Skip to main content

More like men, 'queen bee' women endorse, legitimise current gender hierarchy

By Harasankar Adhikari* 

Women’s participation in labour market is significant because they are gradually succeeding in placing themselves in male dominated work settings. Unfortunately, they are not victims of male discrimination. They have to struggle regularly against male’s dominance and gender injustice. But is it always true?
Several studies show that women used to criticise the professional involvement, leadership skills, and assertiveness of their female colleagues. According to Naomi Ellemers (2004), "stereotyping of women rather than differential work commitment emerges as a plausible reason that women have more difficulty than men to be successful in an academic career, and – because of their own precarious position – women are more likely than men to engage in gender stereotyping in this context." It is due to the so-called "Queen Bee Syndrome".
The term, Queen Bee Syndrome was first introduced by G Staines, C Tavris, and TE Jayaratne in 1973. The women considered "Queen Bees" are in high positions professionally in man-dominated organisations, and they use to distance themselves from other women. They show their gender stereotyping behaviours in their gestures and posture.
Thus, the Queen Bee Syndrome is "a phenomenon that leads to gender discrimination in the workplace and is an inseparable attribute of successful women." Further, "the Queen Bee is commonly constructed as a bitch who stings other women if her power is threatened, and, as a concept, the Queen Bee blames individual women for not supporting other women."
We see that stereotypical women are harmful to the reputations of other women. But they do mistakenly think that it perceives “as more convincing and credible than the opinion of men... In fact, the unequal treatment of women due to their gender provides a strong foundation for legitimising the disadvantages of women in the workplace. A successful woman becoming a queen bee during the development of her career may hinder the promotion of women who are their subordinates.”
It influences a fairly clear image of women seeking to mutually exclude rivals within their own sex. Research also indicates that “it is very often the case that women compete more with each other than with men. This is more noticeable because women know women, they also know women’s weaknesses and are able to use these against them.”
Thus, “the reason for the discrimination of women by women is a whole range of negative ‘female’ features.” It has also been studied that no man can be as vile, cruel, and mean as a woman to a woman – also at work. One of the reasons may be simple jealousy, envy, a sense of competition, or the fact that a woman threatens women more than a man.
From a stereotypical point of view, the Queen Bee Syndrome is because queen bee bullies subordinate and obstruct other women’s career advancement. They are seen as selfish, insensitive, and power hungry. If a senior woman leader has a reputation as a queen bee, women in less senior positions often are advised to avoid working with her. This behaviour is "a response to a social identity threat."
Women who are poorly identified with the female gender in the workplace and who are at the same time striving to achieve professional success are exhibiting such behaviour. Consequently, sexual discrimination motivates some women, who are highly identified as female, ‘to take action to eliminate discriminatory practises in the workplace.
It strives for their individual chances of achieving professional success. It is a relational aggression that creates rumours around victims for rejection by the rest of the group. In summary, "derogatory ’queen bee’ label is given to women who pursue individual success in male-dominated work settings (organisations in which men hold most executive positions) by adjusting to the masculine culture and by distancing themselves from other women".
The queen bee women are “becoming more like men, emphasising how they are different from other women, and endorsing and legitimising the current gender hierarchy.” It separates one woman from another. Especially, older women have a separate identity from younger women as she is “more ambitious, much more agentic, and willing to sacrifice for their career.”
This type of woman is most harmful because of their personal achievements in men dominated organisations; they endorse and legitimise gender inequality. They criticise “younger women, as well as strongly supporting the stereotypical perception of women as less ambitious and less engaged in work than men, while emphasising at the same time that they themselves are different from this group of women.”
These queen bees “are less in favour of a policy wanting to take affirmative action, striving to equalise opportunities for younger women’s development and a career advancement, and are less likely to be mentors for their female subordinates.”
It has been seen that “the woman acting like a queen bee may succeed in organisations dominated by men, but she definitely will not be supported in being an effective leader by the younger women who are her subordinates.” It has also been studied that ‘queen bees who maintain gender stereotypes about their subordinates can have a significant impact on the careers of other women.
Their stereotypical assessments are less often perceived as sexist, and thus appear to be more reliable than men’s stereotypical opinions of women, which leads to the creation of a "bad (and often false) image" of younger women in the workplace. The behaviour of queen bees can also destroy the self-confidence of younger women, and thus negatively affect their chances of success. It is a tactical mechanism for “women’s success or promotion at work.”
The trajectory of the development of women’s situation at work plays an important role instead of their “education and real competences as women, their personality traits, and their aspirations.” The situation of women at work depends on other contexts related to culture and identity, which are typically contemporary and constructed based on the body and sexuality.
So, the movement against male discrimination and gender injustice is not enough to bring gender equity. Women should come out of their queen bee syndrome because individual success is not enough for gender justice.



'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Don't agree on domestic subsidies, ensure food security at WTO meet: Farmer leaders

Counterview Desk  The Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements (ICCFM), a top network of farmers’ organizations in India, in a letter to Piyush Goyal, Minister of Commerce and Industry, has asked him to “safeguard food security and sovereignty, even as ensuring peasants' rights" at the 13th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO MC 13), to take place from 26 to 29 February 2024 in Abu Dhabi.

Sharp 61-85% fall in Tech startup funding in India's top 'business-friendly' States

By Rajiv Shah Funding in Tech startups in top business-friendly Indian states has witnessed a major fall, a data intelligence platform for private market research has said in a series of reports it has released this month. Analysing Tech startup data of Telangana, Maharashtra, Delhi NCR, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala, Tracxn Technologies Ltd , the Bengaluru-based research firm, finds that except for Kerala, funding witnessed a fall of anywhere between 61% and 85%.

Students, lawyers, professors detained in Delhi for demonstrating in support of farmers

By Our Representative  About 25 protestors, belonging to the civil rights network, Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a coalition of over 40 organisations, were detained at Jantar Mantar for holding a demonstration in support of the farmers' stir on Friday. Those detained included students, lawyers and professors, including Prof Nandita Narain and Prof N Sachin. 

Maize, bajra, jute, banana cultivation banned off West Bengal border: Plea to NHRC

Counterview Desk  West Bengal-based human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Manch, and is national convenor of the Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity, in a representation to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission, second within few days, has bought to light one more case of trespassing and destruction of a fertile banana plantation by BSF personnel along the Indo-Bangladesh border, stating, despite a written complaint to the police has taken "no initiative".

Solar energy funding dips 9% in 2023; 2024 'kicks off' with US$1 billion investment

By Lakshmitha Raj*  Solar energy tech companies have already secured slightly over US$1 billion in funding in 2024 (till Feb 7, 2024) after total funding into Solar Energy companies in India fell 9% to US$1.55B in 2023 from US$1.7B in 2022. A total of 39 $100M+ rounds have been closed till date, with Delhi leading the city-wise funding, followed by Gurugram and Mumbai.

India second best place to invest, next to UAE, yet there is 'lacks support' for IT services

By Sreevas Sahasranamam, Aileen Ionescu-Somers*  The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the best place in the world to start a new business, according to the latest annual Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey. The Arab nation is number one for the third year in a row thanks to a big push by the government into cutting-edge technology in its efforts to diversify away from oil.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Mahanadi delta: Aggressive construction in flood plains, reduced fish stock, pollution

By Sudhansu R Das  Frequent natural calamities, unemployment, low farmers’ income, increase in crime rate and lack of quality human resources to strike a balance between growth and environment etc. continue to haunt the state. The state should delve into the root causes of poverty, unemployment and natural calamities.