Aurangzeb's demonization serves political purposes, 'intimidating' Muslims through issues like cow-beef, love jihad, land jihad

By Ram Puniyani

Since the demolition of the Babri Mosque by the RSS Combine in 1992, a particular version of history, focusing on kings and their religions, is being selectively imposed on the collective social consciousness. Taking this further, communal forces are now linking history with nationalism. Interestingly, the history of the era of kingdoms is being tied to nationalism, ignoring the fact that the nation-state is a modern concept, and the idea of India emerged parallel to the struggle against colonial powers.

Communal forces are portraying Hindu kings who fought against Muslim rulers as patriots, great nationalists, and national icons. Nathuram Godse, who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi, in his book "May It Please Your Honour", described Gandhi as a "pygmy" compared to the nationalism of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj or Maharana Pratap. Today, those who share Godse's ideology are reiterating these views with greater intensity.

Recently, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Adityanath Yogi sharply criticized those glorifying historical invaders, calling it an act of treason that "new India" will not tolerate. His remarks coincided with rising demands for the removal of Mughal ruler Aurangzeb's tomb in Maharashtra's Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar district. Similarly, Dattatray Hosabale, the Sarkaryavah (General Secretary) of the RSS, questioned whether idolizing figures who opposed India's ethos was appropriate. He pointed out that advocates of the Ganga-Jamuni culture (a fusion of Hindu and Islamic cultural elements) have never idolized Dara Shikoh, Aurangzeb's elder brother and a pioneer of such ideas.

Aurangzeb is often demonized as an invader and a cruel villain. However, was he truly an invader? Aurangzeb inherited the empire from his father, Shah Jahan. The Mughal dynasty began with Babur, who ruled Kabul. Babur was invited by Rana Sanga to defeat Ibrahim Lodi, the ruler of Delhi. However, Babur ended up fighting both Rana Sanga and Ibrahim Lodi to establish his rule over the Delhi Empire.

Before Babur, India saw invasions by Greeks, Kushans, Huns, and Shakas, who eventually became part of the local populace. The Mughals were not the only rulers who came to India; the Khiljis, Ghulams, and Ghaznavids also arrived after defeating local kings. India, as we know it today, did not exist as a unified nation. Kings fought each other for power and wealth, while interactions with diverse groups like the Shakas, Huns, Kushans, and Ahoms in the East created the syncretic culture prevalent here.

Who represents the icon of the Indian nation? Yogi and Godse present Shivaji and Rana Pratap as national icons. Shivaji's administration included many Muslim generals and officers. He fought against Aurangzeb, whose army was led by Mirza Raja Jai Singh. Rana Pratap's bravery at Haldighati is commendable, but does it symbolize a fight for Indian nationalism? His army of 3,000 included 1,000 Pathans led by Hakim Khan Sur. On the other side, Akbar's army was commanded by Man Singh. The battle was not about nationalism but about mansab (rank and revenue). Even if Hindu nationalists wish to present those who fought against Muslims as national icons, the reality is more complex—it was kings versus kings, not Hindus versus Muslims.

Not all Muslim kings were cruel, nor were all Hindu kings messengers of peace. Emperor Ashoka is infamous for the Kalinga War. The Chola kings' wars with the Chalukyas were brutal; for instance, Rajendra Chola's army decapitated the Chalukya general Samudra Raj and mutilated his daughter.

Aurangzeb's demonization serves political purposes, intimidating and marginalizing Muslims through issues like cow-beef, love jihad, and land jihad. Some Muslims, facing violence and ghettoization, find a semblance of pride in Aurangzeb. However, the primary goal of demonizing Aurangzeb is political—to target today's Muslim community.

History can be presented in various ways. Hindu communalists overemphasize kings to obscure the brutalities of the caste-Varna hierarchy and the subjugation of women. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar viewed Indian history as a battle between Buddhism and Brahmanism. According to him, Buddhism emerged as a revolutionary force against Brahmanical caste-Varna values, spreading as a major religion in India and Southeast Asia under Emperor Ashoka. However, this revolution was followed by a counter-revolution led by Pushyamitra Shunga, who physically eradicated Buddhists, causing Buddhism to disappear from India until Ambedkar revived it.

The colonial period's social reforms mitigated some of the brutalities inflicted on Dalits and women, though these issues persist today. Icons like Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Jyotirao Phule, and Babasaheb Ambedkar, who fought against the caste-Varna system, deserve recognition. Where do Bhagat Singh, Ashfaqulla Khan, Gandhi, Maulana Azad, Sardar Patel, Nehru, and Subhas Chandra Bose fit in the narrative of Indian icons?

The overemphasis on the cruelties of Muslim kings serves two purposes for the Hindu nationalist project: targeting religious minorities and obscuring the Brahminical system's oppression of weaker sections of society. While leaders like the Prime Minister and the Chief Minister of Maharashtra praise films like *Chhava*, they avoid promoting films that highlight atrocities against Dalits and women. For instance, BJP leader Vijayaraje Scindia once upheld the practice of sati (the immolation of widows). Today, leaders like Yogi, Fadnavis, and Hosabale continue to exploit communal narratives.

Comments

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan In a groundbreaking study spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby , the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today.

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu. He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

Would breaking idols, burning books annihilate caste? Recalling a 1972 Dalit protest

By Rajiv Shah A few days ago, I received an email alert from a veteran human rights leader who has fought many battles in Gujarat for the Dalit cause — both through ground-level campaigns and courtroom struggles. The alert, sent in Gujarati by Valjibhai Patel, who heads the Council for Social Justice, stated: “In 1935, Babasaheb Ambedkar burnt the Manusmriti . In 1972, we broke the idol of Krishna , whom we regarded as the creator of the varna (caste) system.”

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

'Restructuring' Sahitya Akademi: Is the ‘Gujarat model’ reaching Delhi?

By Prakash N. Shah* A fortnight and a few days have slipped past that grim event. It was as if the wedding preparations were complete and the groom’s face was about to be unveiled behind the ceremonial tinsel. At 3 PM on December 18, a press conference was poised to announce the Sahitya Akademi Awards .

Search This Blog