Pivotal figure in Indian cricket's renaissance, Eknath Solkar was a fielding star who redefined close-in catching

By Harsh Thakor*

Born on March 18, 1948, Eknath Dhondu Solkar, arguably the greatest forward short-leg fielder in cricket history, sadly passed away on June 26, 2005, at the age of 57, due to a heart attack. He had been battling diabetes and other ailments for some time. His name remains an enduring star in the hearts of cricket fans.

Solkar was a pivotal figure in Indian cricket's renaissance, playing a crucial role in the historic series victories in the West Indies and England in 1971.

Playing 27 Tests for India, primarily for his exceptional fielding, he took 53 catches. Solkar epitomized athleticism at its highest level. Watching him take a catch was akin to witnessing an acrobat or magician, pushing the boundaries of fielding into legendary realms. He brought a new spirit to the field, redefining the art of close-in catching.

Solkar specialized in forward short-leg, fielding without protective gear in an era when it was standard practice. Bishan Singh Bedi, who benefited greatly from Solkar's lightning reflexes and anticipation, remarked upon his death, "We would not have been the same bowlers without him."

He was also a reliable lower-order batsman, scoring over 1000 Test runs at an average of just over 25, and took 18 wickets with his slow-medium pace and chinaman deliveries.

In a 16-year first-class career, he scored 6,851 runs at 29.27, including eight centuries, took 276 wickets at 30.01, and claimed 190 catches. In his 27 Tests, he scored 1,068 runs at 25.42 and took 18 wickets at 59.44.

A gentle and versatile cricketer, he was sometimes called "a poor man's Sobers" due to his all-round abilities, capable of batting, bowling both fast and slow, and taking spectacular catches.

Solkar is also remembered for dismissing Geoff Boycott four times in 1971, famously sledging him with phrases like, "I'll get you, bloody." Boycott was so troubled by Solkar's bowling that he withdrew from the Test series. He also famously told Garry Sobers, "You play your game and I'll play mine," when Sobers attempted to intimidate him.

His fielding was instrumental in supporting India's spin quartet of Bedi, Chandrasekhar, Prasanna, and Venkataraghavan in the 1970s. Tall, athletic, and agile, Solkar mastered the dangerous forward short-leg position with his supple arms, quick reflexes, sharp eyesight, keen anticipation, and unwavering concentration – all without protective gear. His two-handed, diving catches were unique among close-in fielders.

When asked about his success, Solkar, affectionately known as "Ekky," simply said, "I only watch the ball." In a match against Australia in Calcutta in 1969-70, he took a remarkable catch off Bill Lawry, prompting Lawry to gift him his bat.

Humble Beginnings

Solkar's rise to Test cricket was remarkable, given his humble origins. The son of the groundsman at the PJ Hindu Gymkhana in Mumbai, he began by changing scoreboards. He shared a small, one-room quarter with his parents and five siblings. He started his career as a schoolboy cricketer, touring Sri Lanka in 1964 and later captaining the Indian schoolboys, including Sunil Gavaskar and Mohinder Amarnath, against London Schools in 1965-66. He developed a reputation as a world-class fielder, left-arm spinner, and solid batsman. He spent two seasons with the Sussex second XI, qualifying for the first team, but only played one match for the county.

He learned his cricket at the Gymkhana ground and joined the Bombay team in 1965. He scored a duck in his first innings but batted resiliently in the second, helping India draw the Test. His dedication to Bombay was evident in the 1968 Ranji Trophy final against Bengal, where he helped secure a crucial first-innings lead, despite his father's death the previous evening.

Test Career

He made his Test debut against New Zealand in Hyderabad in 1969-70, volunteering for the challenging short-leg position. He had a good series against Australia at home.

His consistent batting and spectacular catches in the West Indies in 1971 elevated him to stardom. In his first overseas Test in Kingston, he scored a gritty 61 in a 137-run partnership with Dilip Sardesai. He contributed to another crucial partnership in the fourth Test in Bridgetown, helping India save the match and win the series.

His experience in English conditions led to him opening the bowling with Abid Ali in the 1971 series. At Lord's, he scored 67 in a 92-run partnership with Gundappa Viswanath, giving India a first-innings lead. At The Oval, his catches of Alan Knott and Keith Fletcher were vital in India's victory. His catch of Knott, diving full-length to take the ball inches from the ground, was considered his finest. He also took 3 for 28 in the first innings and scored 44.

Despite limited success with bat and ball in the 1972-73 home series against England, he took 12 catches. His dismissal of Boycott in three consecutive innings was a highlight of the 1974 tour of England.

His only Test century, a painstaking 102 against the West Indies in Mumbai in 1974-75, marked his final significant contribution to Test cricket.

---

*Freelance journalist

Comments

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey* Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan* “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria* Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74.

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor* Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan* The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha* The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel* The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Search This Blog