Skip to main content

Shaheen Bagh 'verdict': Public space and public realm in the light of peoples’ protest

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*
The Supreme Court on February 17, 2020, while hearing a plea against Shaheen Bagh road blockade, made an interesting observation cum interrogation saying that democracy works on expression of views but there are lines and boundaries and that people (protesters) cannot block public road indefinitely and create inconvenience for others; further adding that the "question is where can they demonstrate" .
Some days ago, the apex court had said that protest must be done in an area identified for agitations and cannot be done on a public road or park. As an architect-urban designer-planner (and as a citizen if I may wish to protest), I’m keen to know where are such public spaces in our cities especially at the neighborhood levels for people to protest if the public roads and/or parks are excluded from the definition of the public realms?
Keeping the Apex Court’s discretion to neglect the purpose of the protest out of the discussion here, I like to draw the attention of the court, the police and the local urban development authorities to the very idea of Public Space and Public Realm in the light of Peoples’ Protest in Planned Cities/ Towns of India.
City level public spaces like Azad Maidan of Mumbai, Dharna Chowk of Hyderabad, Park Circus Maidan of Kolkata, Ghanta Ghar Chowk of Lucknow, Ramlila Maidan of Delhi, etc. are extremely important and have been used for various events including protests from time to time. However, for prolonged public gatherings like the one at Shaheen Bagh and the alike across the country, the nature of public space is very much now and here thing and thus requires neighborhood level public spaces for peoples’ gatherings.
It is important to acknowledge and accept that our towns and cities are insufficiently provided with the public spaces and public realms for peoples’ expressions of all kinds. It is important that we appreciate the multiplicity of functions of the public spaces particularly if they transcend the uses more by the peoples than by the automobiles.
UNESCO defines a public space as an area/ place that is open and accessible to all peoples, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, age or socio-economic level. These are public gathering spaces such as plazas, squares and parks as well as connecting spaces such as sidewalks and streets.
The ‘everyday spaces’ that are used by people to socialize, play, work, shop, traverse and use for activities such as exercise, enable social processes among the local and other people. The publicness of the spaces called the public realm is the physical manifestation of community interaction is at the core of making of cities.
A city requires a hierarchy of public space system from cluster to community to neighborhood to city and to regional level public spaces. The URDPFI (Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation) Guidelines of the Ministry of Urban Development of the Government of India (2014) declares that 10-12 square meters of open space per person is desirable in the cities.
The hierarchy for organised open spaces shall include parks, play fields and other spaces like specified park, amusement park, maidan, multipurpose open space, botanical garden and zoological parks, traffic parks etc. The guidelines suggest 3-4 local parks and playgrounds at housing cluster level and neighbourhood levels besides 2-3 community level park and open spaces.
The guidelines also suggest that 0.50 hectare of open space be provided in every 5,000 population of housing park; 1.00 hectare of open space be provided in every 15,000 population of neighbourhood park; and 5.00 hectares of open space be provided in every 1 lakh population of community park.
While the guidelines talk about the open spaces to be spatially distributed and multiple function in time to be promoted, it broadly touches upon the definition and function of open spaces merely for recreation. Somehow the idea of multi-functionality of public spaces is blurred in the policy and its manifestation can be seen affecting the peoples’ perception of public realm.
In other words, if a public space is continuously occupied by automobiles or encroachments, it must be seen in the same light of inconvenience as the protest is being seen. Also, if the public spaces like parks and playgrounds are not allowed for people to congregate for protest, then it is a discriminatory outlook on the purpose of use of the public spaces. A public space is as much for play, party and parking as it is for protest. This needs to be accepted by the people and the political establishments with the same logic.
The publicness of the spaces called the public realm is the physical manifestation of community interaction is at the core of making of cities
We the People of India request the Supreme Court that the available public spaces cannot be stereotyped with the types of usage, and that the public realm must be respected for multiplicity of expression of both celebration as well as concern.
And if the apex court is directing people to protest in areas identified for agitations, the directive must be taken seriously by the local urban development authorities and architects/ planners for the lack of provision of such spaces at the housing/ neighborhood/ community levels. It is no exaggeration that planning of the cities have happened using populations gross number rather than the peoples’ gamut of needs.
The city planning has not catered to the set guidelines of the public spaces at housing/neighborhood/ community levels and obviously the aggregate level of public space provisions in the cities need to be relooked especially if the function of the public spaces need to be limited to or barred from certain type of activities.
Having one or two large or dedicated public spaces for political expressions isn’t enough in large cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Lucknow, etc. Then several of the public spaces in the cities get used as parking lots. The apex court must also consider them to be a matter of inconvenience. Several of the parks and playground are waiting upgradation causing more inconvenience to the needs of the local people.
Further, if the playgrounds, parks, riverfronts, other social-cultural spaces are for recreation only, then wonder where do people express resistance. And then if they are not allowed to be used for protest, the people are pushed to be on the roads to protest. Not to forget that roads are the first order public spaces.
We shall remind ourselves that people are standing on the pan-chai shops at every nook and corner of the cities and spending hours there. Isn’t that causing problems to commute? Then there are official and unofficial encroachments in the public realms. They too cause a lot of problems to commute. The apex court may like to take note of them too as cause of roadblocks.
Should we like to move from the governmental approach to the governance approach where local  peoples’ needs are met with, the neighborhood public spaces as mediums/ manifestations of public realms and activities like the Shaheen Bagh challenge the local urban development authorities, police, architects and planners to rethink about the planning and designing of cities in particular the provision, the distribution, the design and the maintenance of the public spaces at housing/ neighborhood/ community and city levels.
And if the Supreme Court is not coming out strong on the increasing number of automobiles on the roads and the parking lots that continue to cause inconvenience to the pedestrians, it is unfortunately showing either bias about looking at the public spaces and the public realms or is ignorant of these facts of planning, designing and building of cities and public spaces.
It is important that the honorable Supreme Court takes note that public spaces are meant to be multi-functional and are equally eligible for expressing concerns as for celebrations. Further, making the public space provision discriminative in nature may tarnish the very public realm of the society which the court has agreed upon in principle that people have the right to protest.
So, the matter ‘where to protest?’ is more a provision problem and such spaces are to be ensured by the local development authority and the local police must be taking responsibility to ensure safety of the people in the designated public spaces.
Pedestrians have the first right on the public spaces and since protesters fall in the pedestrian category, they are simply exercising the right to be in the public realm to engage in social-cultural-political interactions and activities.
If the people are reclaiming the public spaces from the automobiles, it is philosophically to be considered cities are reclaimed by the people from the mechanization. A reason certainly worth celebrating in terms of public spaces, public realms and people. At least this is what we learn and teach at architecture, urban design and planning disciplines that cities are for people and public spaces including the roads are to be pedestrianized to its most possible level.
On February 22, as has been reported, the roadblock at Shaheen Bagh is now relieved. The roadblock and smooth traffic flow are overrated by the petitioner, and unfortunately endorsed by the Supreme Court. In this analogy, then all political campaigns on the roadsides, all festivals on the roadsides, all processions, all cricket matches create roadblocks and create hindrance to the traffic flow.
For that matter, with every important minister passing by, the roads are blocked every now and then. If Shaheen Bagh is happening, the local police and the local urban development authorities can rework on the local transportation plan as they do in the other events and in the continuously happening road construction activities in various parts of the cities.
The women of Shaheen Bagh and other places in the country are sitting for constructive matters of the country’s conscience and therefore their concerns need to be heard with the same rigor as the petitions of the roadblock is heard and judged by the apex court. Also, because the petitioners are mostly men and the protesters are presumably mostly women, it is unfair to suppress the expression of the latter in a democracy in true spirit.
The apex court needs to go past the gender bias in asserting the use of public space by ‘x’ peoples as in case of the current protests being dominated by women such as at Shaheen Bagh.
Protest, in true sense, is becoming a manifestation of reclamation of the public spaces by the people, for the people, of the people
When every nook and corner of the roads and streets in India are occupied by pan and chai walas that are mostly flocked by the men for hours every day which are also important reasons to create inconvenience to the locality in terms of not only traffic but in terms of littering and trolling/ teasing the girls/ women passersby. The apex court is yet to go strong on stopping of the pan/ chai shops and flocking of men around them creating a lot of inconvenience to the women of the cities.
In the end, I request the Supreme Court to acknowledge and appreciate the reclamation of public space by the people more than by the automobiles. I also request the apex court to take out time to hear the peoples voices who sat through the scorching cold and now the heat, especially if the apex court could hear the sirens/ horns of the people sitting in the cars and having some inconvenience to commute.
Protest, in true sense, is becoming a manifestation of reclamation of the public spaces by the people, for the people, of the people. I’ve a simple question to the Supreme Court to conclude:
“If in an city like Ahmedabad that has18x2 Kilometers of public space in the form of Sabarmati River(Lake)front, yet few people who wish to protest do not get a space there to do so and then they have no choice than to sit on protest in a private (Ajith) Mill compound in Rakhiyal or the roadside of IIM Ahemdabad or Gandhi Ashram, with great pain I want to why can’t people use that huge public space made with that huge cost? Is that only for seeing and not using? Is that only for the Ministers/ Elites to use?”
I urge the Supreme Court to take cognizance of the fact that politicians with unsecular and unconstitutional ideologies are blocking the growth of the country and that is more important to be addressed by the court than a few hundred meters of roadblock in a thousands of kilometers of roads in the city of Delhi. So please be the Court We the People Know you for and Trust you for.
---
*Entrepreneur, researcher, educator and a close political observer; interested in learning and sharing about the sustainability and livability of the built environment

Comments

The best writeup I have read on the space dynamics of protest at Shaheen Bagh so far. Very meticulously, you've analysed point by point, the rationale of reclamining public space for dissent to mainstream the culture and reason of protest.

TRENDING

North Gujarat gram panchayat bars villagers from dealing with Muslim hawkers, traders

By Our Representative  A gram panchayat in North Gujarat has barred its residents not to buy anything from Muslim traders and hawkers. An order of the Waghasan group gram panchayat of Tharad taluka of Banaskantha district dated June 30 states that the decision has been taken in the wake of beheading of a Hindu tailor after he posted a derogatory writeup on Prophet Mohammad in Udaipur. The gram panchayat resolution says, anyone seen buying or selling any commodity from a Muslim hawker or trader would be fined Rs 5,100. Bringing this to light, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, in a letter to Gujarat chief minister Bhupendra Patel, says, the state government should take legal action against the panchayat chief who has signed the “unjust” order. The letter says, the act of the sarpanch and other signatories is a violation of rule of law of the state and threat to peace, pointing out, the move is in violation of Article 15 of the Constitution, which says that none

Unlike Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India: Ukrainian scholar tells 'Indian friends'

Counterview Desk In an open letter to "dear Indian friends", Anastasia Piliavsky, born in Odessa, Ukraine, studied at Boston and Oxford Universities (on a Rhodes Scholarship), and now teaches at King’s College, London, has said that she faces "deep moral dilemma", personally and professionally, over the "astonishingly unified Indian response to the war in Ukraine." Based on her interaction with a "number of thoughtful and caring Indian friends", in this letter, she says, she is "reeling at the ubiquitous silence at, justifications of or outright support for Putin’s terror, which now prevails in India, at the ubiquitous #IStandWithPutin and #istandwithrussia hashtags." She insists, India must understand, "Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India. Soviet leaders, beginning with (the Ukrainian) Nikita Khrushchev – who declared hindi rusi bhai bhai – built up deep political and cultural exchange with India." Text : I

Technocratic globalism, tyranny? Health Ministry warned: bill to 'enslave' Indians

Sandeep Pandey, Tushar Gandhi By Rosamma Thomas*  Union of Concerned Citizens, a group comprising Magsaysay Award winner Prof Sandeep Pandey, human rights activist Tushar Gandhi, former judge of the Bombay High Court BG Kolse Patil, pediatrician Dr Jacob Puliyel and several renowned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister cautioning him against tabling the draft Public Health Bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. “The Public Health (Prevention, Control And Management Of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism And Disasters) Bill, 2017 and a Prospective Bill of 2022 as discussed in news articles, is straightforwardly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. It contravenes several International Treaties and Conventions including the Nuremberg Treaty of 1947 which was enacted to ensure that no country would repeat such inhuman medical atrocities on fellow human beings”, the 12-page letter reads. “Strangely, t

Protesters demand release of Teesta Setalvad, Sreekumar, seek review of SC order

By Our Representative  Protests broke out across India on June 27 following Teesta Setalvad’s arrest demanding her immediate release. Sabrang India , a site run by Setalvad, claimed she was “arrested on trumped-up charges after the Supreme Court dismissed the petition moved by Zakia Jafri demanding an investigation into the larger conspiracy behind the 2002 Gujarat violence.” The protesters also demanded release of former DGP Gujarat police RB Sreekumar, also arrested simultaneously. The protests were preceded by over 2,200 people from across the globe signing a statement demanding their immediate release. Leading signatories such as People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) general secretary V Suresh, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) convenor Medha Patkar, former Naval chief Admiral Ramdas. “The state has used the observations made in the judgment to falsely and vindictively prosecute those who had struggled for justice even in the face of state callousness and complicit

Electoral bonds scheme 'compromises' voluntary nature PM relief fund donations

By Rosamma Thomas*  The Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is meant to collect voluntary donations from the general public, either individuals or organizations, to enable assistance to people in times of natural disaster, or for expensive medical treatment. That fundamental voluntary character of the fund, however, has changed in recent years.  The gazette notification of January 2018 announcing the Electoral Bond scheme states, in Clause 12 (2): “The amount of bonds not encashed within the validity period of fifteen days shall be deposited by the authorized bank to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The Union government has, thus, through notification, directed funds to be deposited into what was meant to be purely voluntary. Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been campaigning for transparency in government functioning, holds that once a gazette notification has been issued directing that funds be deposited into the PMNRF, the character of the whole fund has changed,

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

'Highly abnormal': AltNews journo's arrest suggests 'deterioration in media freedom'

By Bharat Dogra*  Leading media organizations have come out in strong support of recently arrested journalist Mohammed Zubair. These organizations include, among others, the Editors Guild of India, the Press Club of India, the Delhi Union of Journalists and DIGIPUB, a platform for several important digital media organizations. All these organizations have condemned the recent arrest of the noted journalist and demanded his immediate release. While leading human rights organizations and political parties have also made somewhat similar statements, the strong support of media organizations is particularly important as the effort of the authorities has been to try to present the arrested journalist as someone who has been indulging in irresponsible journalism.  In such a situation the support of those media organizations who are familiar with his work and who are most capable of judging the quality of his work is very important. In this context it is important that some media organization

Majoritarian silence helping Hindutva forces 'handover' national resources to corporates

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The majority of Indian citizens are witnessing the persecution and everyday violence against their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities. The growing assaults on reason, science, secularism, Indian democracy and constitution are going to be landmarks in Indian history of diminishing democracy and citizenship rights. It is clear that Hindutva ideology is directly promoting sectarian politics of hate which is dangerous for the unity and integrity of India, peace and prosperity of Indians. The majoritarian silence helps in empowering Hindutva and their electoral dividends. From witnessing the persecution in the sidelines to the active participation and cheering loud or silence accelerates violence against our neighbours and our fellow citizens. How and why do majority of Indians stay silent and contribute to the persecution of their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities? The question baffles me as an Indian because I have gr

Electricity Bill: Centre's reform measures contain 'carrot and stick package' for states

Counterview Desk  The Peoples’ Commission on Public Sector and Public Services (PCPSPS), claiming to be a network of eminent academics, jurists, erstwhile administrators, trade unionists and social activists, seeking consultations with stakeholders with those who are against the government’s decision to monetise, disinvest and privatise public assets/enterprises, has said that the proposed Electricity (Amendment) Bill-2022 will have far-reaching impacts on the finances of states. Insisting that the proposed Bill would lead to “assault on India’s federal structure”, in a statement, it says, it would weaken the finances of states’ power distribution companies, have adverse impact on utility employees, cripple the states' finances, impose a heavy cost burden on the smaller subsidized consumers (especially farmers), and benefit only corporate business houses. “States cannot afford to ignore the far-reaching implications of the Bill on their economy, finances, agricultural and industria

Cops 'refuse to register' complaint after BSF shot landless worker off Bangla border

By Our Representative  Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convener, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), referring to the incident of “firing and execution” of a poor Muslim youth, has alleged that the 26 year old was was shot at “without giving any warning” one and half kilometers inside the Indian territory from Bangladesh border by an on- duty Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. Stating that the person, Ruhul Mondal, belonged to an Other Backward Class (OBC), and hailed from Ramnarayan Para village under Sagarpara police station in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Roy in his representation said, the BSF person who shot at him is “attached with Singpara Border Outpost, 141 Battalion”, underlining, the BSF has now floated “self defense theory” to cover up its operation. According to the BSF officials, the incident took place in the jute fields in