Skip to main content

Karnataka 'warning bell': Hindutva defeated, not down, BJP may turn 'more reactionary'

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

The defeat of BJP-led Hindutva politics in Karnataka is cause for celebration and hope for India's secular constitutional democracy. The people of Karnataka rejected divisive and bigoted politics under Narendra Modi's leadership. His campaign focused on polarization, while the Congress Party led a positive campaign. The Congress Party successfully consolidated its votes and organization, countering Hindutva propaganda with its five 'guarantees' policy promises.
These guarantees include providing 200 units of free electricity to every household through 'Gruha Jyothi’, grant of Rs 2,000 to every woman heading a family through 'Gruha Lakshmi’, 10 kg of rice per month to every member of BPL families through 'Anna Bhagya’, sanctioning of Rs 3,000 to unemployed graduates and diploma holders (18-25 age group) for two years through 'Yuva Nidhi’, and offering free travel for women through the 'Shakti' scheme. These alternative policies were crucial to the Congress Party's victory.
In spite of electoral defeat, the Hindutva politics continues to enjoy significant support base in Karnataka. The BJP has secured 36% of the total votes, which highlights the reactionary political, cultural and economic to the people of Karnataka and to their secular society. Hindutva is defeated but not down. The Hindutva forces led by BJP is going to be more reactionary to consolidate their higher caste Hindu vote bank after their electoral defeat.
Therefore, it is imperative to move beyond electoral populism to deracinate Hindutva to ensure prosperity, peace and social harmony among all communities in the state. The progressive and democratic governance along with educational and cultural interventions based on material history and science can shape popular culture to dismantle Hindutva project and its base.
The decline in vote share of Left parties in the Karnataka assembly election is a disturbing outcome. These parties lost elections in all their strongholds. Some lazy political analysis attributes this to weak trade union movements and identity politics.
The Left parties got engaged in internal conflicts and formed political alliances without a clear direction, prioritizing personal differences over ideological class positions. This decline in the Left's vote share is disastrous for the working people of the state and sends a negative signal to national politics.
The political disunity among Left parties is a clear example of missed opportunities in working-class politics and the promotion of radical political consciousness. Once again, the Left parties have failed to effectively address the challenges posed by the capitalist onslaught led by Hindutva fascism in India.
The Communist parties have failed to come to an understanding for a united Left front based on issues of people. It sends a wrong signal to the masses that Left parties lack basic understanding of their everyday issues and challenges in life.
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) had its tactical alliance with the Janata Dal (Secular) and the Republican Party of India (Prakash Ambedkar faction) (RPI-K). The JD(S) has provided outside support to the alliance candidates in three seats only when RPI-K contested for ten seats and the CPI(M) contested four seats. The Socialist Unity Centre of India (Communist) [SUCI(C)] has fought in fourteen constituencies in ten districts. The Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) and Liberation (CPI-ML) have contested in two seats.
The CPI and CPI(M) candidates have fought against each other in the KGF seat where as the CPI-ML and CPI(M) have fought against each other in KR Puram (Bengaluru Urban district). The CPI(M) and SUCI(C) have contested against each other in the Gulbarga rural seat. The Left parties have fought against each other and lost in several seats without forming any form of political understandings. 
Such a political trend in Left politics only empowers reactionary political forces in the long run. The disunity of Left weakens working people, citizenship rights, and their share in the democratic politics. The electoral defeats of the Left political parties weaken the welfare and democratic state.
Left politics is the moral compass and political anchor of the working people to uphold the economic interests of the masses for a progressive and democratic society. Left unity is central to the working-class political project in India. The political collaboration and cooperation among Left-wing political parties, groups and movements based on common objectives and shared values are crucial to achieve collective political progress and deepening of working-class politics.
Left parties were engaged in internal conflicts, formed alliances without clear direction, prioritized personal differences over ideological positions
There is no doubt that the Left encompasses a diverse range of ideologies and perspectives, the principle of Left unity must encourage setting aside differences and focusing on shared values and goals. The significance of Left unity in fostering social change, addressing common challenges, and promoting a more equitable and just society depends on the collective struggles of the Left parties. The mass movements can overcome the ideological fragmentations by acknowledging the inherent strengths in diversity.
The Left unity challenges existing power structures and promotes dialogue, understanding, and the exchange of ideas. It encourages activists, organizations, and political parties to unite their efforts, pooling their resources, skills, and networks to create a more powerful force for change.
By building bridges rather than walls, Left unity amplifies the collective voice of the Left, making it more effective in challenging existing power structures and advocating for progressive policies. The Left parties and their unity can only mobilise people against all forms of inequality and exploitation in the society by appealing to the wider society.
This wider collaboration enables the Left to create coalitions that span various social, economic, and cultural divides. The united Left can achieve greater influence and electoral success, translating its ideals into tangible policy changes for societal transformation. The Left parties need to amplify the voices and interests of the working people by transcending ideological differences and focusing on shared goals, Left unity can pave the way for significant social, economic, and environmental transformations.
Ultimately, the future of Left-wing politics in India depends on the actions and strategies adopted by the parties involved, the ability to connect with the aspirations and concerns of the people, and the capacity to effectively navigate the changing political landscape. Left unity can provide foundations for progressive social, economic, cultural and environmental transformation by upholding interests of the working people.
Left politics can only shape the future of a formidable mass movement capable of challenging all exploitative structures to create peaceful and egalitarian society. The forward march of the Left unity is not only the starting point but also the only available alternative to defeat the twin dangers of Hindutva fascism and capitalism in India.
---
*University of Glasgow, UK

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.