Skip to main content

Katchatheevu between India and Sri Lanka: Let it not become a point of friction

By NS Venkataraman* 
 Katchatheevu,  a 285-acre uninhabited island in the Palk Strait, between India and Sri Lanka and  about 33 km from the Indian coast,   has suddenly become a  matter of acrimonious debate, in India today, as Indian parliamentary elections will take place in the next few days.
There have  been claim by both Sri Lanka and India, both of which were under British rule for several centuries, about the ownership of Katchatheevu for very long time.  Finally, a settlement  was reached in the year 1974, when Government of India agreed that Katchatheevu would be part of Sri Lanka, which mean that India has given  up it’s claim on Katchatheevu.
While it was thought that the matter has been settled once for all, there have been considerable unhappiness about this decision of Government of India amongst the fishing community in the coastal region in Tamil Nadu,  who have been using the Katchatheevu island for resting and drying their nets etc.  for several decades.
Election time issue
Meanwhile, some political parties in Tamil Nadu have been demanding that Katchatheevu should be claimed back by India. This thoughtless  demand has not been considered by the Government of India, and obviously this demand cannot be considered in future also. 
What is the reason for this Katchatheevu matter erupting into an explosive discussion in India today?
The reason is that the ruling party  (DMK) in Tamil Nadu  has been demanding that Katchatheevu should be retrieved and has written several letters to the Prime Minister reiterating this demand.   The DMK made it an electoral issue,  whipping up passion, particularly amongst fishermen, as a strategy for vote bank politics in the ongoing election season in India.
In this scenario, Prime Minister has pointed out that the decision to give up rights on Katchatheevu was taken by the then  Indian  Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, with the full knowledge of the then DMK Chief Minister in Tamil Nadu, and for all practical purposes then DMK government then did not protest and its members in Parliament remained silent on the matter.
The essence of the accusation of Prime Minister Modi is that while present DMK government in Tamil Nadu is demanding that Katchatheevu should be taken back by India, the fact is that it was the then DMK government and the then Congress government    who  took the decision to give up the claim on Katchatheevu.  
Further, the document released under  the  Right to Information Act reveals that the approval  of Parliament was not obtained before giving up the claim on Katchatheevu and Parliament was only informed later.
What is to be noted here is the ongoing bitter debate in India on Katchatheevu is debate between political parties in India.  Nowhere has the Indian Prime Minister or Indian Foreign Minister has stated that Katchatheevu would be taken back by India,  though some political parties in Tamil Nadu are trying to  misinterpret for political convenience to state  that Government of India would take back Katchatheevu island in future.
Need for holistic approach
It is well recognised in India that Indian fishermen face some issues, as they cannot utilise the Katchatheevu island  to carry out the fishing activity, as they were doing earlier before the year 1974.
What is required is that both Government of India and Sri Lankan government need to take a holistic view of the matter in approaching the issue,  particularly keeping in view the common interests of both the countries and historical,  traditional  and cultural relationship  between both the countries. A matured discussion between Indian government and  Sri Lankan government can certainly find a way,   that can  elegantly find a solution,  keeping the interests of fishermen in India and Sri Lanka. 
In all probability this heated discussion on Katchatheevu in India would last only till 4th of June, 2024 when the result of the parliamentary election would be declared in India.
When the dust would settle down,  an appropriate solution can be certainly arrived at.
Unfortunately, in the democratic set up in India and Sri Lanka, often politicians and  owners of some media  houses and a few journalists with vested interests   say and write provocatively to keep the issue burning  to serve their narrow political interest.
Anyway, the discerning observers both in India and Sri Lanka realise that both the countries need to have healthy and good relationships for mutual benefits. It is hoped that the Indian Prime Minister  who started the current heated discussion to expose Tamil Nadu’s ruling party DMK’s double game,  must   tone down,  to create appropriate climate for  discussions with Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan government also should not overreact  and understand the trends and utterances  during the  election period,  which seem to be similar both in India and Sri Lanka.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan   The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.