Skip to main content

India's anti-dumping duty on jute import 'adversely impacts' trade with Bangladesh

By Samara Ashrat* 

Will the proposed Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between India of Bangladesh be a comprehensive economic framework and an instrument to optimize the advantages of their strategic geographical landscape? 
Bangladesh is crafting strategies to start negotiations with India on the long-awaited CEPA. Indian high commissioner to Bangladesh Pranay Verma, too, recently said CEPA could be a game-changer for both the countries in terms of trade. 
However, concerns remain.
The imposition of anti-dumping duties on jute goods has had a negative impact on Bangladesh’s exports to India, as the country’s export items were already limited. Such a duty has a negative impact on our exports of jute goods as we exported more than 1.45 lakh tonnes of jute goods to the Indian market earlier. After the imposition of anti-dumping duty, the exports of the items have fallen to about 35,000 tonnes.
India is of the view that a dual policy has been implemented in the import of jute and jute products from Bangladesh for the benefit of the Indian jute mills. On the other hand, Bangladesh  demanded withdrawal of this dual policy or the imposition of additional duty tax on the import of raw jute from Bangladesh. 
According to the notification of the Indian Finance Ministry, signed on December 30, the anti-dumping duty will be effective for the next five years. The duty is required to be paid in Indian currency. The new announcement imposes different rates of anti-dumping duty on jute products exported from Bangladesh till 2027. 
According to the sources in the Ministry of Finance of India, under to the new policy, the duty of 6 dollars 3 cents to 351 dollars 72 cents per ton will be applied on the jute products of Bangladesh and Nepal.
The private jute mill owners of Bangladesh have expressed their disappointment at this decision of India. They say, as a result of this new decision, there will be another crisis in the export of jute products from Bangladesh to India. 
This may lead to closure of some more jute mills. India's jute exports will face a major threat due to the extension of the new anti-dumping duty. For the last five years, exports to India have been falling due to the imposition of tariffs. Now if we extend the term again we will lose the market completely.
Nearly 60 percent of the jute products exported from Bangladesh go to India. Since the imposition of anti-dumping duties in 2017, exports have started to decline. Many private jute mills were closed due to this.
Additionally, the decision may also affect the livelihoods of jute farmers, as well as workers in the jute manufacturing industry in Bangladesh, which relies heavily on the Indian market for its exports.
It may be ideal if the issue can be resolved through diplomatic or bilateral means before taking the matter to the WTO
It is also worth noting that this decision by India could also prompt other countries to impose similar measures, further exacerbating the negative impacts on the Bangladeshi jute industry. Also, despite India and Bangladesh considering each other as important and closest neighbours, the trade gap between the two countries will widening significantly.
In FY 2021-22, Bangladesh imported commodities worth US$14.58 billion from India, while its exports to that country were valued at only US$1.8 billion. In the fiscal year 2020-21, the figures were US$9.69 billion (import) and US$1.09 billion (export) respectively.

What remedial measures can be undertaken?

As a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), any country can challenge the imposition of anti-dumping measures through the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) mechanism. This allows for the raising of all issues related to compliance with the 
Anti-Dumping Agreement’s requirements before a panel established under the DSU. Considering the close relationship between Bangladesh and India, it may be ideal if the issues can be resolved through diplomatic or bilateral means before taking the matter to the WTO.
The commerce ministry was planning to impose restrictions on raw jute exports to India last year after India did not withdraw anti-dumping duties despite repeated requests. In this, an initiative was taken to determine the minimum export price for the export of raw jute. But that decision was not taken because of the high price of jute and the fear of loss to the local farmers.
The author
The Government of India has not taken any initiative even though the request has been made from the higher level to withdraw this duty. Only jute raw materials are exempted from this duty. Because the entrepreneurs of the jute sector of Bangladesh supply a part of the raw material required by the Indian mills. 
Due to this duty, the cost of exporting jute products in India has increased, the country's jute industry is losing Indian buyers due to the high cost of importing the product. As a result, the export of jute products from Bangladesh to India is decreasing. many mills are now closed due to lack of orders and limited production is going on in some places.
---
*PhD fellow, International Relations, University of Bucharest

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege NestlĆ©’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on NestlĆ© to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.