Skip to main content

Why bureaucrats of West Bengal at all hierarchical levels are just puppets

By Harasankar Adhikari 

Local self-government decentralises democratic power at the grass roots through the enactment of the Panchayat Raj institution in India. It is the most important and glorious step of Indian democracy. The purpose is undoubtedly unique, and it has immense importance to strengthen people's participation in the government as their own. But multi-party politics shapes it differently for political purposes. It has become a platform for rampant corruption in almost every sphere of governance. It also teaches grass-roots people how to be corrupted and how to deprive innocent people.
The government of India takes initiatives to implement all developmental programmes at the grass-roots level through the involvement of the Panchayat Raj Institution. It is an advantage to the leaders of political parties in the rule to loot public money for development.
At present, the state of West Bengal is at the top of the list for corruption at different levels. Besides, recruitment scams, coal scams, and cattle scams, a huge amount of public money for different development projects is being syphoned deliberately. For instance, wages under MGNEGRA are one important avenue of corruption. Here, political party leaders at the grass-roots level enlist and provide job cards to people who do not fall under the category of MGNEGRA beneficiaries. It includes working youth and even the elderly population who lost their physical ability to work. There is a secret nexus or agreement between the two parties. That is, after crediting the wages, they have to hand over 80% of the wages to the local leaders, who enlist their names in the pay roll. It is a huge earning for the leaders for their whole-time involvement in the particular political party (particularly in the rule). The enlisted job card holders have no objection because they have to be born with the local leaders for their peaceful living in the area. Everybody tries to avoid any political chaos.
More surprisingly, it has been noticed that a significant number of elderly people within the age bracket of 70–80 years of age are job card holders and the administration knows this. But they have no disagreement with it. The bureaucrats of West Bengal at all hierarchical levels are just puppets. They only serve the political leaders of the ruling government. They work as agents for this particular political party. The political leaders of the particular political party suppress and compress the environment.
They have to set aside the fact that in representative democracy, bureaucrats are responsible for 'ensuring equal treatment of citizens and making policy decisions on their own’. On the other hand, ‘democratic governance is assumed to be able to adjust more effectively to the needs and wants of the public than most other forms of governing'. ‘The relationship between bureaucracy and democracy is both paradoxical and complementary because an effective democracy may require an effective and well-functioning bureaucracy’. So, ‘a well-functioning bureaucracy emphasises equality, and attempts to ensure that all members of society receive the same treatment according to law, even if that style of delivery appears to be inefficient. In short, bureaucracy is put into place to minimise the arbitrary and capricious actions in which governments might otherwise be tempted to engage’.
They are beyond their independent and unbiased nature. They work according to the direction of the political leaders of the particular political party in the rule. Nowhere is there any reflection of democratic rights.
Why are the bureaucrats ‘spineless’ and paralysed?
  • They are under threat and afraid of. So, a suffering person never saves another suffering person.
  • They are afraid of primarily physical molestation and even the threat of murder, etc.
  • They are afraid of punishments like transfers, compulsory waiting, and so forth.
  • They work in support of a particular political party because of the rewards.
  • They have no responsibility to save the interest of the masses, for which they take the oath before joining their jobs.
Now, what would be the fate of people's democracy, and what would be the role of bureaucracy in a representative democracy that should be redefined and clarified? What would be the punishment for violence and murder? And would our judiciary only supplement and complement this democracy and the democratic rights of the people?

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.