Skip to main content

Expectation from Modi on rooting out corruption has not been met adequately

By NS Venkataraman* 

Whatever the sworn critics of Mr. Narendra Modi , India’s Prime Minister, may say about his administration, the ground reality is that the cross section of Indians living across the country and observers abroad are of the view that India has changed for better in multiple directions during the last nine years after Mr. Modi has taken over as Prime Minister. Many international expert groups as well as UNO have now applauded India for it’s strong economic growth trajectory, even as several countries in the world are facing recessionary trends.
Several opinion survey carried out in recent time have clearly revealed that Mr. Modi is the most popular and charismatic leader in India and none of the leaders belonging to opposition political parties in India can match Mr. Modi with regard to his standing . Even some global agencies have hailed Mr. Modi as a very important and popular world leader.
In such circumstances., the result of the recent election in Karnataka state in India where Mr. Modi’s party has not been able to retain it’s power and lost to the opposition party, has come as a bolt from the blue.
There is now feverish debate across India as to why this has happened. While the sworn critics of Mr. Modi say that this Karnataka election verdict indicate the beginning of the end of Mr. Modi’s leadership, most discerning observers dismiss this view. One credible view is that the BJP party, which was in power in Karnataka , has not given the quality of governance that is expected of it and perhaps, there have been several incidents of corruption in the government machinery , which has disappointed the people of Karnataka. People must have been particularly disappointed , since ultimate leader of BJP is Mr. Modi.
When Mr. Modi was voted as Prime Minister of India nine years back, people recognised him as a strong and committed political leader with courage of conviction and high standard of personal integrity. Of course, people expected that Mr. Modi would launch and implement several development projects in Industrial, commercial and social sector and he has done this and people are satisfied about this. At the same time, people certainly expected that Mr. Modi would totally eradicate corruption in the country at every level.
The ground reality is that the expectation on rooting out corruption in the country has not been met adequately, inspite of Mr. Modi being the Prime Minister. Certainly, the central government under the direct administration of Mr. Modi remains corruption free and transparent but this is not so in the case of the several state governments. Still, people think that it is Mr. Modi’s responsibility to eliminate corruption even in state level, as he is a national leader with strong mandate.
With just around 12 months before the next parliamentary election, Mr. Modi has little time to lose in meeting the expectations of the people about eradicating corruption. While development projects are moving on well and the climate of growth has been steadily built up in the country which is likely to be sustained, the one point agenda for Mr. Modi in the coming twelve months should be his determined crusade against corruption. Of course, the anti corruption steps will be resisted and motives would be attributed . But, Mr. Modi has to move on and catch and punish the corrupt forces in all possible ways, that would give confidence to the people that corruption would be eliminated soon.
In the coming parliamentary election, Mr. Modi will be tested based on his success in the anti corruption drive.
Many Indians seem to think that the root cause for political corruption and consequent administrative corruption in the country is that almost all political parties in India , other than BJP and Communist / Marxist party, are family controlled and have vested interests. Such family control of political parties is viewed with disgust by the people. Perhaps, the pre condition to eliminate corruption is that the family control of political parties and consequent development of vested interests should be wiped out.
As a part of Mr. Modi’s anti corruption crusade, Mr. Modi should also launch a strong movement , criticising the dynasty politics in India. He needs to speak very strongly about this, which will be received well by the people and it would catch their imagination.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Kutch water crisis deepens: Bhuj lost 54 of its 82 lakes; pastoralists migrate first time since 2018

By Rajiv Shah   A comprehensive new report by Homes In The City (HIC), a Bhuj-based civil society programme, has revealed that despite late monsoon rains easing Kutch's immediate drought conditions, the region faces a deepening water security crisis — with Bhuj having lost more than half of its historic lakes and pastoral communities forced to migrate for the first time since 2018.

From a cowshed to a home: How Mangaltai's Palawi gives HIV-positive children a second life

By Dr A.V. Yadappanavar *  In a small village called Takli, not far from the temple town of Pandharpur in Maharashtra, there is a home where children who were once abandoned because of their HIV status now find food, medicine, education, and something even rarer — love without fear. The home is called Palawi, and it was founded in 2001 by Mangal Shah, affectionately known as Mangaltai, a social worker who could not look away from children rejected by their own families.

Tribal rights under siege: Roundtable Seeks strong legal defence of land, jobs and PESA

By A Representative  Tribal rights activists, legal experts, tribal leaders, former officials and civil society representatives from Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have called  for urgent action on tribal land rights, employment and PESA safeguards. They were participating in  roundtable on Constitutional Safeguards for Scheduled Tribes in the Telugu States at the Centre for Economic and Social Studies (CESS), Hyderabad. Former Governor Ch. Vidyasagar Rao chaired the deliberations.