Skip to main content

National Federation of Indian Women condemns misogynist judgments, demands judicial accountability

By A Representative 
The National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW) has held a press conference at the Press Club of India, New Delhi, strongly condemning recent regressive and patriarchal judgments by various High Courts that undermine women’s and children’s rights. The organization expressed deep distress over rulings that trivialize sexual violence, impose marriage as a "solution" for crimes, and blatantly disregard laws like the POCSO Act.  
NFIW highlighted a shocking March 19, 2025, ruling by the Allahabad High Court, where Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra stated that "grabbing the breast of a girl and breaking her pant string is not an attempt to rape, but an attempt to sexually molest." The case involved an 11-year-old girl attacked by two men in Uttar Pradesh’s Kasganj in 2021. Despite the accused attempting to push her under a bridge, the court dismissed it as mere "preparation," not an "attempt to rape," violating Section 7 of the POCSO Act, which defines such acts as sexual assault.  
Syeda Hameed, NFIW President, said, "If touching breasts and opening a pant string is not an attempt to rape, what is? This judgment mocks the POCSO Act and decades of women’s struggles."  
NFIW also criticized judgments where courts imposed marriage as a condition for bail or case closure in POCSO cases, undermining the law’s strict stance on child sexual abuse. Examples include the Allahabad High Court (2024), which granted bail to a POCSO accused on condition he marry the minor victim, and the Madras High Court (2016), which quashed a POCSO case after the accused married the 17-year-old survivor.  
Nisha Sidhu, NFIW General Secretary, stated, "Judges are violating constitutional rights to equality. Such rulings must have consequences—removal from office and recorded reprimands."  
Other concerning rulings cited by NFIW include the Bombay High Court (2021), which acquitted a POCSO accused for lack of "skin-to-skin contact," the Madhya Pradesh High Court (2020), which ordered a sexual assault accused to get a rakhi tied by the victim, and the Punjab & Haryana High Court (2017), which granted bail in a gang rape case, blaming the victim’s "promiscuous attitude."  
NFIW’s demands include the revocation of the Allahabad HC judgment and removal of Justice Mishra for disregarding constitutional principles, strict directives from the Chief Justice of India against gender-biased judgments, punitive action against judges delivering regressive verdicts, including entries in their service records, and mandatory gender sensitization programs for the judiciary.  
Annie Raja, NFIW Vice-President, warned, "These judgments embolden perpetrators and institutionalize patriarchy. We will launch a nationwide campaign for accountability."  
NFIW urged the media and public to challenge such rulings, emphasizing that justice cannot be sacrificed at the altar of patriarchal norms.  

Comments

TRENDING

Beyond the 'silent relocation' narrative in Bangladesh's Chittagong Hill Tracts

By Dr. Mohammad Asaduzzaman*  In recent years, a narrative has emerged from the rugged and forested terrain of the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), portraying the region as the site of a “silent relocation” — a mass forced migration of Bangladesh’s non-Muslim ethnic communities into neighboring India and Myanmar.

Ram, Bam and Bengal: Memories of a Left turn toward the Right

By Rajiv Shah   The BJP ’s massive electoral win in West Bengal is being interpreted across political persuasions — except, of course, by the BJP itself — as the result of the alleged deletion of around 90 lakh voters from the electoral rolls during the controversial intensive revision process. This may well be true, given my own experience in Gujarat regarding the shoddy manner in which electoral revisions have often been conducted. In West Bengal, there also appeared to be a political angle to the exercise. But I am not interested in discussing that here, as enough has already appeared in the media on the subject.

The farmer's burden: How oil, war, and climate are rewriting the price of food

By Vikas Meshram   The scorching flames of the Middle East conflict are now slowly reaching the kitchens of ordinary people. The true price of this war is paid in daily markets, vegetable shops, and in the shattered minds of farmers. Expensive crude oil, skyrocketing fertilizer prices, and rising agricultural costs are together creating the conditions for global food inflation — and this crisis is directly tied to what people eat and drink every day.