Skip to main content

Brahmanical legacy? Spineless paratroopers leaving Congress 'shouldn't worry' party

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
The so-called 'exodus' of spineless paratroopers from the Congress party should not worry anyone. At the moment, any such parasite who can abuse the Gandhis and the Congress would be seen by the Manuwadi Brahmin-Bania media as BJP's great achievement.
Most of these paratroopers actually enjoyed unlimited powers in the Congress because of their 'jaati' and their degrees from various universities abroad. They are great at 'arguments' and fight cases like a 'lawyer', which means whichever party funds them, they will twist their arguments accordingly.
Politics is not about being a 'great debater' or being 'argumentative', but also commitment to ideology and convictions. Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar used to call the Indian National Congress a Brahmanical party because it rarely spoke about social change, as most of the leaders were committed to varna dharma, and were not ready to fight for the annihilation of caste.
However, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru was a visionary, hence India developed policies which benifitted all segments of society, particularly scheduled castes and tribes (SC and ST) and other marginalised sections. Public sector undertakings grew. India under him was largely a welfare state.
The party faced a huge crisis after Indira Gandhi came to power. She nationalised banks, ended privy purses and took the issue of SCs, STs and minorities seriously. The Congress' right-wing lobby at that time led by Morarji Desai opposed all this. Desai, a staunch opponent of nationalisation of bank, failed to read what the masses wanted.
Indira Gandhi got massive mandate and all the kshatrapas were defeated. The people who left the Congress at that time and challenged Indira Gandhi were leaders of the party, but not rootless, yet they got defeated.
Right now, the people who are leaving the Congress are mostly the backyard boys of the Brahmanical elite. Many of them can't fight elections. When they did, they lost heavily. Yet they want to preside over the party and deliberate.
Rahul Gandhi's Congress gave these people more importance than what they deserved. These people remained uncomfortable with the agenda of social justice. They sang songs of secularism and against the 'economic' policies, but as soon as Rahul Gandhi spoke so eloquently for social justice, caste census and representation, these drawing room manipulators actually felt they have no space.
There is a big reality which Rahul Gandhi needs. The Congress was an ocean where all kinds of forces had space to survive, but now time has come when such adjustment will not work. All such forces could only survive in the Congress because the Brahmanical elite had control over the party.
As long as this Brahmanical elite has control of the party and power, these people were ready to sing the song of social justice, but as soon as they realised that the marginalised were seeking representation in the power structure and the Congress party was ready to accommodate them, they get panicky and looked for green pastures.
I can understand their pain as they feel that the Congress has become 'dishahin' or directionless, but if they were really committed to ideology, they should have stayed out of the BJP. They have enough money to engage with people, do social work, or even join other secular parties. But by singing the 'sanatana' rag, they have proved that they are nothing but pure believers of the Brahmin-Bania hegemony, which is being challenged, hence they moved out.
Rahul Gandhi would need to understand that even in the past the Congress was dominated by forces which had no root. Pranab Mukherjee and Ghulam Nabi Azad and many others who presided over the fate of the leaders of the party never had the courage to face the people. Mukherjee dominated the party for long but could only enter the Lok Sabha with Mamata Banerjee's support.
He would speak on anything but could not make the Congress a force in West Bengal. In the end, he started hobnobbing with RSS and BJP to be in power. Everybody knew his relations with Reliance. It was Mukherjee who mishandled the Anna Hazare movement that benefited BJP enormously.
Similarly, Ghulam Nabi Azad enjoyed everything in the party without giving the party anything. He is now happy to join NDA. The point is, the Congress needs to understand the importance of convictions and ideology as well as mass leaders. To the credit of Rahul Gandhi, the Congress is now looking towards a categorical ideological force to fight against the Sangh Parivar's tainted vision of an exclusive India which excludes the minorities and the marginalised.
Already, Narendra Modi and the Sangh Parivar do not like rights-based politics, which they feel has destroyed India. In their scheme of things, Indians should be tied to 'duties' alone, and that too as dictated by RSS and the huge number of Manuwadi babas that would preach you to follow their view f things.
Rahul Gandhi and the Congress must focus on fighting the Lok Sabha elections seriously. There is a massive undercurrent, and the Congress and the INDIA alliance partners need to focus on the issues of the people. They must speak about a united and inclusive India, where everyone grow and prosper.
All the recent "cross overs" have happened during electioneering, but it should not hurt. The Congress is getting cleansed. It does not need those who have no trust in social justice and inclusive politics. The Congress needs to honour leaders like Digvijay Singh, who has given the Congress more than any of his contemporaries. A man who remains committed to the Congress ideals and social justice, it is the Brahmanical coterie in the Congress which vilifies him.
Let the Congress and the INDIA alliance offer committed and credible pro-people candidates and start campaigning seriously. People of India are looking for a change, and without the Congress as the central figure, this wouldn't be not possible.
The Congress should wake up and fight to provide an alternative to people. Everywhere, people are realising that the Congress had always been a better alternative than any of the other parties which replaced it. Parties do make mistakes and people teach them lessons. Now it is time for the Congress to act and fight the battle seriously as India is looking for a change.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.