Skip to main content

India's anti-dumping duty on jute import 'adversely impacts' trade with Bangladesh

By Samara Ashrat* 

Will the proposed Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between India of Bangladesh be a comprehensive economic framework and an instrument to optimize the advantages of their strategic geographical landscape? 
Bangladesh is crafting strategies to start negotiations with India on the long-awaited CEPA. Indian high commissioner to Bangladesh Pranay Verma, too, recently said CEPA could be a game-changer for both the countries in terms of trade. 
However, concerns remain.
The imposition of anti-dumping duties on jute goods has had a negative impact on Bangladesh’s exports to India, as the country’s export items were already limited. Such a duty has a negative impact on our exports of jute goods as we exported more than 1.45 lakh tonnes of jute goods to the Indian market earlier. After the imposition of anti-dumping duty, the exports of the items have fallen to about 35,000 tonnes.
India is of the view that a dual policy has been implemented in the import of jute and jute products from Bangladesh for the benefit of the Indian jute mills. On the other hand, Bangladesh  demanded withdrawal of this dual policy or the imposition of additional duty tax on the import of raw jute from Bangladesh. 
According to the notification of the Indian Finance Ministry, signed on December 30, the anti-dumping duty will be effective for the next five years. The duty is required to be paid in Indian currency. The new announcement imposes different rates of anti-dumping duty on jute products exported from Bangladesh till 2027. 
According to the sources in the Ministry of Finance of India, under to the new policy, the duty of 6 dollars 3 cents to 351 dollars 72 cents per ton will be applied on the jute products of Bangladesh and Nepal.
The private jute mill owners of Bangladesh have expressed their disappointment at this decision of India. They say, as a result of this new decision, there will be another crisis in the export of jute products from Bangladesh to India. 
This may lead to closure of some more jute mills. India's jute exports will face a major threat due to the extension of the new anti-dumping duty. For the last five years, exports to India have been falling due to the imposition of tariffs. Now if we extend the term again we will lose the market completely.
Nearly 60 percent of the jute products exported from Bangladesh go to India. Since the imposition of anti-dumping duties in 2017, exports have started to decline. Many private jute mills were closed due to this.
Additionally, the decision may also affect the livelihoods of jute farmers, as well as workers in the jute manufacturing industry in Bangladesh, which relies heavily on the Indian market for its exports.
It may be ideal if the issue can be resolved through diplomatic or bilateral means before taking the matter to the WTO
It is also worth noting that this decision by India could also prompt other countries to impose similar measures, further exacerbating the negative impacts on the Bangladeshi jute industry. Also, despite India and Bangladesh considering each other as important and closest neighbours, the trade gap between the two countries will widening significantly.
In FY 2021-22, Bangladesh imported commodities worth US$14.58 billion from India, while its exports to that country were valued at only US$1.8 billion. In the fiscal year 2020-21, the figures were US$9.69 billion (import) and US$1.09 billion (export) respectively.

What remedial measures can be undertaken?

As a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), any country can challenge the imposition of anti-dumping measures through the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) mechanism. This allows for the raising of all issues related to compliance with the 
Anti-Dumping Agreement’s requirements before a panel established under the DSU. Considering the close relationship between Bangladesh and India, it may be ideal if the issues can be resolved through diplomatic or bilateral means before taking the matter to the WTO.
The commerce ministry was planning to impose restrictions on raw jute exports to India last year after India did not withdraw anti-dumping duties despite repeated requests. In this, an initiative was taken to determine the minimum export price for the export of raw jute. But that decision was not taken because of the high price of jute and the fear of loss to the local farmers.
The author
The Government of India has not taken any initiative even though the request has been made from the higher level to withdraw this duty. Only jute raw materials are exempted from this duty. Because the entrepreneurs of the jute sector of Bangladesh supply a part of the raw material required by the Indian mills. 
Due to this duty, the cost of exporting jute products in India has increased, the country's jute industry is losing Indian buyers due to the high cost of importing the product. As a result, the export of jute products from Bangladesh to India is decreasing. many mills are now closed due to lack of orders and limited production is going on in some places.
---
*PhD fellow, International Relations, University of Bucharest

Comments

TRENDING

Avoidable Narmada floods: Modi birthday fete caused long wait for release of dam waters

Counterview Desk  Top advocacy group, South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP), has accused the Sardar Sarovar dam operators for once again acting in an "unaccountable" manner, bringing "avoidable floods in downstream Gujarat."  In a detailed analysis, SANDRP has said that the water level at the Golden Bridge in Bharuch approached the highest flood level on September 17, 2023, but these "could have been significantly lower and much less disastrous" both for the upstream and downstream areas of the dam, if the authorities had taken action earlier based on available actionable information.

Biden urged to warn Modi: US can declare India as worst religious freedom offender

By Our Representative  During a Congressional Briefing held on Capitol Hill, Washington DC, Nadine Maenza, former Chair of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), has wondered why the Biden administration should raise issues of mass anti-minority mob violence  -- particularly in Haryana and Manipur -- with Modi. Modi should be told that if such violence continues, the US will be “compelled by law” to designate India as one of the world’s worst offenders of religious freedom, she urged.

From 'Naatu-Naatu' to 'Nipah-Nipah': Dancing to the tune of western pipers?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  Some critics have commented that the ecstatic response of most Indians to the Oscar for the racy Indian song, “Naatu-Naatu” from the film, “RRR” reeks of sheer racism, insulting visuals and a colonial hangover. It was perhaps these ingredients that impressed the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, one critic says.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Asset managers hold '2.8 times more equity' in fossil fuel cos than in green investments

By Deepanwita Gita Niyogi*  The world’s largest asset managers are far off track to meet the  2050 net zero commitments , a new study  released by InfluenceMap , a London-based think tank working on climate change and sustainability, says. Released on August 1, the Asset Managers and Climate Change 2023 report by FinanceMap, a work stream of InfluenceMap, finds that the world’s largest asset managers have not improved on their climate performance in the past two years.

Evading primary responsibility, ONGC decides to invest Rs 15,000 crore in sick subsidiary

By NS Venkataraman*  It is reported that Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) will infuse about Rs 15,000 crore in ONGC Petro-additions Ltd (OPaL) as part of a financial restructuring exercise. ONGC currently holds 49.36 per cent stake in (OPaL), which operates a mega petrochemical plant at Dahej in Gujarat. GAIL (India) Ltd has 49.21 per cent interest and Gujarat State Petrochemical Corporation (GSPC) has the remaining 1.43 per cent.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Sales, profits of Indian firms 'deteriorate', yet no significant increase in cost pressures

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad's (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES), a monthly exercise, has said that while cost perceptions data does not indicate significant increase of cost pressures, sales and profits of the Indian firms have deteriorated.

'State-sanctioned terror': Stop drone attack on Adivasis, urge over 80 world academics

Counterview Desk  A joint statement, “Indigenous Peoples’ Un-Freedoms and Our Academic Freedom: A Call for Solidarity”, endorsed by over 80 signatories, including international academics, activists and civil society organizations, as well as diasporic Indian academics and researchers, working with Adivasi (indigenous) communities in India, has made an urgent appeal to prevent future drone bomb attacks by the Indian state on Adivasi villages.