Expectation from Modi on rooting out corruption has not been met adequately

By NS Venkataraman*
Whatever the sworn critics of Mr. Narendra Modi , India’s Prime Minister, may say about his administration, the ground reality is that the cross section of Indians living across the country and observers abroad are of the view that India has changed for better in multiple directions during the last nine years after Mr. Modi has taken over as Prime Minister. Many international expert groups as well as UNO have now applauded India for it’s strong economic growth trajectory, even as several countries in the world are facing recessionary trends.
Several opinion survey carried out in recent time have clearly revealed that Mr. Modi is the most popular and charismatic leader in India and none of the leaders belonging to opposition political parties in India can match Mr. Modi with regard to his standing . Even some global agencies have hailed Mr. Modi as a very important and popular world leader.
In such circumstances., the result of the recent election in Karnataka state in India where Mr. Modi’s party has not been able to retain it’s power and lost to the opposition party, has come as a bolt from the blue.
There is now feverish debate across India as to why this has happened. While the sworn critics of Mr. Modi say that this Karnataka election verdict indicate the beginning of the end of Mr. Modi’s leadership, most discerning observers dismiss this view. One credible view is that the BJP party, which was in power in Karnataka , has not given the quality of governance that is expected of it and perhaps, there have been several incidents of corruption in the government machinery , which has disappointed the people of Karnataka. People must have been particularly disappointed , since ultimate leader of BJP is Mr. Modi.
When Mr. Modi was voted as Prime Minister of India nine years back, people recognised him as a strong and committed political leader with courage of conviction and high standard of personal integrity. Of course, people expected that Mr. Modi would launch and implement several development projects in Industrial, commercial and social sector and he has done this and people are satisfied about this. At the same time, people certainly expected that Mr. Modi would totally eradicate corruption in the country at every level.
The ground reality is that the expectation on rooting out corruption in the country has not been met adequately, inspite of Mr. Modi being the Prime Minister. Certainly, the central government under the direct administration of Mr. Modi remains corruption free and transparent but this is not so in the case of the several state governments. Still, people think that it is Mr. Modi’s responsibility to eliminate corruption even in state level, as he is a national leader with strong mandate.
With just around 12 months before the next parliamentary election, Mr. Modi has little time to lose in meeting the expectations of the people about eradicating corruption. While development projects are moving on well and the climate of growth has been steadily built up in the country which is likely to be sustained, the one point agenda for Mr. Modi in the coming twelve months should be his determined crusade against corruption. Of course, the anti corruption steps will be resisted and motives would be attributed . But, Mr. Modi has to move on and catch and punish the corrupt forces in all possible ways, that would give confidence to the people that corruption would be eliminated soon.
In the coming parliamentary election, Mr. Modi will be tested based on his success in the anti corruption drive.
Many Indians seem to think that the root cause for political corruption and consequent administrative corruption in the country is that almost all political parties in India , other than BJP and Communist / Marxist party, are family controlled and have vested interests. Such family control of political parties is viewed with disgust by the people. Perhaps, the pre condition to eliminate corruption is that the family control of political parties and consequent development of vested interests should be wiped out.
As a part of Mr. Modi’s anti corruption crusade, Mr. Modi should also launch a strong movement , criticising the dynasty politics in India. He needs to speak very strongly about this, which will be received well by the people and it would catch their imagination.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India.

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra* The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.”

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey* The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway.

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum* 105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi* In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded reaction in the form of a link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson".

Search This Blog