Skip to main content

More like men, 'queen bee' women endorse, legitimise current gender hierarchy

By Harasankar Adhikari* 

Women’s participation in labour market is significant because they are gradually succeeding in placing themselves in male dominated work settings. Unfortunately, they are not victims of male discrimination. They have to struggle regularly against male’s dominance and gender injustice. But is it always true?
Several studies show that women used to criticise the professional involvement, leadership skills, and assertiveness of their female colleagues. According to Naomi Ellemers (2004), "stereotyping of women rather than differential work commitment emerges as a plausible reason that women have more difficulty than men to be successful in an academic career, and – because of their own precarious position – women are more likely than men to engage in gender stereotyping in this context." It is due to the so-called "Queen Bee Syndrome".
The term, Queen Bee Syndrome was first introduced by G Staines, C Tavris, and TE Jayaratne in 1973. The women considered "Queen Bees" are in high positions professionally in man-dominated organisations, and they use to distance themselves from other women. They show their gender stereotyping behaviours in their gestures and posture.
Thus, the Queen Bee Syndrome is "a phenomenon that leads to gender discrimination in the workplace and is an inseparable attribute of successful women." Further, "the Queen Bee is commonly constructed as a bitch who stings other women if her power is threatened, and, as a concept, the Queen Bee blames individual women for not supporting other women."
We see that stereotypical women are harmful to the reputations of other women. But they do mistakenly think that it perceives “as more convincing and credible than the opinion of men... In fact, the unequal treatment of women due to their gender provides a strong foundation for legitimising the disadvantages of women in the workplace. A successful woman becoming a queen bee during the development of her career may hinder the promotion of women who are their subordinates.”
It influences a fairly clear image of women seeking to mutually exclude rivals within their own sex. Research also indicates that “it is very often the case that women compete more with each other than with men. This is more noticeable because women know women, they also know women’s weaknesses and are able to use these against them.”
Thus, “the reason for the discrimination of women by women is a whole range of negative ‘female’ features.” It has also been studied that no man can be as vile, cruel, and mean as a woman to a woman – also at work. One of the reasons may be simple jealousy, envy, a sense of competition, or the fact that a woman threatens women more than a man.
From a stereotypical point of view, the Queen Bee Syndrome is because queen bee bullies subordinate and obstruct other women’s career advancement. They are seen as selfish, insensitive, and power hungry. If a senior woman leader has a reputation as a queen bee, women in less senior positions often are advised to avoid working with her. This behaviour is "a response to a social identity threat."
Women who are poorly identified with the female gender in the workplace and who are at the same time striving to achieve professional success are exhibiting such behaviour. Consequently, sexual discrimination motivates some women, who are highly identified as female, ‘to take action to eliminate discriminatory practises in the workplace.
It strives for their individual chances of achieving professional success. It is a relational aggression that creates rumours around victims for rejection by the rest of the group. In summary, "derogatory ’queen bee’ label is given to women who pursue individual success in male-dominated work settings (organisations in which men hold most executive positions) by adjusting to the masculine culture and by distancing themselves from other women".
The queen bee women are “becoming more like men, emphasising how they are different from other women, and endorsing and legitimising the current gender hierarchy.” It separates one woman from another. Especially, older women have a separate identity from younger women as she is “more ambitious, much more agentic, and willing to sacrifice for their career.”
This type of woman is most harmful because of their personal achievements in men dominated organisations; they endorse and legitimise gender inequality. They criticise “younger women, as well as strongly supporting the stereotypical perception of women as less ambitious and less engaged in work than men, while emphasising at the same time that they themselves are different from this group of women.”
These queen bees “are less in favour of a policy wanting to take affirmative action, striving to equalise opportunities for younger women’s development and a career advancement, and are less likely to be mentors for their female subordinates.”
It has been seen that “the woman acting like a queen bee may succeed in organisations dominated by men, but she definitely will not be supported in being an effective leader by the younger women who are her subordinates.” It has also been studied that ‘queen bees who maintain gender stereotypes about their subordinates can have a significant impact on the careers of other women.
Their stereotypical assessments are less often perceived as sexist, and thus appear to be more reliable than men’s stereotypical opinions of women, which leads to the creation of a "bad (and often false) image" of younger women in the workplace. The behaviour of queen bees can also destroy the self-confidence of younger women, and thus negatively affect their chances of success. It is a tactical mechanism for “women’s success or promotion at work.”
The trajectory of the development of women’s situation at work plays an important role instead of their “education and real competences as women, their personality traits, and their aspirations.” The situation of women at work depends on other contexts related to culture and identity, which are typically contemporary and constructed based on the body and sexuality.
So, the movement against male discrimination and gender injustice is not enough to bring gender equity. Women should come out of their queen bee syndrome because individual success is not enough for gender justice.



'Enough evidence' in Indian tradition to support legal basis for same-sex marriage

By Iyce Malhotra, Joseph Mathai, Sandeep Chachra*  The ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage provides space for much-needed conversations on issues that have hitherto remained “invisible” or engaged with patriarchal locker room humour. We must recognize that people with diverse sexualities and complex gender identities have faced discrimination, stigma and decades of oppression. Their issues have mainly remained buried in dominant social discourse, and many view them with deep insecurities.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Victim of communal violence, Christians in Manipur want Church leadership to speak up

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The first eleven days of May 2023 have, in many ways, been a defining period of Indian history! Plenty has happened in a rapid-fire stream of events. Ironically, each one of them are indicators of how crimes and the criminalisation of society has become the ‘new norm’; these include, the May Day rallies with a focus on the four labour codes which are patently against the rights of workers; the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report on 1 May stating that conditions for religious freedom in India “continued to worsen in 2022”; the continued protest by the Indian women wrestlers at Jantar Mantar for the expulsion of the chief of the Indian Wrestlers Federation on very serious allegations; the Elections in Karnataka on 10 May (with communalism and corruption as the mainstay); the release of the fake, derogative and insensitive film ‘The Kerala Story’; the release of World Free Press Index on 3 May which places India

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Delhi HC rules in favour of retired Air Force officer 'overcharged' for Covid treatment

By Rosamma Thomas*  In a decision of May 22, 2023, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of petitioner Group Captain Suresh Khanna who was under treatment at CK Birla Hospital, Gurugram, between April 28 and May 5, 2021, for a period of eight days, for Covid-19 pneumonia. The petitioner had to pay Rs 3,55,286 as treatment costs, but the Ex-Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) only reimbursed him for Rs 1,83,748, on the basis of government-approved rates. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

India joining US sponsored trade pillar to hurt Indian farmers, 'promote' GM seeds, food

Counterview Desk  As many as 32 civil society organisations (CSOs), in a letter to Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and India joining the trade pillar, have said that its provisions will allow the US to ensure a more favourable regulatory regime “for enhancing its exports of genetically modified (GM) seeds and GM food”, underlining, it will “significantly hurt the livelihoods of Indian farmers.”

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Undermining law, breastfeeding? Businesses 'using' celebrities to promote baby food

By Rajiv Shah  A report prepared by the top child welfare NGO, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI), has identified as many as 15 offenders allegedly violating the Indian baby food law, the Infant Milk Substitutes Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act 1992, and Amendment Act 2003 (IMS Act), stating, compliance with the law “seems to be dwindling by the day.”