In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.

Counterview

Search This Blog