Skip to main content

Right to health? Govt of India 'coercing' beneficiaries into clutches of private players

By Raghav Agarwal* 

The Covid-19 crisis has laid bare the Indian public health system and brought it to its knees. Visuals of patients and kin desperately searching for bed, life-saving oxygen or critical medical supplies have hogged international headlines. After decades of neglect and underinvestment, the unfolding human tragedy has taken the veil off the problems plaguing India's public health system.
"For a long time since its independence in 1947, public health was neglected and was not viewed as an economically productive expenditure in the country -- unlike investments in manufacturing, services, and agriculture," says Amulya Nidhi, national co-convener of Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (Peoples' Health Movement).
"For many decades, health systems in India have not received the respect and resources they deserve. Central and State public financing of health stagnated around 1-1.5% of GDP, and outof-pocket expenditure (OOPE) on health was increased drastically to over 60% even in recent years," he adds.
India's expenditure on health as percentage of its GDP is much lower than other developing countries and its neighbours such as Brazil (9.2%), South Africa (8.1%), China (5%), Bhutan (2.5%), and Sri Lanka (1.6%).
The Bhore Committee report in 1946 declared in the very beginning of its preamble that 'No individual should fail to secure adequate medical care because of inability to pay for it.' In 1983, India enacted its first National Health Policy (NHP) establishing comprehensive primary health care services to reach the population in the country's remote areas.
However, the policy failed to meet its objective due to its selective applicability based on age, gender, ethnicity, thus preventing access to health care surveillance. NHP – 2002 was an extension to NHP-1983, focusing on public-private partnerships in public health to overcome the government's shortcomings of infrastructural and workforce deficit. 
NHP 2017 builds on the NHP 2002 in the context of progress towards 'Universal Health Coverage.' NHP 2017 stresses that making available good quality, free essential and generic drugs and diagnostics at public health care facilities is the most effective way for achieving the goal.
Ayushman Bharat, a flagship scheme of the Government of India (GoI), was launched in 2018 as recommended by the NHP 2017 to meet Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and its underlining commitment to "leave no one behind." Under the scheme, GoI announced the creation of 1,50,000 Health & Wellness Centres (HWCs).
The second component under Ayushman Bharat is the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojna or PM-JAY as it is popularly known. It provides a cover of Rs. 5 lakhs per family per year for secondary and tertiary care hospitalization across public and private empanelled hospitals in India. Over 10.74 crore poor and vulnerable entitled families (approximately 50 crore beneficiaries) are eligible for these benefits.

Universal Health Care vs Universal Health Coverage

While the pandemic has highlighted the structural weaknesses in India's public health system, those issues have always existed, says Amulya Nidhi. It has allowed the private health sector to grow by leaps and bounds, while the public sector has remained underfunded and underperforming. India's private hospitals are broadly commercialized and profit-driven focused on treating disease.
What makes the matter worse is that most Indians do not have health insurance and pay for health care out of their own pockets. According to the Fitch report, more than 80% of India's population still does not have any significant health insurance coverage, and approximately 68% has limited or no access to essential medicines NHP 2017 has failed to meet its expected goals of delivery, accessibility, and affordability of primary health care and insurance.
This is fundamentally ingrained in the conflict of universal health care vs universal health coverage. The two ideas are interchangeably used. According to World Health Organization, Universal Health Care means that 'all' individuals and communities receive the health services they need 'without suffering financial hardship or discriminating based on economic, social, cultural, ethnic, religious strata or gender .' 
Amulya Nidhi and Jan Swasthya Abhiyan underscore that there is a rudimentary difference between 'care' and 'coverage.' Universal Health Care provides 'Right to Health' for 'all'. In contrast, Universal Health Coverage offers benefits only to a specific population segment while depriving the majority others of the benefits. 
Amulya Nidhi
As per the RTI filed by Vivek Pandey, only 605,308 citizens could avail the benefits of PM-JAY scheme for Covid19 treatment up to first week of June 2021, with about 5 lakh beneficiaries belonging to only three states (Karnataka, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh). Further, only about 20,000 HWCs have been constructed to date.
This underscores the diabolical side of Universal Health Coverage, which only provides partial health services while coercing the beneficiaries into the clutches of private players to receive complete treatment. Under the pretext of Universal Health Care and lack of incentives for the government to invest in public health, NHP 2017 has accelerated the transformation (or degeneration) of public health services into an oligopolistic profiteering health industry.
It took just about 15 months and two waves of Covid-19 to expose the debauchery of the current National Public Health System and its over-reliance on private health services. "The fundamental issue remains that the commercially-driven private hospital system does not look to provide long-term ongoing care to people with the aim of preventing and controlling disease", says Amulya Nidhi.
Data from the National Sample Survey (2017-18) shows that out-of-pocket expenditure in private hospitals is almost six times that in public hospitals for inpatient care and two or three times higher for outpatient care. "A policy shift in purchasing of care from private providers is thus more likely to lead to increasing levels of health inequity and exclusion of the poor and marginalized from essential health services," he adds.
It is worth noting that even during the pandemic, private players resorted to immoral profiteering by overcharging human desperation for beds, and denying admission to those who could not meet the exorbitant costs of treatment.

Decentralised healthcare

The pandemic has relayed the focus back on the importance of public health services. Mumbai was at the epicenter of the second Covid-19 wave, with daily positive cases elapsing 10,000. The State government ramped up the free Covid-19 beds in the city to about 20,000+ in less than a month, with 80% beds in public hospitals and makeshift Covid jumbo centres.
Ramawatar Agarwal, age 63 years, was a co-morbid Covid-19 patient. Despite spending Rs 50,000 to book a bed at Mumbai's Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, he was not administered any medicines, temperature or oximeter checks, or even provided drinking water for about eight hours from the time he entered the hospital. Worried about his well-being, he quickly shifted to a Mumbai Municipal Corporation-run Seven Hills Hospital. In about seven days, he cheated death and returned home without spending a penny.
Amulya Nidhi and Jan Swasthya Abhiyan believe that there is an urgent need to promote the decentralization of health care and build integrated, comprehensive, and participatory health care approaches that place "Peoples Health in Peoples Hands". They seek to make the private players more accountable, with greater government regulation and standardization of health services.
The care of public health is the first duty of the State. It should be our unflinching goal to reclaim our right to well-being and to establish the Right to Health and Health Care as Basic Human Rights inscribed in the constitution.
---
*PGP 2020-22 Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Bangalore

Comments

Unknown said…
A very knowledgeable article and we need more health activist like Amulya Nidhi who is fighting tirelessly for protecting the Health Rights of the citizens.
jason said…
If more money goes to a govt system which is unaccountable due to a broken judiciary, for even the loftiest of aims, as desired by these dreamers, how will it actually make any positive impact. We will just have more evil thru powerful and authoritarian men like the present prime minister has made of khansi jukaam

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Maize, bajra, jute, banana cultivation banned off West Bengal border: Plea to NHRC

Counterview Desk  West Bengal-based human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Manch, and is national convenor of the Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity, in a representation to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission, second within few days, has bought to light one more case of trespassing and destruction of a fertile banana plantation by BSF personnel along the Indo-Bangladesh border, stating, despite a written complaint to the police has taken "no initiative".

India second best place to invest, next to UAE, yet there is 'lacks support' for IT services

By Sreevas Sahasranamam, Aileen Ionescu-Somers*  The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the best place in the world to start a new business, according to the latest annual Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey. The Arab nation is number one for the third year in a row thanks to a big push by the government into cutting-edge technology in its efforts to diversify away from oil.

Living standards in 'model' Gujarat worse than major states: Govt of India document

By Rajiv Shah  Amidst raging controversy over whether the latest Government of India’s “Household Consumption Expenditure Survey 2022-23 Fact Sheet: August 2022-July 2023” suggests that India’s poverty levels are actually down to 4.5 to 5%  during the decade-long Narendra Modi rule, a state-wise breakup in the 27-page document shows that “model” Gujarat’s average consumption expenditure is far below most of the so-called developed states.

Not livable in summer, Chitrakut PM-Awas houses 'push' tribals in moneylender trap

By Bharat Dogra*  Those who are in-charge of implementing the PM-Awas scheme of rural housing can rightly take pride in what has been achieved in Dafai hamlet (Karvi block, Chitrakut district, Uttar Pradesh). All the Kol tribal families here are extremely poor and vulnerable. In a rare achievement, almost all of them have received housing assistance under PM Awas. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Mahanadi delta: Aggressive construction in flood plains, reduced fish stock, pollution

By Sudhansu R Das  Frequent natural calamities, unemployment, low farmers’ income, increase in crime rate and lack of quality human resources to strike a balance between growth and environment etc. continue to haunt the state. The state should delve into the root causes of poverty, unemployment and natural calamities.

Development? This tribal hamlet in Chitrakut has no toilets, no electricity connections yet

By Bharat Dogra*  As we moved away from the starting point of the Bundelkhand Expressway and a famous pilgrimage site into a side-road, the hills of Chitrakut here appeared to be more and more isolated. Another turn, and we appeared to have reached almost a dead-end. However it is here that over 80 households of the Kol tribal community have been living for a long time.

Narmada Valley's fossil evidence: Ground for 'nationalists' to argue primates' India roots?

By Saurav Sarkar*  In December 1982, a geologist digging in India’s Central Narmada Valley found something he did not expect. Arun Sonakia, who at the time worked for the Geological Survey of India, unearthed a hominid fossil skullcap from the Pleistocene era. The discovery sent shockwaves through the field of paleoanthropology and put South Asia on the map of human prehistory. Some experts concluded that the skull likely belonged to a member of a predecessor species of ours, Homo heidelbergensis , or perhaps was a hybrid of homo species, while Sonakia himself suggested “ an affinity… to Homo erectus .”