Skip to main content

Sengol drama 'upper caste' move with eye on 2024 polls. Target: South Indian states

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
The new parliament building opened on February 28. However, it looked as if it is not Parliament but part of Pratinidhisabhas started by erstwhile princely states in India. The BJP for long has been acting as if India is a kingdom and Narendra Modi the new king of India. Even at the coronations of kings, you find a large number of people and dignitaries, but look at the opening ceremony -- we had only one face as if he built everything.
Modi and BJP have always loved #dynasts provided they are Brahminical in nature. All the heroes of the Sangh Parivar and Hindutva are actually dynasts and not really those who emerged from democratic struggle. They hate Jawaharlal Nehru only because he converted India to a secular democracy where people alone matter. Nehru would have turned a dictator and anointed himself as the king of India, if he had desired, but he opted for political democracy.
Many blame Nehru for being arrogant and Brahminical in his views, but there is a huge difference between Nehru, his thoughts and actions, and those of the Sangh Parivar. Those who think that Nehru and RSS are the same are actually helping the cause of Hindutva in disguise. You cannot defend the indefensible. Nehru accepted Ashok Chakra as the symbol of our republic.
Indeed, if Nehru had agreed to all that is being termed about Sengol then people like Rajagopalachari would have been happier, but he never opted for the symbol of kingdom for our new republic. The real issue is, Modi and BJP don't have much respect for history of modern India, as their organisation and leaders were on the wrong side during the struggle for freedom. They cannot erase this fact.
Hence, they go about reinventing and redirecting historical facts. And for this, they go about highlighting how great was 'Hindu' -- actually Brahminical or upper caste -- kingdom. It is a fact that Sengol has nothing to do with Cholas and more with a Mutth in Tamil Nadu. Tody this Mutth is dominated by the powerful Vellalar community.
One should observe the the context: Karnataka has rejected BJP and RSS, who have been working overtime to use the Mutths and temples for their Hindutva project. Tamil Nadu, despite Periyar's movement, has still the largest number of temples as well as caste violence against Dalits, yet the Sangh Parivar has no place in the State. Kerala, thanks to various communist and secular governments, is still a highly religious society. Hence, BJPs' target right now is South India.
The reason is simple. Its political success has reached at a saturation point in North India, where already there are contours of resurgence of Mandal forces. South has remained out of bounds for BJP. However, the party bosses think they have not lost everything. It is banking on the savarna hegemony, visible in all walks of life.
In the post-Mandal era, already, Dalits and OBCs have developed an all-India agenda. BJP, on the other hand, believes, today, savarnas, especially Brahmins, have got an all India liking for the party, known for being an expert in exploiting the insecurities of the upper castes. The whole Sengol thing is not merely meant for the new Parliament. BJP will forget it after it is used during the 2024 polls in order to blame Nehru for everything. DMK should remember: BJP will take up the challenge in Tamil Nadu and use it to denigrate the Dravidian movement.
Already, seers from Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka etc. are being used to propagate the Hindutva ideology. It is time for political parties to be careful and reach out to the people. They shouldn't allow themselves to be trapped in the Sangh Parivar propaganda to polarise people. Periyar's agenda is powerful enough. However, the Dravidian parties and those associate with it support caste violence and don't allow Dalits to live their life with dignity and self respect. They are falling in the BJP trap.
The whole drama is for the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. Opposition parts should fight the cause of India with inclusive politics. They must fight hatred and replace it with love and inclusive ideals. They must fight for the idea of India as espoused by our constitutional forefathers. They must let the secular socialist democratic republic of India live long and provide space and equal opportunities for all.
*Human rights defender


Shyam said…
Another brahmin hating journalist.Disgusting article!!!
Note: I hate Modi too.
Kiran said…
Adheenams sanyasis are non brahmins only,,
Anonymous said…
Here the word is Brahminacal, not Brahmin. The writer is criticising the Brahminical nature of the event -- an effort to appease the upper political caste in view of the ensuing polls, a requirement after Karnataka debacle


'Wedding of the century': What does Mukesh Ambani want to prove by such extravaganza?

By NS Venkataraman*  Mukesh  Ambani,   a renowned Indian industrialist who is said to be the richest person in India and  one of the richest persons in the world,   has just now conducted the wedding celebration of  his son in Mumbai,   with unheard level of lavishness in India.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'28% rise in sedition cases': Top global NGO alliance rates India's civil space 'repressed'

By Rajiv Shah Rating India's civic space as repressed , Civicus, a global civil society alliance, in its new report submitted to the UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) on the state of civic space in the country has said that the use of sedition law against the Modi government’s critics continues. "Under the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sedition cases have increased by 28 per cent with over 500 cases against more than 7,000 people", it says.

'Modi govt's assault on dissent': Foreign funds of top finance NGO blocked

By Rajiv Shah  In a surprise move, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, has cancelled the foreign funding license of the well-known advocacy group, Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA), known for critically examining India's finance and banking sectors from human rights and environmental angle.

How US is using Tibetans to provoke conflict with China 'ignoring' India

By Lobsang Tenzin*  On July 12, US President Joe Biden signed the Resolve Tibet Act, and Tibetans cheered for it, believing that the law promotes a resolution of the dispute between Tibet and China. Is this true? First, let's look at the issue of the ownership of Tibet. 

How embracing diversity enriched my life, brought profound sense of joy

By Mike Ghouse*  If you can shed the bias towards others, you'll love the connections with every human that God or his systems have created. This gives a sense of freedom and brings meaning and joy to life. Embracing and respecting how people dress, eat, and practice their beliefs becomes an enriching experience.

Post-poll mob lynching spree, bulldozer justice: NAPM seeks united resistance

Counterview Desk  Condemning what it calls "the horrific spree of mob lynchings across the country after the Lok Sabha election results", India's premier civil society network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), has called for "united resistance" against "hateful communal politics, mob lynching of religious minorities and caste-based oppression".

Maharashtra govt's proposed bill may be used against 'dissenting' journalists, writers, filmmakers, artists

Counterview Desk  The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Maharashtra, strongly objecting to what it calls “repressive and unconstitutional” Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024, has demanded the proposed law be scrapped in its entirety. In its Statement of Objects and Reasons for the Bill, PUCL noted,  the broad and non-descript label of ‘urban naxal’ has been used, which is actually a “common slur used for any citizen who expresses their opposition to state policy or is not aligned with right-wing majoritarian views."