Skip to main content

Exclusive Brahmins township: Of Hindutva, casteism and segregated housing societies

By Sanjana Sree Manusanipalli, Sandeep Pandey* 

The city is supposed to be the place where anyone can be anything they want to be. They say in a city like Hyderabad, there are no feelings of caste, class or religion. Everyone is supposed to be equal. Sociologists have also believed that urbanisation could signal the end of the caste system.
BR Ambedkar encouraged people from marginalised castes to migrate to urban areas. He believed Indian villages perpetuate this system of inequality. Unfortunately, however, cities have their own way of perpetuating these inequalities. Most of us see these instances of inequality every day, participate in them even but never look at them as issues.
These inequalities are all around us, even in our homes. The gated community, which is becoming so popular with the urban middle class, is an excellent example of how city organisation discriminates. The security guards and restricted access serve a dual purpose, one of inclusion and the other of exclusion.
The gated community keeps in those who are wealthy and usually upper caste. In contrast, another community lives around the boundaries serving those within the boundaries. This organisation is justified in the name of security, but the true reason is to keep interactions with those deemed ‘less than’ to a minimum. These are the means used by the well-to-do to segregate themselves.
There are many ways in which these communities make sure that the difference between the residents and the non-residents is known. The ones who come to work within the gates are seen as ‘dirty’ and ‘unaesthetic’. The gated citizens try to avoid seeing them unless absolutely necessary. There are separate elevators and staircases for them to use. This is done in the name of safety.
The residents do not take kindly to this segregation not being followed. Some communities do not allow workers to go from one building to another using the ground floor as the residents do. If they must go around, they must use the basement, where the cars are parked. One can question if the justification for this is safety as well. The workers who need to be seen, such as those who clean the common areas, have to wear a uniform. Perhaps safety is the reason for this as well, while one can question how this keeps anyone safe.
Further, anytime the workers enter or exit the complex, they are checked at the gate. If they have anything extra at the time of exit, they need to show where they got it. If not, they get into trouble. The justification for this humiliation is safety, of course. Additionally, if a resident complains about a worker and wants them to be blacklisted, the community will do so. This is done regardless of the reason, without any enquiry into the matter.
The worker will no longer be allowed to enter the complex and work there. On the other hand any exploitation of the workers, sexual harassment of female workers, withholding their salaries, etc., are hardly ever reported. In most cases workers have to silently suffer all such excesses. Their livelihood and their lives are not seen to be important.
Some of this discriminatory treatment is normalised inside the homes. The residents are okay with the house help cleaning the dining table but not with them sitting and eating with the residents or even without them on the dining table or sofa in the drawing room. The help, while they clean the toilets inside the homes, are not allowed to use them. Usually, these communities have separate toilets for the workers, which, not surprisingly, are located in the basement. Worse, they may have to go out to find a bush or a secluded corner to relieve themselves.
Muslims or Dalits being denied housing in predominantly upper caste localities in probably is an all India phenomenon
There are many ways in which discrimination continues, even in cities. The gated community is just one example of it. It shows a structure similar to that of an Indian village. The privileged live in the centre, and the marginalised live in the periphery. Unfortunately, not much has changed.
With the emergence of Hindutva politics with attendant caste system and its mindset, things have taken a nosedive. Shankara Agraharam, a township of 1,200 residential plots that is coming up at Bagepalli, about 90 km from Bengaluru, has openly advertised that it is for Brahmins.
The brochure of the exclusive township declares that the developers want to ‘bring back the tradition of Brahmins which has ceased to exist in modern India. One can only imagine how the workers, who in all likelihood are going to be from non-Brahmin castes or will be poor Brahmins, will be treated by residents of such a self-declared elite society.
In Gujarat gated communities or housing colonies comprising of only one caste or religious community have existed since long before. Muslims or Dalits being denied housing in predominantly upper caste localities in probably is an all India phenomenon.
Now that Seattle City Council in United States has passed a resolution against caste based discrimination in India American social life and corporate America is prohibiting caste based discrimination in employee behavior, it is time urban India recognized that caste based discrimination is widely practiced in social life and must make amends to get rid of it. More than laws what is required is enlightened behaviour.
It is quite clear that laws are not able to achieve the ideals enshrined in the Constitution. More intermixing of different caste, ethnic, religious communities, especially in religious and social functions, practicing ‘equality’ and ‘fraternity (and sorority)’ guaranteed in the Constitution, encouraging inter-caste, inter-religious, inter-regional marriages, not allowing any kind of discrimination at all are some of the ways in which we can move towards a casteless and discrimination free society.
---
*Sanjana Sree Manusanipalli is a final year LLB student at NALSAR, Hyderabad; Sandeep Pandey, a Magsaysay awardee, is general secretary, Socialist Party (India)

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Edgar Snow's objective view of Chinese revolution 'avoided' uncritical support for Maoism

By Harsh Thakor*  As we commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Chinese Revolution, it is essential to reflect on the legacy of Edgar Snow, the first journalist to enter the northwest region known as Red China in 1936. His groundbreaking work brought the narratives of Mao Zedong and his followers to the global stage. A prominent figure in China, Snow was an American journalist celebrated for his 1937 book , "Red Star Over China."