Skip to main content

Covid-19 emergency a scientific measure? UHO releases public questionnaire ahead of fifth lockdown anniversary

By A Representative 
As India approaches the five-year anniversary of its nationwide lockdown imposed on March 25, 2020, the United Health Organization (UHO) is inviting the public to engage in a thought-provoking exercise. The lockdown, introduced as a response to the COVID-19 emergency, was touted as a scientific measure to control the pandemic's spread. Five years on, the UHO seeks to evaluate how various aspects of the COVID-19 response align with data and scientific evidence.
Bhaskaran Raman, speaking about the initiative, stated, "This is with the motive of educating people about the science and to make them think." His words underscore the importance of reflecting on one of the most significant global events of our time.
To mark this milestone, UHO has released a five-question series aimed at encouraging critical thinking and scientific inquiry. The initiative is particularly directed at science enthusiasts, including the youth, urging them to reflect on key elements of pandemic response, such as lockdowns, testing, mask usage, and vaccine data. Participants' answers will be published on the UHO website on March 31, 2025.
The Five Questions:
1. What does scientific evidence say about the effectiveness of lockdowns in saving lives?
   - Lockdown saved millions of lives worldwide, and it helped the economy.  
   - Lockdown saved a lot of lives but affected the economy.  
   - Lockdown reduced Covid deaths but not other causes of death.  
   - Lockdown increased Covid deaths as well as overall deaths.  
2. What was the impact of Sweden's decision to keep schools open during the pandemic?
   - Sweden's children and teachers paid a heavy price for keeping schools open.  
   - Neither children nor teachers were affected disproportionately, and Sweden had among the least overall excess deaths.  
   - Children were not affected but teachers suffered.  
   - Children were affected but not teachers.  
3. What does the RT-PCR test detect?
   - Presence of live and infectious virus.  
   - Presence of live virus but may not be infectious.  
   - Presence of viral fragments which could simply be dead virus.  
   - Presence of infectious virus but may not be live.  
4. How effective are masks, based on the best available scientific evidence?
   - Masks are about 80-100% effective in preventing Covid.  
   - Masks are about 50% effective.  
   - N95 masks are 95% effective but not cloth masks.  
   - Neither N95 masks nor cloth masks have a benefit in preventing Covid spread.  
5. What is the status of long-term safety and efficacy data from COVID-19 vaccine trials?
   - Covaxin.  
   - Covishield.  
   - Pfizer.  
   - Moderna.  
   - None of them.  
Encouraging Participation
Readers can scan the provided QR code or visit this link to participate online. The first 20 correct responses in each age category will receive a book as a token of appreciation.
Through this initiative, UHO aims to foster a deeper understanding of the science behind the pandemic response and stimulate meaningful discussions. By questioning, reflecting, and learning from the past, the organization hopes to inspire informed perspectives for future challenges.

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor*  Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan*    The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution. 

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?