Skip to main content

Electricity demand: Failure to explore 'less costly, more attractive' options

By Shankar Sharma* 

A recent report says: "At least 21 international organisations have written to Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and requested the Supreme Court to speedily resolve the pending case filed by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, investigating Adani Group firms for alleged overvaluation of Indonesian coal imports."
Whether the associated corruption allegations will be proved correct or not, it would have been a lot more relevant to the global society, if these organisations were to make use of their collective clout to demand drastic reduction, or complete stoppage of coal usage, or coal exports.
The associated report also indicates that "..... citing documents from George Soros-backed Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP),...". 
 Knowing well the vested interest of many dubious NGOs functioning across the international borders, one may also question the integrity/legitimacy of such appeals.
What the global society is in urgent need of is to drastically reduce the usage of fossil fuels, including coal, in order to minimise the calamitous impacts of climate change, and not one or two corruption related representations. 
In this larger context, it will not be an overstatement that the very concept of high impact or huge cost projects (whether it is in coal power, hydro power, or nuclear power) in the present scenario of global climate emergency, can be easily associated with one kind or the other corrupt policy/ practice. 
At the global level even the official allocation of a coal mine, or approval for a coal power plant, or for a high voltage power line, or a dam based hydro, or a nuclear power can be associated with corrupt practices, because a diligent analysis of all the associated costs and benefits to the larger society can unambiguously reveal that there there much more attractive and less costly options to meet the legitimate electricity demand.
So the societal efforts should be focused on persuading our authorities to adopt least cost and most beneficial options, instead of wasting our resources in representing only on such narrow objectives. The question that comes to our mind quickly in this regard is: should such proposals for coal power plants, or coal exports/ imports acceptable to the global society, or just the Indian society, keeping in view the calamitous impacts of climate change?
Should we not make efforts to root out the origin of global concerns (such as moving away from coal usage) instead of crying foul on one or more such localised issues, which apparently also have global political connotation?
---
*Power & Climate Policy 

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

India’s heatwave crisis: How concrete cities are fueling climate emergency

By Rajkumar Sinha*  According to recent studies, urban areas are witnessing a much sharper rise in temperatures than rural regions. The planet is currently heading toward an additional 1.9°C of warming — far beyond the target envisioned under the Paris Agreement . A team of climate scientists associated with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has noted that India’s average temperature increased by nearly 0.9°C during the decade between 2015 and 2024 compared to the early twentieth century (1901–1930). In western and northeastern India, the hottest day of the year has already become 1.5°C to 2°C warmer since the 1950s.

Retired civil servants slam CJI’s remarks on environmental litigants

By A Representative   An open letter issued on May 22, 2026, by the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), comprising 71 retired civil servants from the All India and Central Services, has strongly criticized recent remarks made by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) against environmental litigants.