Skip to main content

Why Israel has failed to achieve its objective of vanquishing Hamas despite heavy casualties

By Sandeep Pandey* 
During the 7 October, 2023 attack by Hamas, 1195 Israelis were killed and 251 taken as hostages. There was worldwide condemnation of the ‘terrorist’ attack carried out by Hamas. In response Israel has killed approximately 70,000 Palestinians, which includes about 15,000 missing or presumed dead, close to 60% of whom are women, children and elderly and still continues to kill Palestinians on one pretext or the other.
Before the 2023 war began, 5200 Palestinian prisoners were in Israeli jails or captivity. The numbers increased to 10,000 by November, 2023. There is a category called Administrative Detention which allows Israel to keep Palestinians without any charge or trial indefinitely. Since 1967, 10 lakhs Palestinians have been in Israeli jails, which is 18% of the total Palestinian population. 40% male Palestinian population has been to Israeli jails at some time or other.
Soon after the war began Hamas offered a deal ‘everyone for everyone,’ implying release of all hostages held captive by Hamas in exchange for all prisoners in Israeli jails. In November 2023, Israel released 240 prisoners in exchange for Hamas releasing 81 Israeli, 23 Thai and 1 Filipino hostages, who had come to Israel to work as labourers. However, this 6 day truce worked out by Qatar after negotiations with Israel and Hamas did not last long and war resumed with Israel bent upon getting the hostages released through military action.
Israel continues its policy of detaining Palestinians. For every Palestinian released Israel arrested another Palestinian. More Palestinians were arrested than were released. That is how the numbers in Israeli captivity doubled. On 24 January, 2024 Isreal re-arrested a teenager who was released in violation of the terms of  agreement for swap. Whereas much hue and cry was made of hundreds of Israeli hostages, the thousands of Palestinian detainees were not being considered as hostages.
More death and destruction followed in Gaza as well as in West Bank in 2024. The suffering of Palestinians has always been disproportionate to that of Israelis.
Finally, a truce was arrived at by the intervention of Qatar, Egypt and US. It was going to be implemented in three phases. As part of first phase starting on 19 January, 2025, Hamas agreed to release hostages in eight stages in exchange for prisoners to be freed from Israeli captivity. This was to be accompanied by Palestinians returning to North Gaza and an increase in humanitarian aid. As part of second phase more hostages were to be released in exchange for more prisoners and Israeli Army was supposed to completely withdraw from occupied areas of Gaza. In the third phase reconstruction of Gaza was to be undertaken. Wounded Palestinians were allowed to go to Egypt for the first time since war began in the first phase itself.
The first phase has been successfully completed. On 19 January, 2025, 3 Israeli female hostages were released in exchange for 90 Palestinian prisoners and aid trucks with food and fuel were allowed to enter Gaza through the Rafa crossing. On 25 January, 4 Israeli female soldier hostages were released in exchange for 200 Palestinian prisoners. On 30 January, 3 Israeli hostage were released in exchange for 110 Palestinian prisoners. On 1 February, 3 Israeli hostages were released for 183 Palestinian prisoners. On 8 February, again 3 Israeli hostages were exchanged for 183 prisoners from various Israeli jails. On 15 February, 3 Israelis were freed in return for 369 Palestinians freed from Israeli jails. On 20 February, bodies of 3 Israeli hostages were released, however, the fourth body was discovered to be not that of Shiri Bibas, as was claimed earlier, and hence was returned to Hamas. On 22 February, 6 Israeli hostages were released but Israel went back on its word and did not release any Palestinian prisoners as body of Shiri Bibas was not yet handed over. Subsequently, the same day body of Shiri Bibas was located and handed over to Israel. On 27 February, bodies of 4 hostages were exchanged for 620 prisoners released from being detained in Gaza or from Israeli jails.
While Israel took objection to the publicised events at which Israeli hostages were being released, Israeli military was raiding houses of Palestinians who were set to be released.
Among the Palestinians released some had been in Israeli jail for two decades. For example, Bilal Yassin, 42 years, was released after being 20 years in Israeli jail.
In first phase, which was a 42 days truce, 33 hostages, including 8 bodies, were freed in exchange for about 1,755 prisoners and detainees. Total of 141 hostages have been released in the 2023 and 2025 ceasefires, of whom 114 are Israelis. In exchange, 1,995 Palestinians have been released. 59 Israeli hostages yet remain to be freed, some of whom are presumed to be dead.
Among the Israeli hostages who have died, some were slain by their captors, yet others were killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza.
However, the casualties on both sides could have been much less had Israeli government not been headstrong and continued the ceasefire in  November 2023 and completed the hostage-prisoner exchange then itself. History has shown that Israel has always had to release disproportionate number of Palestinian or Arab captives in exchange for a few Israelis. For example, when Hamas captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit in 2006, he was released in exchange for 1,027 Palestinian prisoners in 2011. In 1985 as part of Jibril Agreement, named after Ahmed Jibril, leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command, 1,150 Palestinians were released in exchange for three Israelis kidnapped by his group. In 1983 more than 4,500 Palestinian prisoners were released in exchange for six Israeli soldiers kidnapped by Fatah in the 1982 Lebanon war.
Hence even if Israel might have had an upper hand in the wars against Palestine or the neighbouring Arab nations, it has invariably ended up releasing thousands of prisoners in exchange for tens of its citizens or soldiers, live or dead.
In the just concluded war, hopefully there will be no relapse, Israel has failed to achieve its objective of vanquishing Hamas and in the end has to agree to all the conditions that Hamas has laid out from release of prisoners to withdrawal of its forces to reconstruction of Gaza. From this perspective it is Hamas which has emerged victorious even though after paying a heavy price over which it had no control.
---
*General Secretary, Socialist Party (India)

Comments

TRENDING

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto   On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes. 

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.