Skip to main content

Why is there slowdown in productivity growth despite rise of IT-driven digital environment?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
From the World Wide Web to generative artificial intelligence, the ever-changing landscape of digitalization defines this century.  From the 16-megabyte floppy disk, CDs and DVDs to multi-terabyte digital storage devices and online storage drives, the rapid evolution of innovative products and processes in digitalization is evident. These advancements are constantly accelerating due to ongoing research and developments in science and technology. 
The pace of change is so rapid that one must be a continuous learner to keep up with daily digital advancements. Digitalization has enhanced human welfare and social progress with the rise of information technology and communication. It has increased the speed of information, accessibility of goods and services to people with purchasing power and digital links. Digitalization has also increased the productive power of labour. 
However, digitalization is not necessarily leading to increased productivity growth. Such a slowdown is called digital productivity paradox. It refers to the slowdown in productivity growth despite the rise of an information technology-driven digital environment, where the nature of work, workers, and the workplace is increasingly shaped by digitalization. Prof. Erik Brynjolfsson termed it “The Productivity Paradox of IT,” building on the work of Prof. Robert Solow. As a result, it is often referred to as the Solow Paradox. This puzzle of digitalization in terms the Solow Paradox has continued to expand over the last two decades.  It appears that the slowdown in productivity growth and the rise of digitalization is occurring simultaneously.
There are several reasons behind the slowdown in productivity growth during digitalization. Unlike past technological innovations, digitalization exhibits inherent class and urban biases. The digital divide is its inevitable outcome. The process is largely controlled by a few individuals and their large platform companies, giving these corporations an unfair advantage in leveraging digitalization for productivity growth. Meanwhile, many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have struggled to reap its benefits. As a result, digitalization has reinforced the dominance of large corporations over people and their productive capacities. The concentration of power in the hands of these dominant corporations and their digital partners has led to a decline in creative competition, stifling new innovations that could drive productivity growth. The diminishing digital dividend and the slowdown in productivity growth are thus integral aspects of digital capitalism.
Public investment in digitalization by states and governments largely benefits large corporations. For example, the National Science Foundation funds various technological innovations using American taxpayers' money, yet private multinational companies like Apple Inc. reap the benefits. This is not unique to the United States but reflects a global pattern where public funds are used to fuel the expansion of private corporations. This trend has only intensified with the advancement of digitalization under digital capitalism.
Technology can enhance the productive power of labour only when workers have access to it and receive adequate technological training. The slowdown in productivity growth is not inherent to digital technology itself but rather stems from the way it is accessed, owned, managed, controlled, and distributed by a select few. Digital capitalism, like all forms of capitalism, acts as a barrier to the democratization of digitalization, leading to stagnation, corporate dominance, and a decline in productivity growth. Therefore, democratizing digital technology—through inclusive innovation, research and development, public ownership, equitable control, fair distribution, and transparent management—is essential to bridging the digital divide and reversing the slowdown in productivity growth.
The availability and accessibility of technology, technological education, training, platforms, and a digital environment for all are central to overcoming the capitalist-driven slowdown in productivity growth. This approach is essential to creating an egalitarian, transparent, democratic and prosperous digital world that is free from inequality and exploitation.

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor*  Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan*    The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution. 

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?